Member Info for AIMtodeath

6million max daily volume in a year and today is alrady 7.9m

Thats different than getting them as 'part' of the fund raising, any company copuld have bought shares. Trisse has already indicated through contacts they really only had 1.5m max and there has been repeative selling of late of them getting out. Just as well you couldn't touch your shares in SAV....... stopped you making a mistake and selling them ;)

Beaufort got no shares in the last year on fund raises. Best they got was an option for 1.5m at 7.92p

AND THERE IT IS...... 10p....just once of course...haha

was flagged a minute ago, sell quote dropped heavily, those string of 100k sells explains it.

Ask at 9.5p will take a few to topple it

Word is getting around, presentations, news, chat. Its being flagged on peoples watch lists etc. PR starting to gather momentum, they need to start delivering RNS' to back the talk up. Finally get Oman over the line and crack open the taps on making Portugal a reality not just some pretty numbers. When SAV starts mentioning names of possible strategic partners or offtake sniffing adds to the value with industry thumbs up. European battery alliance big brother hopefully might be hand on the back too.

Small investors out in force ready to sell at last weeks peak resistance

Proves putting up a fight can get results.

- the dice are loaded heavily to favour the MMs and there is nothing anyone can do about it. You have 3 options. 1. Sell up and don't invest in AIM stock that is not SETS traded. 2. Accept the fact and work around it best you can like everyone else does 3. Or don't accept it but stop drowning the board in your tears about it. One day...... the shares might move to SETS and you can be happy again. However volume is perhaps too low still, with SETS comes shorting too, another issue you that can kill a share value. If your invested for long term value, then weekly/monthly moves are irrelevant as long as long term value is met, but you have to play the long game.

In fact from midday there was 500k sold between 8.27 and 8.311p and with that slightly late 235k, just over 300k buys to offset the rising sell price??

I make the actual sells today of 100k or more of 700k, plus the 3 (50, 32 and 20) earlier in the day making 800k of sells, with little in the way of buys to offset yet the sell price rose to 8.311p IG had for most of the day less than 100k pegged at 9.2 and anything higher plenty of availablity at 8.5p. Just at close I could still sell 230k at 8.311p. Must be good for a 500k buy order to drop later, orrrrrr the MMs are gathering for themselves as they know something is coming and they need stock to sell into a rise??? He says dreaming....

IG still putting off buyers under 100k Buy lurking end of day.....

another big sell, who sells with such tight news coming? These sells are from big holders, traders can't have picked up that many shares on the rise from 5.25p to have that amount to sell.

The first of the London presentations..... PR wise getting that Scoping Study out is paramount. Drill results too. Maybe they are going to drip out RNS' next week in the run up to the presentations with hopefully price rising of the back of it and new faces seeing the wonder of it all...... Scoping study was to be comfortably inside Q2, with May quoted, unless there is a good development requiring reconfigurartion of the plan pushing it to the time limit. Archer needs to hit targets too, can't keep missing them.

IG has now put everything below 50k at 9.2p! Not a good deal! 100k and upwards 8.5p 200k - 8.27p sell 8.5p buy A buyer perhaps if they are keen to take that many at that price despite the selling earlier?

It should be noted that all trade declarations made by the market do not include a buy or sell indicator and therefore we have to derive this information ourselves. The policy we have adopted is based on the mid price of the stock at the time of the declaration. For example, a trade declared at a price that is higher than the mid price at the time of declaration would be put in the buy column, a trade lower than the mid price would be put in the sell column Its the same on all reporting sites the methodology.

50k and 1 shares i.e. 50,001 gets you 8.8p.....nuts up to 35k still at 8.4p, then jumps to 9.2 to 50k, then drops off after that

50k shares getting rough treatment again 10k shares - 8.4p 50k shares - 9.2p (I kid you not!) 100k shares - 8.5p I would think the major stumbling block with sets is still liquidity, despite value. With sets do you have to offer shares for shorting, because this could do without that nugget for the foreeseeable future!

There has been several articles about this, its 'criminal' in every sense of the word. F'ed over by Beaufort then when your down f'ed over by PWC, not sure whom is the bigger criminal, Beaufort or PWC. �900/hr fees etc. Try looking up the RT Align Research article about it, last day or so. So from what I understand is if Beaufort had stock of a share its probably been sold or being sold. Then the client accounts will be sold down to liquidate stock for cash....to ummm pay PWC. People holding �150k+ taking possibily 40% cuts! But perhaps many of these affected shares, many would not have been able to accumulate more shares at depressed prices.....silver lining, just not for Beaufort clients....