RE: 32 Mil11 Jun 2019 11:16
Correct the RTO could be anything, it could completely avoid the companies Antos is involved in, it could be useless and underwhelming, to bring nothing to shareholders. But yet we are all 'holders'.
Names are irrelevant, I mean wtf is 'uber' or Next for a company name. The fact that, that means anything, gets me.
Why does anyone invest in a company such as this with very many possible uncertainties, huge risk of an underwhelming takeover target, mass placing, an obsolete name.
I mean if someone approached me on the streets of San Fran and said give me money lets do a new cab business and he wants to call it Uber. You'd probably laugh yourself to the hospital, until you wake up from coma and see the company valued at over 50 billion mcap.
People invest and think themselves smart, when the price drops they panic and blame others.
Unless your shorting a stock, looking for its blatant faults while not invested does raise eyebrows. Life is short concentrate on where you can make gains not where you think you cant.
But yes, this is aim, and this could all end up a mess.
There, I hope I managed to hit the sweet spot for all: rampers, derampers, day traders, LTH and the bitter who could have bought much lower.
Meanwhile, Antos Glogowski is still buying. My money's on him.