Member Info for AKHM

Apologies I mis understood it. Still doesn’t explain why they can’t do a 2 year extension though to the old agreement though.

Very diplomatic answer by IR. I mean they could have signed a 1-4 year extension and that would still not have triggered the new requirements, so we are still none the wiser.

The 9 month extension essentially takes us to when the board roughly hoped the trial is completed or just before it is completed. If they are not linked in any way I would be surprised. Irrespective of this we still need to get this 4 way agreement nailed down and the trial started asap.

Sorry HF I wasn’t trying to be rude. Just banter. I defo think I must be glass half full and you are glass half empty personality type though. You asked why they have only signed for 9 months. I just threw up a possible reason. Likely to to be totally wrong but no one else has put up any rationale reason for the shorter contract length!

I guess I balance you out then as your negativity continues to amaze me

Maybe if they have a commercial contract by then they will be in a far stronger position to negotiate better prices for the chemicals considering they will need far greater volumes

Techy I think Peter actually said he expects the other shipping company to be sorted in Jan but he won’t release an RNS until the whole trial is water tight and ready to roll. Think he stated Q1 for this piece of news. I may be wrong.

I was just replying to SR to say to do actually expect some news this month. How people want to take that is up to them but it was meant to be directed to SR.

I have simply said that I expect news as this is what Peter inferred at the AGM but if it comes in February then I will also be fine with this

Why is that bs Vince?

To be fair SR I do expect there to be news in January. It won’t bother me if there isn’t but ai won’t underestimate Peter just yet. I won’t moan if it isn’t January though.

HF I rekon if Peter has been a CEO of an established company for 5-10 years prior to this he is probably sitting on a fair whack in the bank anyway. He could probably not work for 5 years and still be as rich in that time living off interest alone. Wouldn’t be hard for him to take a job with some risk.

HF you say if he was world class he wouldn’t be a CEO here. With amount of share options that Peter has now if he turns QED into a marine fuel player and can turn the SP from 2.5/3p into 50p-£1 how much does this potentially earn him? 20-50million quid? I would say that’s more than enough incentive to work with quadrise.

Peter properly tidying up the board. Starting to look like a professional board now rather than some market salesman.

The fake posters stick out like a sore thumb now. It’s hilarious.

He also made a point of under promising and over delivering. Something he said is common sense in business (clearly not what we have done for the past 15 years). That being said I wouldn’t be surprised if he already had the meetings dates lined up at the AGM and he was factoring in some leeway into his aims. Personally I wouldn’t be surprised if we had a sign off sooner than people think. Just my optimistic opinion but I will give PB the benefit of his word until he proves me otherwise.

A 30% decrease in share price will soon be forgiven if we get a 300% rise on an RNS. I’m still fully behind Peter and his plan.

Must be the 80 quids worth of sells that has scuppered us all.

HF if we don’t get the marine agreement signed in Jan then I would think the odds significantly increase that it will be done by end Feb. Who knows mind!

Looking forward to the new year. Just imagine if Peter is able to get this agreement over the line by end of January. Only a few weeks to work his magic but my word it will be interesting to see the market reaction should be be successful. I’m actually hoping he has these meetings scheduled asap and was saying end of January to give him some leeway.