Member Info for Aputure

I’m busy but at £499 I wouldn’t be attending anyway.

Both. Large payment upfront as it’s a large plant and recurring revenues and a signal of confidence for future contracts.

bodes well for tomorrow; was a new level created today or will there be a retrace? We’ll find out this week. If there is a firm contract with Billingham then of course EQT will no longer be a sub penny stock; we may even surpass it prior to the conclusion of the deal.

Ducks in a row...

My suggestion would be for you to look at what you are interested in and/or where you see the market heading in the future; find out what companies operate in that sector or sectors and read up on their product or service; look for any potential competitors; read up on their management team, present and historical; look at the size of the market they are in and what affect a disruptive company may have on that market; read all the companies RNSs and look for analyst reports; that should do for starters ??

You seem to have fortuitously invested in this share; as others have said and I just intimated you are lucky; myself and many others have done extensive research; nothing is guaranteed but if EQT secures a small percentage of its pipeline it will be significantly undervalued if it remains at this level. By the way, the market cap is a far better signifier of value or perceived value not the price itself; it could be 82p with 100 times fewer shares in circulation. The market cap would remain the same.

Also just noticed a 7.5M after hours.

Another possible II building a stake.

Badshah - wrong company; that’s PHE not Eqtec.

Crown use Lead Acid, so not surprising the drop in performance. I wonder what the difference is between LA and Li-Ion. Li-ion loses significantly less capacity than LA in cold temperature environments. Still, the charging (downtime) issues in a fork lift scenario still remain at the moment and fuel cells fare better in the cold than Li-Ion.

What are you studying?

Aandi - An incinerator...

Stokey - the bankruptcy information re patents is public knowledge; I can’t remember if I posted the link on that before.

Southerhay - Yes that has been my thinking ever since I came across ITM 12 years ago...cost was the main reason it didn't happen, along with very little regulatory support as government has been continuously lobbied by fossil and grid suppliers that centralised power is necessary. Yes, it is still necessary of course, but for me distributed generation and storage is the way forward and especially community based generation, distribution and storage in addition to local, in situ, generation and storage. That is more efficient and resilient too in terms of energy security; it should ultimately cost less as well after the initial investment. However investing money into our old housing stock ensuring it reduces the demand in the first place and overhauling the new build regulations makes the most sense, economically and operationally. Unfortunately there has historically been very little support for passive or retrofit passive homes and the building sector has not been regulated in a way that encourages those homes.

Indeed Rouley, that appears to be the case; I just had a cursory look for images of fluidised gasification units, and coincidentally enough, many of them show a generic diagram with a cylinder, an inverted cone and various fuel and air inlets in the same layout as described in the infringement claim...if this is the best Aries can come up with after 6 months of pestering Eqtec and it's partners, then I am more confident than I was before in this claim failing to prove any merit; we'll find out soon enough; it does smack of desperation on the side of Aries, with regards to a potential competitor on their own soil.

I am no expert on patents or indeed gasification, however from reading the infringement claim, Aries are claiming that they have a patent on, as gpanner alluded to, the shape and location of the different elements of the gasification unit. It would be useful if someone on here was familiar with gasification units. There are certain parts to the gasification unit that are needed for it to work; the claim doesn't seem to specify a unique proprietary process.

MMGames - ITM rose from 20p in April last year to 360 in June this year. At 20p, ITM was valued at £65M. AFC is currently valued at £150M. ITM raised 58.8M and secured a JV with Linde which was the trigger to it's current value including the confirmation of their 1GW factory. The understanding around needing to generate H2 and the subsequent policy shift was also instrumental. Unless AFC has substantial news and contracts as well as synergistic partnerships in the next few months then no, £2.60 is not going to happen in your time frame. It does looks as if AFC is finally on the right path and I look forward to the contracts pertaining to construction sites and genset replacements; that is the news I am looking forward to in the near term. The micro electrolyser is also intriguing but we will find out soon enough if that is a 3rd party unit (most likely at this point) or a one off AFC made unit.

Which day, I can't find the date?

Pure also make CE certifies alkaline electrolysers and they’re a smaller U.K. company so might be more amenable to making a custom made system.

I’ve followed McPhy for many years but hadn’t looked into the stock listing; that’s gutting as I’d’ve definitely invested as the mcap would’ve been around £75M back in May...