RE: I'm Optimistic3 Feb 2018 20:08
NoEasy, i've just looked at the TMX video Q&A. I agree, this looks like a pivotal moment and a major breakthrough could be on the cards. The question posed is "Biggest Challenges" to which the answer, as we all know is resettlement of 330 house or 1,000 people. MC says, "we have a couple of back up plans to get around the resettlement". In other words the mine goes ahead without resettlement. He owns 10% of Condor directly and indirectly and of course is going to do what it takes to get a mine permitted. As CEO he is living this 24/7 unlike the rest of us armchair generals who have other jobs and comment from the comfort of the UK. He gets it that value is unlocked with permits. What are the options for a mine with no resettlement?
1) smaller pit, redesigned access ramps, but still the same annual production, which has 80,000 oz gold in the PFS or 100,000 oz gold in the Whittle optimisation, but a shorter mine life of say 7 years not 9 years.
2) Add feeder pits of 100k to 160k on America and 60k on Central Breccia and what about one on Mestiza? As i have pointed out, the 6,000m drill last year on Tatiana vein discovered a high grade ore shoot, of 150k oz at 10g/t gold. perhaps the first 80m can be a feeder pit?
3) so, 3 possible feeder pits of an aggregate 300k oz gold or conservatively 200k oz recovered gold or an additional 40k oz gold pa for 5 years
4) 120k to 150k oz per annum from open pits for 5 years
5) outside the pits there is underground circa 1M oz gold, the recent powerpoint says underground can be expanded by 900k oz with 20,000m drilling. recovered gold from underground 1m to 1.2m oz or another 100k oz gold per annum.
6)All this without 200k oz in 4 satellite deposits open along strike and to depth and a touted 5M oz gold district
My bet is that the Government has been presented with a scenario to proceed without resettlement, thus removing the major obstacle to permits.