Member Info for AgArCu

I think this is game over, slug. You haven't replied to any of the times I've pointed out you were wrong. You try to move the conversation on, to change the subject, and I gladly will, but first you need to admit you were wrong about a simple, easily checked fact about the temperature in Sicily last week. It's really not that hard. You were wrong- you can just say it.

Stick to the whipping you're currently getting. You said it wasn't hotter than mid 30s I'm Sicily. Was this true or false for last week? Just click the link I sent, I've made it easy for you.

You thought there was only one weather station im Sicily, didn't you?

Pick any forecaster you like. Their methods are on their website.

48C predicted, 46.5C measured. Not the mid-30s you claimed. Are you saying you were correct to claim Sicily hadn't got up to the high 40s? Sluggy, you're rumbled. You didn't do enough research (story of this BB) and it was easy to disprove your incorrect ramblings.

How temperature is measured is largely irrelevant to the colour coding of weather charts and forecasts, which is completely arbitrary anyway. Want to make 35C blue so people think it's chilly? Be my guest.

Let us return to what we're actually talking about though (no getting of the hook for this sluggy bait!)

You said the ESA predicted 48C in Sicily last week. Then you tried to claim evidence of scaremongering by pointing out that last week's high temps for Sicily were in the mid-30s. Then I realised you'd just googled 'weather Sicily last week', clicked on the first link, which didn't include the hottest temperatures recorded in Sicily, and come here to paste said link. When I pointed out that it had reached well over 46C in Sicily (not a difficult bit of research!) and therefore the ESA were correct in their predictions (within tolerance) you went quiet on the matter. Anything wrong there?! 😂 You are too easy to beat, slug- maybe take an evening class or something?

No no, slug, you have to admit that the ESA and all of their clever scientists were right, and you don't know anything about meteorology or weather. Come on now, suck it up big boy. Admit your error.

Oh my word, you can't even use basic logic. One thing to be taken in by the tin hat brigade based on their pseudo science and behavioral tricks, but you have lost the thread of your own argument!

The ESA can measure what they like - you said they were incorrect for predicting the temperature in Sicily would be 48C last week. It was over 46.5C in the event (well within tolerance for a forecast). The website you sent a link to uses air temperature! So I ask you, once again, to admit that you just googled weather in Sicily last week and jumped on the first numbers you found, without considering that there are multiple weather stations in the area. Just admit your mistake and we'll move one!

Slug, we can't carry on my lecture until you admit that it was nearly 48C in Sicily last week, and that the ESA were therefore right and you just didn't think to check more than one town. Come on, own your stupid rather than trying to deflect.

I'm happy to school you on COVID, too, but let's clear up your original mistake (today) first 👍

Gosh, slug, I didn't realize how deep the stupid went. It's all the way through you, isn't it.

Tell me: is there more than one place in Sicily? Do you think that, perhaps, the ESA know this little known fact too? And when they said it might reach 48C in Sicily (we are agreed that anything above 41C is closer to their estimate than your BS) they were referring to '48C somewhere in Sicily'?

Like saying 'the UK could reach 40C' and it reaches 38 I'm London, but you say it's only 28 in Wick? As I say, you're thick as treacle.

https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/italy/catania/historic

Great point slug, Saturday (last week) was only 46.5C, which is barely 7C hotter than the usual summers high temp. It's probably nothing and we should probably trust the oil companies and put our feet up... There are some smart climate change deniers out there, who understand the underlying science and can therefore sound credible. You a not one of these, and neither do you seem to read their 'research'. Lol.

Are you counting the first 500m years when the earth didn't have a solid crust in your calculations, sluggy? 🤣 Because, whilst there were no ice caps then, there was also 90+% CO2 in the atmosphere, and not a lot of life. I'd gladly let you visit somewhere like that and see how you get on?

You're as think as treacle but sadly we have to live on the same planet. Don't worry though, I think I take out more carbon dioxide through offset than you can produce in even your worst year. For each day you argue this claptrap on here I'll have my foundation pay to plant another 5 trees 🤣👍

Why does slug pick things that are so easy to disprove?

Temperature in Catania on Monday was 47.6C. As in: 48C to 2 significant figures.

What a moron.

Thank goodness, slug.

Catch you after your next ban

"The difference between an SP of 16p vs 25p is huge."

This is the kind of razor sharp insight we come here for. 🤌Kat gets today's prize 🤣

Jesus wept.

I'm really not sure what you mean. I can't have admitted to being anyone else- this is my first account. Perhaps I agreed with a random accusation sarcastically in the early days- I don't recall that though. On first joining I didn't realize the scale of other people getting banned, so didn't know that some posters return.

It's just me, add. And if I call you sweetheart or poppet, I'm afraid it doesn't make you special. We do that quite a lot round here.

Anyway, conspiracy theories abound today. A 2% drop on the share price (just noice) has got Kat claiming there is a strategy at play, involving posters on this BB! Might need to apply Occam's razor to cut through that hedge of stupid 🤣

Add, I finally get it! Do you think I had a different alias before? Interested to hear who you thought I was. That would explain why you carry so much baggage and would also explain some of the random things you've directed my way! I get it now.

I am ex-army, I do run a construction firm mostly staffed by ex-service people. As for everything else you've posted? 🤷‍♂️ Utter insanity.

This morning I pointed out that Fort's attempted ramp massively UNDER valued our shares, but clearly reading isn't your strength? And you're fixated on a former poster, so that might explain your lack of nuance?

Who are the derampers, Kat, and how do you think their presence denotes a strategy? Also, who are the strategists? Sounds like a conspiracy theory to me. Does your theory imply that people posting on here change sentiment in this share? Seems quite far fetched.

I think people can post with impunity, confident that it is the market at large judging solg, not individuals reading this board 👍

Curry, you are right, and you don't even even know the half of it as a new poster. We have this one fool, who calls himself 'slug' who is so stupid he doesn't understand temperature, and thinks human made global warming is part of some long con to take his wealth from him! Ridiculous, isn't it?! Stick around and he will raise his stupid skull out of the trench again, to get taken out by anyone with more than half a brain.

In the meantime, another day goes past when someone forgot to tell the market that we're about to get cut a big cheque by a friendly, charitable investment arm of the Chinese state...🤷‍♂️

I answered my own question? So you are a spineless failure? Thought as much 👍🤣

On every front?! Which fronts are you talking about? I appreciate that you're posting here rather than talking to people, I suspect if you weren't old you'd get an asd diagnosis, but this is bordering on rude, Quady. Wind your neck in.

Of course I want people to invest, don't be silly. But I want them to spend hours, days, even weeks reading about the risks here, and understanding the long time line, before doing so. I wouldn't want anyone to dive in based on Fort's brainless, irrelevant rubbish. Would you? Callous if you do: the poor people investing based on the rampers here would believe they are going to get a payout in the next few months.

Novice do you have any shame in real life or is it the same as on here? Just a reminder that you staked your reputation on a totally baseless ramp, got called out, and agreed that when you were shown to be wrong, 4 days later, you'd leave forever. How is that going?

Prediction: embarrassed chump claims to 'see green lines' because he can't explain his lack of spine.

Are Reuters lying? Walk me through this madness!