RE: Company structures and license ownership19 Sep 2023 09:40
@GeorgeH1987
Hainan has already 51% of KMUK, no completion of financing package needed to realize that.
KMUK will be the developer of the “Bougouni Lithium project”. This project is one (1) exploitation licence and three (3) “Recherche” licences/permits. So 4 licences in total. KMUK funding package is to develop the complete Bougouni project, not only Foulaboula.
KMUK funding is $65million for DMS, $29.34Million for extra development and $5.66Million as a loan to partially repay to Kodal the loan from Kodal to KMUK representing capital invested by Kodal in the development of Bougouni to date.
“Licence area modified during 2020 to account for the future Foulaboula Mining Licence” was needed to optimize the Foulaboula Exploitation area in order to have all known exploitable assets from the JORC in this Exploitation licence, nothing else. Not to keep licenses out of the exploitation licence but you can not have more than 1 license on an area/asset
After the Xinmao purchase of 2,937,801,971 they will be close to 14.72% of Kodal Minerals but this will go down to +/-14,40% once the BOD takes their warrants/options/extra shares and once production starts even further down to +/- 14,00%. Unless Xinmao buys more shares this will go down to even under 14%
KMUK (49% Kodal Minerals/51 % Xinmao) will be the owner of all the licenses via the Malian subsidiary LMLB in which the Malian gov can take a percentage. (10% free and a possible 10 % extra at an agreed price) The 49/51 relation between Kodal Minerals and Xinmao can only change after an agreement between these two parties an possible others (new parties) but never with the Malian Gov
All assets from the 3 “Recherche” licences can being added to the Exploitation Licence if needed to exploit them.
DYOR
GLA