Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
This board will soon be populated by rampers. No doubt at all. Look at the increase in the big block trades. Big ups and big down. For anyone following these boards hoping for trading advice...... Learn the basics of charting and buy the dips. The really big dips here.
I am interested in your description of PF as a canny operator.
If that is so, then why has he had one finger plugging a hole in a leaking ferry and the other up his nyash for the last 7 years or so without a contract?
(Also been here since the days of Riddler the Fiddler and HH (who was the same as Haroldharalda?) Fry up (before he changed his name to that one). In Fact I am stuck here massively underwater because of gullibility to what Riddler and HH spouted all those years ago). Hey ho. It may happen here but please dont tell me PF is a smooth operator. He is a turnip.
"In conjunction with this loan facility and in order to deepen the orphan drug expertise in Venn it has been agreed that certain boad changes will be made, with immediate effect...... a subscriber to £108,642 loan notes (and associated warrants over 657,285 shares); ......a principal of Raglan Capital Limited.....will join the board of Venn"
If you look at the comment I made the day that RNS came out. If you let "a principal of Raglan Capital Limited" onto a board, then this is what will happen. However, we are not done yet. They will take this further down with impunity as they now know all announcements that will be made ahead of the market. As Westminster did with Cannacord. As has been done countless times with AIM companies.
Finance people cannot be allowed to have market sensitive information ahead of the curve. This is what happens.
We are continually being told that we are absolutely on the cusp of all these big contracts and we are just awaiting the annoucement of X and we can get the Iran contract and the other big contract will be announced any minute. By Christmas etc.
Any big hitters; financial heavyweights etc should have been in place 18 months ago for the negotiations of all these imminent contracts. Bringing in and paying for a new raft of skilled people would suggest that we were previously seriously under skilled when these negotiations were being undertaken or that we are in serious need of help now i.e. these other contracts are no where near finalised?
Taking on new management at this point, to me, is indicative of the v v poor current process management of WSG.
( I am aware the Iran contract is 'signed' )
For anyone looking at this marvellous top, I think look at a weekly chart and draw a line connecting the peaks from: Monday 14th Nov 2016; Monday 16th October and (guess what) Monday 14th January 2019. They all line up exactly as the exact point of resistance.
It topped out at 44.05 this morning. If it goes back above that today, I will be astonished. Looks good for a short to me.
Not sure I can be bothered with you anymore. I hv been polite in my interactions with you. For the record, you are not the only person to contact AB directly or the NCA. Fact. Joke or not, slander can be manipulated in a court of law. Fact. Wales, where men are men..... please!
... * ~ here * ~ BMR Watch
..... I is involved in a court case against AB then being shown to be obsessive and discussing on a public forum how to cause grevious harm to this man and his family your credibility will be hugely dimished. Think. You must always assume that AB will be informed on anything of value for or against him on this board. Ditto goes for BMRW boards.
I understand that some of you may have reservations about people involved with BMR watch. If you put that to one side, there seems to be a much better chance of us putting a strong case to the NCA or other authorities or to jlp or to the BMR board if a letter comes from a group of people that own, now, 15%, but could be 20% + of BMR shares. We could as a group of people write to jlp and say that we would sell the Royalty to them on a first refusal basis. There must be a way as a bigger group 2 at least make jlp make decisions that consider BMR shareholders. I think there is more hear that unifies us rather than what divides us. I do urge BMR shareholders here to join the Emma watch in order to try and move this forward in a way that we all agree to
I wouldn't worry too much about that. Borrelli is CB's poodle and will do as he's told. He has very little power.
I do hope that you put yourself forward to join the BMRW committee. They look like they could use your umph. There is some value of posting here but the vast majority of BMR holders do not know this board is still active and arguing with people here is pointless IMO. The imputus to get a coherent message out to BMR LTH'S will be even more important once the committee has the the mailing address of sharehoders which they were intending to do in the NY.
(jeremiah ~ re licence: maybe, but not if one now has 150k + of JLP CFD's)
I can see that multiple letters to the NCA may spotlight the dubious actions of our CEO. I have drafted such a letter.
However, I wanted others opinions as to whether any intervention of the NCA i.e. a possible halt of future payments to BS may lead to BMR defaulting on its agreement with BS and JLP which might lead to a retraction of the mining licence etc. This may be counterproductive in that losing the licence again may kill off BMR as a company completely and be detrimental to those of us that have now invested in JLP in the hope of recouping some of our losses
Last year, figures were for 53 weeks to 3rd December and no specific RNS for
Christmas figures. I was hoping someone might know of a site where they might be released. I know TSCO release xmas gigs on 10th January. Keeeeeep looking
Sounds like you are now out of this? Well done if you are. With my junior chartist hat on.... This RNS will probably stop this share sliding down to the 7.2p major support line that it was clearly heading for. It has hit a telling moving average line and stayed. Will it continue up from here? I doubt. There is a small bit of headway for today but after that it will be squeezed down again (see weekly chart). So does this RNS serve the purpose of creating an up and down holding pattern around this SP? yes, I I think so. Otherwise, the cold January days when few are watching tend to be a fortuitous time for groups to take it down, down, and down. We have been miraculously saved! It is almost biblical.
..... and yet... I wonder if SP Angel and TC actually demand to see a copy of a draft long term service contract to satisfy their due diligence obligations to shareholders that they have verified claims made in the RNS? As Wpa5 says, better to have said RNS than not have it. However, my gut feeling always veers towards the foxy side of the track in my assessment of where we actually are. Right now. Not next year. Is the SP above its Nominal value? Am I any closer to getting my head above water? I'm sure 2019 will be our year. Beyond our wildest dreams! Happy Christmas and a wonderful 2019.
While AB is in charge of a private company he can do what he wants and he will. He will use the time between now and relisting to sell the assets he needs to buy some old pile of shite that will keep him employed for as long as he can. While BMR watch have a much smaller share base than JLP we cannot strong arm him at all. Berating AB is pointless as he was put there by CB to do as he is told. You hv said previously that you own several million shares. Verify your shares to BMRW and voice your opinions via the shutterfly board. Othwrwise it is all pointless. I have previously said that threatening AB via emails is, but in my opinion, pointless.
Being Mr. Angry from Tumbridge Wells as an individual is a waste of time.
Many moons ago, with massive reserves above ground; licenses painstakingly obtained; plant photos online etc. this was exciting. You must understand that the victims of Botocelli are no more than bystanders that are too far underwater from the atrocities of the previous tief tief.
Rofert, I have seen your tactics on many boards and will be leave it there.
I would like to use this board to encourage genuine shareholders to sign up to bmr watch shutterfly. com.
I feel that LTH's of BMR shares deserve their money back. A larger BMR watch shareholder percentage would enable a voice to compete with that of JLP who is intent on absorbing all remaining parts of BMR.
That is my only plan here. If you are not a BMR shareholder and you are posting on a de listed company BB then you must have a purpose.
You are either very vindictive, very caustic or very unoccupied.