Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
It's all there...
https://www.qcmfunds.com/the-dark-side-of-darktrace/
Luke Bidco will regret it's takeover of Darktrace in the same way that HP regretted it's takeover of Autonomy. Mark my words.
I wish I could share this optimism. However, as per an earlier post of mine here I am worried that Ocado could face a liquidity crisis in the next two years if it continues to fail to make a net profit. This is very important to remember.
The company burns through a lot of cash and even though it has over £800m of cash on its balance sheet (as of 3rd Dec 2023), it will likely experience liquidity problems by the end of 2025 if it fails to generate a positive net profit by that time.
The company also has £1,459.5m of borrowings as of 3rd Dec 2023 with the majority of these in the form of convertible bonds with maturity dates from 2025-27.
I fear that at some point in the not too distant future, the company will either have to increase it's borrowings on unfavourable terms or raise more money via a placing at potentially a lower share price than the current one, which could be pretty dilutive.
I am also unhappy by the grotesquely excessive amount of money Tim Steiner has been paid over the years. This is absolutely insulting for a company that has still failed to make a positive net profit. I am not against big pay packages. Tim Cook at Apple gets paid a lot but he is worth it since Apple is quite simply a cash machine generating beast of a company. Ocado isn't.
If it wasn't for these risks then I would agree that the current share price is a bargain.
I wish I could share this optimism. However, as per an earlier post of mine here I am worried that Ocado could face a liquidity crisis in the next two years if it continues to fail to make a net profit. This is very important to remember.
The company burns through a lot of cash and even though it has over £800m of cash on its balance sheet (as of 3rd Dec 2023), it will likely experience liquidity problems by the end of 2025 if it fails to generate a positive net profit by that time.
The company also has £1,459.5m of borrowings as of 3rd Dec 2023 with the majority of these in the form of convertible bonds with maturity dates from 2025-27.
I fear that at some point in the not too distant future, the company will either have to increase it's borrowings on unfavourable terms or raise more money via a placing at potentially a lower share price than the current one, which could be pretty dilutive.
I am also unhappy by the grotesquely excessive amount of money Tim Steiner has been paid over the years. This is absolutely insulting for a company that has still failed to make a positive net profit. I am not against big pay packages. Tim Cook at Apple gets paid a lot but he is worth it since Apple is quite simply a cash machine generating beast of a company. Ocado isn't.
If it wasn't for these risks then I would agree that the current share price is a bargain.
Thank you Valueplay for sharing this.
This is of course not the first time that Tim Steiner has been obscenely over remunerated.
A few years ago he was paid £59m despite Ocado making a record loss...
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ocado-chief-tim-steiner-paid-59m-despite-record-loss-8206r03cx
Why Ocado shareholders on this board are not more outraged about this I find rather puzzling. Instead they decide to vent their anger towards those 'pesky shorters'.
Even if Ocado were to go bust, Tim Steiner would still walk away a very wealthy man.
Why should it be made illegal to short shares?
I would argue that it is far riskier to go short than it is to go long. It's not easy and for the very brave. If it were easy everyone would be doing it.
Some short sellers are real mavericks like Jim Chanos (go check him out). He's a black belt at spotting companies that are not only incredibly overvalued, but also at detecting companies early with serious issues long before everyone else (including the financial authorities) have cottoned on.
*CORRECTION: "from a cash position of £1,328m as of 27th November 2022"
I am going over again the company’s annual report for the 53 weeks ending on 3rd December 2023.
At that date, Ocado’s cash position was £884.8m.
That may sound like a lot, but consider that during that 53 week period the company went through £443.2m of it’s cash (from a cash position of £1,328bn as of 27th November 2022).
That is some serious cash burn. If the company continues to burn through cash at this rate then with the current amount of cash remaining it has only two more years remaining before it faces liquidity issues.
The problem with Ocado is that it is still failing to make a net profit.
I am aware that total revenue was £2,825m as of 3rd Dec 2023 (and up over 10% from 27th Nov 2022), but what does this mean when operating costs dwarfed total revenue at £3,337.7m.
When will this company finally make a positive net profit?
Because, if it fails to make a net profit in the coming years it will simply have to keep eating into its finite cash pile.
It is a shame that the company didn’t have an equity raising when the price was in the £8 - £10 range last year. In fact I remember a poster suggesting a placing of around 100m additional shares in that price range and getting shot down in flames. The company could have raised an additional £800m - £1bn in cash.
The company already has £1,459.5m of borrowings as of 3rd Dec 2023 and I’d rather the company doesn’t increase it’s borrowings. Much of these borrowings are in the form of convertible bonds with maturity dates from 2025-27; not that far off.
"Superdry confirms that it is in discussions with Hilco over an increase to its lending facilities by approximately £10 million to provide the Company with necessary additional liquidity headroom to help facilitate the implementation of its ongoing turnaround plan and cost reduction programme, along with an additional £10 million to assist with seasonal working capital peaks to the extent required, and an extension to the maturity date of its facilities with Hilco by six months to 7 February 2025. There is no certainty that such changes will be agreed."
I have said many times in previous posts here how uncomfortable I feel about Superdry turning to Hilco Capital for additional liquidity. This has always been a major red flag for me since Hilco is a vulture firm - just look at their history. Now that the company are discussions with Hilco again to increase its lending facility is a really bad sign and just simply reinforces how deeply in trouble SDRY is.
On the surface, the latest results for NVDA are impressive - revenue for the year ending on January 28th 2024 was $60.922bn - more than double the revenue figure of $26.974bn for the previous year ending on January 29th 2023. Much of this revenue growth was fuelled by a massive jump in revenues from it's Data Centre business, which increased from $15.005bn (for the year ending on Jan 29th 23) to $47.525bn (for the year ending on Jan 28th 24) - a whopping 200%+ increase in just one year.
But lets not get too carried away here. With a current market cap of $1.94tn against $60.992bn of revenue, NVDA now trades on a valuation of over 32 times revenues! And this is no small cap AIM growth stock here. This is a company with a near $2tn market cap!
I hope that the managers here will take some profit on their holding, because if they don't they will only have themselves to blame once this obscene bubble bursts - which it will. I have seen this all before I am afraid.
My own calculations put the current NAV figure (as of 2nd Dec 23) at 62p. And that's taking into account the latest cash position of £128.1m, which was a lot higher before the Nigerian Naira devalutation.
I don't think PZC should completely exit from Nigeria. Even though there is a lot of corruption in this country, it also has a lot of future growth potential and it would be a pity if PZC missed out on that. The Nigerian Niara is however a very unstable currency and the company should not have so much of this currency in cash. Most of the cash generated from its Nigeria operations should be converted into US dollars and that way the company's overall cash position is protected from further devaluations in the Niara.
"Could be a Private Equity target"
I hope not and as a shareholder I would vote against any takeover advances. Despite current headwinds, I think PZC has a lot of growth potential - much more than a bigger company such as Unilever.
"It's far from Bankruptcy though."
I am not so sure about that. First Seagull are taking a very big risk and there is absolutely no guarentee that it will pay off. I imagine they don't have all their eggs in one basket.
I have noticed the wild swings in the share price over the last two trading days. This is still a very high risk investment.
I urge all new investors that do decide to invest here to please look at the company's latest financials and don't be swayed by the ocean of comments here.
My issue with this company is very simple: operating costs continue to be higher than gross profit. This is not sustainable and has already had a big impact on a company's liquidity. And it is because of this that Superdry have had to engage in some pretty onerous loan agreements like the one with Hilco Capital.
I will only consider this company investable again once operating costs are substantially reduced and it is making good net profits again. And once it has found a way to extricate itself out of the Hilco loan agreement. I do not like Hilco. I have said this already many times, but they a vulture organisation.
I fear that you may well be right 404x. Hilco are vultures, a dreadful company, and this is exactly the situation they want. They are betting on Superdry going into administration.
Group revenue down 23.5% from last year. However, this is not the biggest issue for me. For me, it's the inability of this company to keep it's operating costs down. Again, SGA expenses (£145.3m) exceed gross profit (£118.7m).
This is an excellent ETF to have exposure to the FTSE 250. Only my opinion, but I think the FTSE 250 will outperform the S&P 500 over the next 10 years. The S&P 500 is dangerously hot right now with a large chunk of its market cap concentrated in just 6-7 stocks. Even though the S&P 500 has a much bigger aggregate market cap than the FTSE 250, I would actually argue that it is currently more high risk.
Investors talk about how disappinting the performance of the FTSE has been over the last 20-25 years. Firstly, they are refering to the FTSE 100 index. It is true this index hasn't been punching above it's weight during this time period. However, its a different story for the FTSE250. Over the last 25 years the index has more than tripled in value.
I also think from a sentiment point of view the UK has almost hit rock bottom and there is every chance that this could all change at some point in the coming years.
This Vanguard 250 ETF has low fees (0.10% charge) and pays a 3.42% dividend paid quarterly.
"Last year Tesla went down to around 100, then went up to 300, it's down to around 200 now, these kind of price swings are normal for the high growth companies that SMT invest in. NVDA and ASML are flying high at the moment, but they too have similar price swings."
Such volatility is normal for growth companies with much more modest market caps. However, here we are talking about companies with market caps in the hundreds of billions of dollars. NVDA currently has a market cap of almost 1.5 trillion dollars! That's almost half of the UK's GDP!
"Superdry might not be "cool" anymore but it is still producing a lot of revenue every year. If they snip a few expenses then they can return to profitability."
You are correct that SDRY revenue levels are high, but as I already mentioned in a previous post, these high revenues don't matter when operating costs are higher than gross profit. And the problem is that it is not so easy for SDRY to substantially reduce those costs. It owns far too many stores and sadly I don't think SDRY is in a position where it can simply get rid of many of these stores. As Jimini pointed out, many of those stores have leases that SDRY cannot walk away from. And I am also guessing that some of these leases are very long. It's a tricky situation.