Member Info for andrbea

Https://www.tradingview.com/news/tradingview:e60c1625aabac:0-pelican-acquisition-outlines-greenland-drilling-plan-trust-cash-and-valuation-ahead-of-vote/

Red to blue.

Strong close (14%)

Noticed this (sector interest):

DonaldJTrumpJr speaking today at the U.S. Capital Access Forum in #Singapore 👀🤫🇺🇸

DYOR ⏩ on #80M @GL_Energy_Co $GLND

-Event: Hall Chadwick U.S. Capital Access Forum

-Dates: 10–11 March 2026

-Location: Capella Hotel, Singapore

-Host: Hall Chadwick (Australian global accounting and advisory firm)

This is a high-level investment and capital markets conference bringing together:

•U.S. capital market executives

•Global exchanges and investment banks

•Private equity and institutional investors

•Mining, technology and energy companies

•Companies looking to raise capital or list in the U.S.

The forum focuses on how international companies can access U.S. capital markets and how geopolitics, supply chains, and strategic resources affect global investment flows.

CASCAIS, Portugal, March 04, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pulsar Helium Inc. (AIM: PLSR, TSXV: PLSR, OTCQB: PSRHF) ("Pulsar” or the "Company”), a primary helium company, is pleased to announce that the Jetstream #7 appraisal well at the Company’s flagship Topaz Project in Minnesota, USA has intersected a pressurized gas zone. The gas zone was encountered at a depth of approximately 2,107 feet (642 meters) with a preliminary bottom-hole pressure of approximately 953 pounds per square inch (psi). Visible gas influx was observed during drilling operations, confirming a strongly pressurized system. The Jetstream wells continue to maintain a 100% success rate of intersecting pressurized gas.

Https://www.manilatimes.net/2026/03/04/tmt-newswire/globenewswire/pulsar-helium-reports-pressurized-gas-encounter-at-jetstream-7-at-the-topaz-helium-project-usa/2292836

Https://www.gasworld.com/story/attacks-on-iran-threaten-helium-supply/2173766.article/

If you draw an upward line thru' the low points of June 2025 and Nov 2025, then we're definitely in oversold territory. the bounce up is overdue.

The more liquidity they can achieve on the OTC stock will help exposure to US investors. and get us on the radar in America. Let's be honest, it's where the cash is for advancing projects in the critical minerals space.

As EEE has very high purity I (if I were CEO....) would be phoning the US critical minerals initiative. Look, for example, at how they poured money into this Canadian company (Nov. 2025) in a pre-construction phase (so not unlike EEE).

"The Company developed a detailed work program and is currently progressing with studies to advance the project through the pre-construction phase"

Https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/northcliff-announces-grant-extension-construction-124500141.html

That is the big point nowadays IMO. Projects that haven't entered production yet (so a long way from the finish line), .... but which the US initiative is willing to fund.

He said in the analysis of last Autumn, Cosgrove only amounted to 400m tonnes of the total 2.2bn of recource.

But in the original exploration target (mid-2024), Cosgrove formed the major part of the then 30 billion tonne target.

see video at 2m17s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsQ0lX7rZm8

Cosgrove has better near-surface grades than Thomas.

Thomas and Cosgrove are 20km apart. So with Thomas & Cosgrove they would have 2 options. The map of the 2026 drilling shows a new focus on Cosgrove.

Sounds good to me.....

I can remember this at the dizzy heights of 170p....

Https://www.jpost.com/business-and-innovation/precious-metals/article-884340

Aangel brokers note (80m mentioned)

*************

Europe’s political leaders are scrambling to show their indignation and soft opposition to Trump’s plan to acquire Greenland.

We believe unreported discussions between the US and native Greenlanders indicate a preference to align with the US while sidelining Denmark.

NATO needs the US and NATO needs US to defend Greenland.

Trump may have backed off demands to ‘own’ Greenland but if a new deal is struck we suspect the US will be in charge and will consider Greenland to be US territory.

We suspect this is important for Greenland’s defence as an uninvited landing by Russian or Chinese services needs to have the potential to be seen as a breach of a US or NATO border.

In reality, any force landing on Greenland is going to struggle to maintain its presence, though the emplacement of missiles and air defences could impede flight paths over the region.

Minerals:

Exploration in Greenland is expensive, there is a short exploration season and exploration is limited to rock exposed by the receding ice sheet.

While it is easy to fly along the coast, much of it is a bit far for helicopter surveys.

Travel by boat is limited by safe landing spots and the terrain is often difficult thereafter.

Good planning, logistics and understanding of how to exist in Greenland is essential for anyone working out there.

Mineral deposits:.

Rare Earths: Kvanefjeld and Tanbreez

Graphite: GreenRock Mining has the old Amitsoq graphite mine

Gold: Amaroq Minerals is looking to develop the Nalunaq Gold mine

Zinc, lead, and silver: The Black Angel Mine was closed after a fuel delivery failed to arrive in time to keep the plant running.

Ilmenite: 80 Mile plc has the Dundas ilmenite project in Pituffik. The project is 20 mins from Qaanaaq in the Arctic Circle by helicopter or 8 hours around the coast by boat.

The strategic US air base at Thule is visible from the abandoned settlement at Pituffik

Oil and Industrial gases: 80 Mile plc is exploring for industrial gasses on the East coast of Greenland in the Jameson Land basin.

A third-party resource evaluation report estimates 2U prospective oil resources at 4.2bnb (Pmean). Significant potential for Oil & Gas is seen across the continental shelf.

Zinc: Ironbark Zinc is looking to develop the he Citronen lead-zinc project in the Citronen Fjord. Citronen is one of the world's largest undeveloped zinc resources

Zinc and Feldspar: 80 Mile plc* hold licenses at: Kangerlussuaq.

Uranium: Greenlanders are vehemently opposed to the mining of uranium or any other radionucleides in Greenland due to the potential for poisoning long term fish and mammal stocks.

Nickel and PGMs: Disco project. 80 Mile plc* recently regained full ownership of the Disco project following expenditure of ~$12m of exploration by Kobold Metals.

Sector background:

Https://www.allens.com.au/insights-news/insights/2026/01/critical-minerals-in-2026-the-rise-of-rare-earths-and-lessons-from-the-lithium-boom/

A story about silver, but of interest to any critical mineral:

Seems the Chinese are taking controlling interests in mining companies operating in South America, who the U.S. rely on for 60% of their supply of critical minerals, eg gold, silver, copper etc. And that the US authorities have been unaware of this.

Which kinda makes the supply route from Australia even more urgent, as China could (on a whim) ship the ore from those mines straight to Shanghai. And leave the US with a problem.

For the full story on China's tactics:

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zo2bOH1_Gvk

I agree with the poster on advfn (eee). He wrote:

the Canaccord note:

What stood out to me most was the emphasis on the current resource alone supporting an initial 30yr mine life. That's a big statement at this stage and definitely reduces the usual resource risk that can plague early projects like ours.Like I said recently, that single point moves the conversation from "is it big enough?" to "how does it get built".We're also now getting info on valuation, CG have used the "Net Asset Value" approach, which is also telling IMO. They are valuing Pitfield as a future operating mine, not as blue-sky pipe dream.On their assumptions, the unrisked NAV comes out at around £1.24 per share based on the current share count. They have then applied a conservative 0.5x NAV multiple, which brings them back to the 62p target price.

If we're going to mirror the Nasdaq valuation, surely they have to suspend WCAP and then restore the listing at the correct valuation (to reflect wcap to wshp)?

Finished up 51% on the Nasdaq (wshp)

We’re pleased to announce that Sulnox has signed a global long-term distribution agreement with Drew Marine, a major supplier of performance chemicals and fuel management services to the maritime industry.

Drew Marine operates in 1,200+ ports and supports commercial, cruise, government and military fleets worldwide. Under the agreement, Sulnox Eco™ will be added to their existing portfolio and supported by their global sales, service and technical teams - providing access to a highly complementary customer base of over 1,000, around 75% of which is new to Sulnox.

This marks a significant step forward in expanding Sulnox’s global footprint and strengthening the commercial scale of our technology.

Seeking Alpha had a negative article about wshp, but the lead comment (see under comments) to that was bullish;

here's the bullish standpoint:

Https://seekingalpha.com/article/4846056-weshop-avoid-this-meme-stock#scroll_comments