Member Info for A_E_Marsh

"Number of Buys must equal number of sells on average, even if the MM is holding lots or goes naked for a period."

Over simplification. Crossed trades cover uneven movement.

If they were all equal the price would never change. There would be no demand or no over-supply, precisely the things that cause price fluctuation.

Actually showing more buys than sells now. Still down ten per cent. Makes sense......

Sometimes I worry for Zak.

Thanks, stargate. Good to get technical info occasionally.

508M sold

48(?)M bought.

Up 9 per cent!

Could be bedandisa. Especially possible as the doubled amounts are the same.

Very polite Zak. Well, that looks possible with some good news. I don't have as many as you but I've got mine down from 840ish to 290ish.

After being here for years I could have baled at a small profit recently, but I've gone so long it's become a habit.

Zak, without giving any specific figures, you told us you bought a load more quite recently.

You must have reduced you average, if nothing else.

Good God, all it took was a mere 95K more buys than sells to give us this vast increase.

I shall celebrate with a cup of tea at the all night caff on the Wimborne by-pass.

Drop like a stone if Starmer is elected. No doubt, always does with those numpties from Labour.

"I encourage everyone on here to switch from tory to reform UK."

While you are at it why not encourage them to switch from Labour to Reform too?

I would!!

Yeah 24 more shares sold than bought, little man.

It got busy last night. I missed it all, some good points, I'll add this.

Don't approach any court action with the view that one party is definitely wrong, nor with the belief that a judge will have the same desire to teach a lesson to the person you want taught a lesson, no matter what the finding.

An acceptance that law has nothing to do with justice, honesty, fairness, decency or common sense is also mainly found to be accurate. Hoping for the best.

" If u don't think all this Candy/Bonnier stuff has anything to do with Boom ur naïve at best, "

Tell me Zak, as for some reason you have chosen to get me in your sights, tell me, when have I ever mentioned Bonnier or Candy in any of my posts over the about 9 years that I have been a holder here?

Apart from this one post, when Zak?

Zak, What the Hell difference does it make where any of us here, now, this year?

If it makes you feel great, I'm happy for you, massage your ego, it does me no damage.

Look mate, Bother me about who is right WHEN I SELL!!!

That's ALL THAT MATTERS.

OK?

Rhetorical OK, ok?

I think he is invested, long term, like me, back before the 1 - 100 consolidation.

He probably made a genuine mistake, but does appear to like to be taken very seriously.

You got an honest response from a person who thought differently you, which is perfectly valid on a forum. You got all uppity at not being worshipped for your pearls of wisdom.

You also said you wouldn't be posting here anymore.

Remember?

2p?????.... SUPERTROLL!! (LOL)

Steven49, are you paid for the amount of trolling you do? I imagine you only get 50 per cent on your cut and pastes.

Could you please post a link to a job application because I also enjoy being a miserable little bleeder.

Sometimes buys show as sells and vice versa. I believe it was a buy, as Zac says.

You can listen to a podcast in the car driving to work or home, in the kitchen cooking tea, etc,etc. You can't watch a video. Each has their own strengths and weaknesses, if you chose to ignore those to promote the benefits of your favourite, that's up to you.

It's also exactly the thing you are accusing others who disagree with you of doing.

""...it is about supplying video content...""

Wouldn't that be, "Videoboom"?

404.. that was a damned good Peugeot!