RE: Does anybody think this will hit 0.05 by 202224 Nov 2020 13:13
Sausage you have just done exactly the same again!, exactly what you accused Mr N of?..
You’ve changed what I said which was your original comment. I’m not sure what part you don’t understand? I’m not trying to discredit you, and I haven’t trawled your posts I remember you indignantly saying it of the shareholders conversation with the bod at the time, although I did look back to find the exact quote.
You posted in May that: “Unfortunately idle chit chat at AGMs isn’t valid, if Edenville aren’t prepared to put it in a RNS then it is just chit chat”....
Earlier today you said: “Having a conversation with the board of directors at the AGM is perfectly valid” ?????
Now, again today you say: “So do you really think that "idle chit chat at AGMs" is valid? There's a difference between idle chit chat and having a conversation, surely even you can see that”
That is exactly my point, sadly you don’t even seems know what you said two hours ago let alone 6months ago.
It was you that labelled the bod shareholder “conversation” “ invalid idle chitchat” lol
Read my Mon 23:27 post below again, it was about your response at the time about a conversation (emphasis on the word ‘conversation’) between the Edenville board of directors and shareholders at the AGM.
My post:
“Sausage believes that a conversations between the Edenville board of directors at an AGM if not RNS’ed is invalid idle chitchat. Yet he is seemingly happy to ask for invalid information about Edenville’s current status from a complete stranger on an anonymous bb”
So the conclusion is you think a conversation between the bod and shareholders at the AGM is both valid and invalid!..
Another example of “Saying what suits,(at the time) but not necessarily the truth”
Sign In
Follow the stocks
