Member Info for AlfaMale

Gotta give a LOL to this...if only for the tenacity.

TR61,

Thanks. I respect your opinions too, and am happy to agree to disagree, but I don't think we are disagreeing on much, and am not taking anything personally. No need to write a book about it though! :)

I just think it is sensible for a company to play the cards close to their chest and not overly divulge details, despite what gets put into the press. I understand that shareholders need information to make informed decisions, but I also accept that as a shareholder, I will not be privy to every detail until deals get done etc. Commercial confidentiality plays a big part here too, and overrides shareholder desires.

Just quickly on your point #3 - you can't take as gospel what they say, because often they won't know all the facts on how things are going to turn out. So they can tell you one thing on the phone, but the end reality is different. This is also why I don't think they put out too many RNS' about 'deals' until they have more certainty on where things are going. The press articles give you a hint, but perhaps nothing firm, hence no comments from PMO. Imagine the uproar if they RNS that they are doing 'A and B' and shareholders act accordingly, but then in a few weeks time, it turns out to be 'X and Y'... You know the mayhem that would ensue!!

TR61,

You were stating that TD was 'wishy woshy' with the details in the RNS, so presumably you were expecting a full breakdown of what was happening after the press gave us the nod that something might be going on.

No CEO is going to divulge such details, especially at such an early stage, when there could be many options on the table - hence my naive comment. TD gave you the minimum of confirmation in the RNS.

And you would trust the papers more than TD - i.e. trusting those that dropped that story into the press, specifically intended to suppress the share price. Well that really does say it all. LOL

PMO didn't pretend anything was secret - they have publicly stated that they will look at any synergistic deals that are appropriate for the company. It's what one would expect from such an organisation.

Dodger - look at a 5 year chat with Brent overlaid on top of PMO.

TR61,

Honestly - are you so naive that you don't know that when you're toying with $100m+ deals, you don't show your hand and blab out all your plans to all and sundry, especially when there is competition for assets, just to keep a few whining shareholders happy.

You're starting to sound like the CashFerret blaming TD for everything.

You will know what the deal is if/when it happens, and not before.

Good on TD for having some business acumen.

The press articles are just speculation, or planted by someone with an inside track that has something to gain by keeping the SP suppressed - probably GS.

Apollo bring the cash, but unlikely they have the operational ability.

A perfect partnership?

Boobalicious - thanks for figures.

That's a huge draw.

And to "do a Members" ... oil is flying, and PMO hasn't even moved up by 1p!!!

Yawwwn

Members, me old pedigree - are you gonna say the same thing every day, now that you're holding again?

Members,
I was gonna reply to your earlier post, but I see it has been removed by the LSE admin.

Members, you loon...

LOL

"you patronising, obnoxious moron"

"I look at daily, weekly and monthly movements"

Indeed - I said look at the 5 year chart of Brent overlaid with PMO.

"That is exactly what I have done, you little childish baby"

Doesn't sound like it, child.

LOL

"Don't you ever try again to patronise me, you cretin"

LOL

"POMO and Brent directly and very closely correlated... I think whoever thinks that is living on another planet"

Member(s),

FGS - You just don't listen do you?

Nobody has said that PMO follows Brent on a DAILY basis! It's only you that has been obsessed with the minute by minute movements of each looking for correlation.

You were told to look at the bigger picture - i.e. a 5 year chart to see the general long term correlation between the two.

Now, that's the last time I'm explaining it to you!

Hmmm...

LOL

Members is spamming the board with his deramping now that he has sold out.

Outofideas - agree - Oil & FTSE & DOW are all racing ahead (and TLW just to keep Members happy!) whilst PMO is begrudgingly rising by a few pence - nothing significant.

Any pull back in oil or the FTSE will see PMO heavily punished.

Must be the weight of the Goldman Sucks activity and the Chevron "story" holding us down - conveniently for some, of which I am sure.

"Oil breaking Upwards , PMO will be one of the biggest risers as a result"

LOL you obviously don't know PMO!

EMC2 - are you honestly quibbling about 0.05p on the share price??

Agree, it's pathetic that the share price is 1p lower than earlier.

Auson,

Yes, shorttracker only shows holdings over 0.5%.

Members,

Why on earth should it matter if TLW's share price is up by more than PMOs compared to 4 months ago?

Who is to say that PMO, or TLW for that matter, was correctly valued 4 months ago?

Yet you are harping on as if they were, and now that there is a big discrepancy you are going back into your usual panic mode.

Games are clearly afoot with the involvement of Goldman Sucks and the shorts (3.42%) currently in place, so there is no point trying to make sense of it.

PMO are clearly undervalued, so just let it play out ... and relax!