Chris Heminway, Exec-Chair at Time To ACT, explains why now is the right time for the Group to IPO. Watch the video here.
"You need your head checked because you’re wanting this down to 150p when you stated your average or you bought at £10. Don’t think you know how dumb you sound."
He borrowed at £10. He's a shorter mate. Think about ti, that is the only logical explanation for his behaviour. He's just told you HIS target price to get out.
""I wonder how many of candies mates are trolling this board so that they can fill their shorts also""
Thousands Mr Mitty, thousands. You can read their copious posts here day after day. Us genuine investors get lost in the dross.
"He hasn't got better."
Candy or not, the share price did and you could have sold out at 22 quid.
Do any of the people you quote post here on LSE?
WE are the ones being accused. I DID NOT ramp. You may have paid to get rumours up. (See how stupid these arguments get?)
If you did, I don't even care. That's all the past, I'm interested in now and the future.
I am being accused, by a serial liar, of doing something I have not done. I will always fight my corner especially against dishonest people. They are weak and always losers in the end.
I leave rolling over to the wimps. Just like I leave looking back to fools.
A good day for BOOM today, but don't let it put a smile on your face!
"You were ramping this at every level higher and some of you at £20"
No, we weren't. People were happy (Surprise, surprise). It was the rumours in the press that drove this high. Not share-holders.
Plus which, if there were rampers, you are as bad as a de-ramper, just the opposite end of the scale. Either way, it's liars.
Still can't give any "figures" can you?
404x, What's your problem?
I was perfectly polite to you the other day when you were silly enough to take a comment I had made to somebody else as referring to you when, as I explained, and as you will have seen, I wasn't.
So.. What's the gripe? BTW, I don't live in "woodwork"? OK?
""If that's a reply to me I've invested here, try reading again it wasn't a comment about the company but just about Bonnier""
No mate, it wasn't, so I don't need to read it again. Beware anonymous people on the internet giving themselves a name that they think confers authority on them. It can be a sign of a person prepared to con others, as I think is proven in this case.
I thought it was obvious who I was addressing but it seems it wasn't. It should be now though!