Member Info for AimMaster2018

Based on below, they went from 5% plus holding to below to 0.77% hence sell.

If they went from 0 to 0.77, u wouldn't have to rns as its below 5% as no threshold woudav been crossed.

But am sorry, its a sell. Which is why when rns was released the share dropped around the same time as market marker dropped the price but the confusion got PI to be swallowed in. Obviously this is help reduced my losses but concern is the bigger picture of what's in store for the sp when results out and also will it result in same reaction to serco result and be stuck at a loss for longer imho

Heres some help:

Which circumstances require a notification? A notification is made whenever one's proportion of holdings or votes in any listed company reaches, exceeds or falls below a disclosure threshold. The thresholds are 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 50%, 2/3 and 90% of the number of voting rights or shares in a company.

So ur saying all corporation who buys into a share have to declare? And if they buy certain nunber of share in one go u have to declare...omg u got alot of learning to doo.

So ur comments clearly indicates ur lack of understanding of the basics unfortunately .. NOFear has already posted rns when they held at 5% plus and he spoke to some specialist who also Confirmed a sell. U only notify once threshold is cross I.e 5% to less than 1%....imho its a sell. Don't get me wrong, am invested here but concerned

Dixy, am not sure whether u have ever read a holding rns before. Why would u rns a holding of 0.77% holding please explain? If so, why haven't all the holders here ns'd our holdings ?? Why haven't I seen an rns for ur holdings ?

Squid comments and doesn't invest ha what a joke, he goes a share is incredibly cheap to then not invest. I may have a brain of a pea but I wasn't born yesterday. Squid has an agenda imho

Squid seems to deramping cine and ramping capita ha. I would rather be in cine if I had the option after holding rns of a sale yesterday in capita imho

R&M loosing the assets to be redeemed EQUATE to £2.8m of the company's annualised revenue... u still think they in need of money. They're just going to loose a client and revenue of £2.8m and thats only when or if notice is executed....imho

If u read properly for goodness sake., R&M loosing the assets to be redeemed equate to £2.8m of the company's annualised revenue,

I don't know about u, if I needed money, I would sell investment where am already in profit and hold onto ones that am at a loss at to atleast breakeven. And wait out 2 weeks if I was confident on result imho

Just abit nervous now, sat at a huge loss..don't know where this is going. Shorts have increased, n the sell rns yesterday, also how serco sp dropped on what i thought was good results. Sleepless nights imho

Again imho on below

If they needed money, from all their investment they decided to sell capita? Really! it reads further down, Its and intention of redemtion, its the start of a long process that could take months. only I could understand if it was their only investment to sell. If they were confident on results, holding for 2 weeks more could have reduces their losses assuming they were confident on the result. And reduce impact on there financials.

Exactly my point Dave, talking of results, as I mentioned before. Serco's results from my understanding saw increase in revenue and profit and increase in dividend and it dropped on result day and to still be lower than start of the week even after Fridays rise. The sector seem to be soo unloved

Okay but why? before results would ii sell? They could reduce their losses if results turn out to be good by waiting couple of weeks longer, they've held this long to now bail ...doesn't make sense

All in my opinion below

So they bought around 46p in June 2020, held for 2 years and sold around 29p at a loss of 58%...to what? fund a lucrative investment. Really!! And the opportunity cost lost over the 2 years. Wasn't there many lucrative investment opportunity in the past 2 years to sell up to do it now. The selling of their holding makes any nieve investor look like a pro.

Just wondering why River and Mercantile Asset Management  were holding 5% plus shares and at a profit when this was around 50p to then sell at a loss now? Just before result too? They couldav recovered their losses if the results are good or are they fearing the worse. Why after holding for soo long to bail now?

U don't declare less than 1 %...it went from above 5% holding to less than 1%

That looks like a sale to mee.