Member Info for Aputure

Deeside - On my count, 12 approved, 3 abstained and 1 was against (the person representing the chap who thinks Eqtec's plant is an incinerator; so discounting that ignorant person, there would've been no-one against it. Very good explanation by Gary, the member of the council who was in charge of this application as he highlighted the fact that 4000 fewer trucks would be on the roads as a result of this scheme and that this was an advanced, cleaner energy from waste technology, distinct from incineration that would produce negligible emissions. It was interesting listening to it as many of the councillors tried to sow a seed of doubt about emissions and transport but all the concerns were dealt with by Gary.

I will be listening in on the Deeside decision; the only complaint is by one person who erroneously conflates incineration with gasification...given that all the information was provided to the councillors in advance, it is most likely a deliberate act; I can't see it having any bearing on proceedings. Their gasification plant will be sited in an industrial area located adjacent to an incineration plant that is larger than the one Eqtec are proposing.

That would mean a leak of information; more likely is a seller pushed the price down and once they finished buyers came in and pushed it back off the low. We’ll see if there is a further bounce tomorrow.

Aandi - Perhaps the additional issuance of shares over the past 6 months has altered their percentage?

As we have come to expect from DP, a very thorough, cogent response. This minor roadblock should soon be resolved.

Antelope - how did you calculate 250mcap? Just with the financial completion of the existing contracts I envisage 300mcap would be fair value; if we take two projects off the 13 touted as extremely likely then we should expect news of 11 more projects this year; I would forecast a conservative increase to at least 600mcap a year from now dependant on projects agreed but assuming a small percentage of them financially closed. The size, timing, planning and financial agreement of these projects will impact these figures of course.

That’s from Friday.

It was also ‘liked’ by DP...

Looks like a tree shake to me too, making the most of the negative sentiment.

Garry, no, as Janus Henderson was 4.7% a few days ago.

Re. Kev.

And on that note, you’ve made it to my filtered list.

JR - They crossed the threshold on the 5th so no bearing on yesterday.

And ITM will climb a lot more, the rate of which is the question. The market for electrolysers is in its infancy as is the market for waste to energy in the form of gasification. The percentage rise will be much greater for Eqtec this year unless there are significant delays.

Jai - ITM went up 3250% in 2 years as it was 20p in March 2019. Quite a performance but playing catch up after being undervalued for over a decade.

Yes it’s blatantly obvious to people with market experience but some people are ignorant of the games. Looks like it would’ve been difficult to buy any anyway at those levels.

If you take a parallel to ITM, around 15 months ago; several board members sold a significant amount of shares between 60 and 68p. Let that sink in. SP doubled 3 months later. They then sold again last year at 280p; it has more than doubled since then. And they hadn’t salary sacrificed. They do however hold many options like Gerry.

By approx 77M shares which would partly explain the sells and lack of upward movement in the SP.

Judge yet to release the decision

Slippytoad; not even; we’re half the market cap so more like 4.25.