Member Info for aerial

pi
I don't think it makes it look any more worrying, and I did say "doubtful I would think". What has changed is the price of coal in countries south of Tanzania as identified by Kibo with their new project in Botswana and Mozambique. I don't know if it is even possible or viable to export coal from the Sumbawanga region of Tanzania to SA, and until we receive some figures we genuinely don't know if Edenville are capable of doing so even if it were possible. imo

Gillie2
Would you not agree that a fruitless exercise in-light of the Tanzanian Government having ultimate control over the issue or denial of Mining License's ?

Surely while seeking answers from Tanesco with regards to the Tender failure should we not be even quieter in our pursuit of a ML of any colour, instead of ruffling the TGov feathers, as without a licence we are going nowhere imho

suratosa
There are some that purchased before the March 2018 low, so are in profit. I think from memory my lowest buy was 0.019 or 1.9 pre/post consolidation.

I take Great heed from Mark Slades words, and twice now to my knowledge he has mentioned 'a re-rate' which I don't think he would dare suggest if he didn't mean it, or think it to be a very great possibility.

The will always be sells with any rise in any stock, but with regards to 1k sells, 1k imo is a nice round figure and possibly the type of trade by (per se) a day trader.

Irrespective of that I think it will take very little to move us, and any good forward moving news, especially from the USA could cause the aforementioned re-rate.

All imo pdyor

Bannor
My sentiment exactly, as you know!

Banor - Always balanced!

I personally really wouldn't want to prejudge Edenville's thinking in the
position they current find themselves. Guess we will know fairy soon..

JohnZ
They would surely need to consolidate before an offer/placing, no question there in my mind.

sgee
And likewise to you with your investment!

My post wasn't directed particularly at you, it's comments that have been accumulating. I can list a very great deal of positives, and things the company has achieved in the face of adversit, but sadly they have pretty much been snuffed out by the failure of anything achieved to raise, or stop the decline of the SP. Until we get something in black and white etc...

pi
From memory of a recent conversation with Rufus, the South Africa company registration is there to help with our trade in SA. I didn't manage to find out what that means, but what I understand to be the case in the country's south of TanZ is that coal prices are at a premium. Could he be considering exporting to SA?, doubtful I would think, but clearly they are looking (like Kibo) to diversify.

JohnZ
I'm sure you have read the below articles and watched the proactive video plus
the plethora of information out there. The only news lacking imho is RNS'ed news.

JohnZ
So am I on good news, but that wasn't the question.
A fall to the nominal value would suggest bad news or a placing.

Why would anyone that hasn't offered a single positive word in a very long time (possibly never) be considering buying if the company fall to its nominal value?

That would suggest what has been posted (like dead by Christmas/going into liquidation etc) is not what you actually believe!. ???

Everything we have seen and been told suggests real potential imo. My only
slight criticism are the gaps between RNS'd news, but do feel a RNS is close.

Nice find, nice article!

JohnZ
sail creeping..

JohnZ
There is no excuse for lies. No more lies, no issue!

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/stocktube/12537/location-sciences-group-plc---elevator-pitch-12537.html

this early on a Monday morning - Quite encouraging !!

Sort of defeats the object don’t you think larry reading members posts that you have on filter. No I don’t know that is the case, as I don’t use the filter. I like to hear what everyone has to say, this after all this is a board for discussion. Filtering is childish and shows your ignorance, the only person that has ever suggested that they are unable to have a discussion on this ‘wholly inadequate board is hiding behind the filter.

I don’t think LSE have rules on lying, but if they did you’d probably be at the top of the leaders board!!

Larry your Friday 13:40 post...

"Seany - I cant even see who you’re addressing as I
have certain people on filter but it’s not hard to guess"

Lie after lie after lie!

Seems your filter list is another figment of your imagination larry! or is it 'speculative' ?..