Member Info for addicknt

BSR,

1) Having clicked on the link '84 provided I can assure you it's not dodgy.

2) It covers the period around the time of your post and the nearest to 12:16, which was the time of your post, was a trade at 12:09 and the bid price was 11.26 and the offer was 11.4. The next trade was at 12:19 and the same bid/offer spread was in place. This is not by any stretch of the imagination a wide spread. In fact it's a tight as a gnats chuff.

This is not an opinion, it's fact. In your desperate attempt to trash this stock you posted something which was demonstrably false and even more amusing is the fact you've continued to argue that you were right. You should follow the old saying; when you're in a hole stop digging.

So, even when the evidence is put in front of you ('84 at 14:06) you still deny it?

BSR, I posted fact. You did not, as '84's post demonstrated beyond all doubt.

I don't know what your motivation was for turning up here, other than it being distinctly odd, but if you think you're involved in some great caped crusader campaign to save us from ourselves, I'm afraid you're wasting your time.

'84, why was your post removed?

You posted your nonsense at 12:16, I responded at 12:25. And no, the spread wasn't wide at 12:16, it hadn't been wide at all during the morning. It's all still there in your thread. You were trying to scaremonger - again - and you were rumbled.

Because you evidently know very little about this company and have only recently appeared to give us all the benefit of your wisdom, you'll be unaware of the fact the spread here is rarely significant.

Your post implied this fictional wide spread indicated many sellers - it didn't and volume was actually low on that day. If you're going to post asinine nonsense, I suggest you check your facts beforehand.

BSR, you are wrong. I checked at the time and posted on the thread at the time. You were lying.

As for your second point - I don't know. Do you?

So says the man who claimed there was a massive spread and that this was a sign of a huge sell-off. Sadly for him, the truth was the spread was less than 1%, as it is at the moment. Of course, when this fact was pointed out to him he scuttled back under his rock. So perhaps he'd like to answer his own point; "But they will NEVER address the question". Go on, address your own egregious lie.

Metoooo, my reference to this being a blueprint relates to the structure of the deal between two existing shareholders, not value, although it will provide a benchmark.

According to Filo's own presentation, Cascabel is the fifth largest undeveloped deposit in the world and, as we know, that doesn't include Tandy etc. The idea this won't be attractive to either our existing shareholders or another party is, to my mind, for the fairies.

That's not how the world works, as I'm sure you know.

Our strategy is crystal clear and, as affrm says, our time will come.

BP, thanks for posting. Am I right in thinking Filo is not as advanced as we are and is not as big?

Is this transaction a blueprint for our future?

'The desperation is palatable'. Classic!

Eloro, I thought you were looking forward to showing your appreciation of SC at the next AGM?

DBW, as I said the other day, your discussion (and BBG's) put flesh on the bones and we can now see clearly what he's trying to achieve.

As far as Cascabel is concerned, I guess the key questions is; how far down the line will interested parties want/need us to progress before they make a move?

Eloro, indeed he did, which is why he got sent to the sin bin. Your other points are equally valid.

CMG, you're right, the word Jewish is not derogatory but the term 'Jew Boy' most certainly is, particularly when used in a personal attack on an individual. So as far as 'education' goes, it's very much you who needs it.

Nal, did you contact the company to ask if DBW and BBG had actually spoken to them? Thought not - you're afraid of the answer.

You're so stupid you don't even understand the implications of your own words. How you escaped a permanent ban is beyond me.

Irwin's main contribution appears in episode 2. Although most people are familiar with the BreX scandal, there are many interesting observations about how people conducted their dd, particularly WI.

For example, the process which revealed the scam was when Freeport, as part of their dd, drilled holes adjacent to the holes which BreX had claimed contained the stellar grades of gold. The results yielded no gold and the game was up.

I'm sure many of you already knew this is what happens, but I didn't, although I was aware WI reported that various parties in the data room had done it at Cascabel. Clearly, the results stacked up.

Despite his dd Irwin still went ahead and invested, but escaped by the skin of his teeth. He bought at $18 per share and sold at $220, making a multi-million dollar return.

I thoroughly recommend this podcast, it really is a great piece of journalism and is a fascinating story.

Already listened to it, The six billion dollar gold scam on BBC Sounds is a fascinating documentary about BreX. Irwin features quite a bit and is very interesting.

Barrick's behaviour was pretty shoddy, but it shows what goes on.

And before anyone says it, we are not BreX any more than we are Sirius.

What on earth are you talking about? The spread is tiny, as it is most of the time.

Nal, do you realise just how easy it would be for you to check-out their claims? I'm 100 % convinced SC wouldn't want his name used in vain and I'm sure he'll either confirm or deny that these discussion actually took place. If you can't reach Scott, Chris will answer as will Sean.

Stop being a lazy ar5e and do some of your own research for once; go on, give it a go. And when you've done so come back on here and tell us you findings (there would be no point lying as we'll simply ask for confirmation from the company)