RE: TEN BAGGER🥳5 Sep 2025 09:36
Wildswimmer
Fair points again 👍 — revenue now would definitely be welcome. But for a junior explorer, the reality is that strategic stakes in near-term development projects can be a smart way to get exposure to cashflow without burning capex.
The Colorado uranium waste dumps with DISA is one such potential near-term revenue stream (zero capex/opex from MET1, just a % of gross product sales). The Evolution stake adds a second string to the bow in graphite — development-ready, with offtakes already in place. It’s not scatter-gun, it’s about building a balanced portfolio of critical minerals aligned to government-backed sectors (uranium, graphite, nickel, copper, PGEs).
As for the related party sign-off 😅 — at least it’s out in the open, reviewed independently, and cleared under AIM rules. Plenty of outfits don’t even bother with that level of transparency!!!
So yes, we’re still pre-revenue, but the building blocks for multiple revenue pathways are finally being laid. The trick is timing — and with US/EU demand for critical minerals soaring, I’d rather MET1 is positioning early than missing the wave.
GLA DYOR (Be Nice to Each Other!! Honestly, lets reset and try again!!!)