Member Info for Aputure

Rinkidink- Fully funded was including access to finance; out of their control with regards to Taurus who have clearly demanded this. I’m down on my investment here but I see this increasing substantially over the next 2 months as it looks like they will be ahead of schedule and delivery of potash will be earlier than originally anticipated.

Newboy - extension is till the 11th, so we’ll see tomorrow night how the market reacts.

It’s what I’ve seen with multiple companies pre and post COVID; dilution is common, indeed that’s what AIM seems to be for; companies list to attract funding to research and develop; as I said if this means we get to market sooner then it’s the right decision. I see multiples of the current SP if they deliver the revenues and profits they have forecast. I’ve followed FMG since 2004 and I’m certain this CEO will deliver on this and future projects; bear in mind this is the first project; I would have less sympathy for financial/funding errors on subsequent projects/lakes.

We’ll soon have more clarity on the deal when the ASX opens in a few hours time. Whilst some may complain that they already said they had sufficient funds, it seems to me that they are progressing faster than they originally envisaged; if this gets them over the line faster, so an early February completion rather than late Feb, early March then revenues will arrive sooner too. Additionally there may be cost overruns or issues caused by COVID. If they’ve already secured the finance that is a good sign and new investors will see this as a good entry point given how close they are to production.

Yes, that was posted a few months ago; could’ve been on ADVFN though, can’t remember now.

Aandi - If you can I would focus on working for/with green clean tech companies. That said, O&Gs are expanding their clean fuel divisions. Are you noticing a focus on hydrogen at all in the O&G industry? That’s what I’m seeing. I’m based in the South East of England.

Aandi- Glad to see you leaving the dark side ;) I like the path you are on. I’ve been interested in the environment for over 11 years since I did an MSc in Environmental Management but sadly unable to get work in that field. I’m also a vegan, mostly local/seasonal wfpb initially to reduce my environmental impact (I already just cycled to get to places) but couldn’t go back now for ethical reasons. I will soon have financial independence which will allow me to focus on work that I really want to do. I’ve continued to learn more online; renewables, energy storage, built environment/passivhaus and general skills (bookkeeping, project management etc). We are so lucky to have access to online repositories and the ability to easily communicate and learn or impart information to others across the globe. Good luck with your approach to Wood Group and any future opportunities.

There was 250k 0.99 at 16.35 then a late trade also at 0.99 at 3.5M+ as worzel said above.

No it was just 250000 UT at 0.99p

EQT is still significantly undervalued and there will be an outcome very shortly one way or the other.

See earlier thread.

No, this happens on most of the companies I follow; I am not the market maker so there is nothing for me to accept or not accept.

It wasn’t an incorrect close, it’s just how they define the close. Yes, it’s what they often do (mark down to bid/offer at 16:29:59) but it wasn’t incorrect.

It can also be one large trade being put through over the course of the day though in small amounts.

Yes, as mentioned before, trading 212 or similar mediums, you will see small trades, often higher bids and lower asks to compensate for the cost of the trading itself ('free' trading...)

The first trade after 16:35 marks the UT; any subsequent trades do not affect the close price. It always happens with the companies I follow. And as V111 says its immaterial, it is what it is, and the trend is upwards with imminent news.

The close on LSE wasn't incorrect; the UT was 0.98 and that's what they base the close price on. On the ADVFN app on my phone, the time the price was listed was 9:51:33, at a price of 0.9507.

No, the trade is more likely to be a buy given the timing; it was 94-95 and over the next few minutes the price shot up to over 1p.

Aandi- didn’t you say you placed a £70k order? Yes I saw that one at that time.

Maybe they missed the decimal point ;-)