Member Info for 962962

Smartinvestment.Your theory 100% bang on.

Serves em right.

Tav,thks for quick reply
Again I know this topic was well questioned at the time,did your broker admit to knowing about the meeting,and just not bother advising you,or did, as mine did,admit to being advised of a meeting,but not knowing the agenda or reasons for the meeting being called did not advise.
ie we know there is a meeting,we don't what it is for or about,so we can't really tell you anything we don't know ourselves.

Tav.How are you doing mate.We had many chats on this board late 2018/early 2019,re broker failings.Just so i am clear,thre are 2 isssues that raised concern for all holders.
1.The failure to advise holders of the move from a premium to standard listing circa mid December 2018
2.The recomended offer of 1p per share circa 11 Jan.

Which of the above,or was it both,that your ombudsman ruling/compensation payment refers to

Ironic.Worse for ware or not,you've been on here long enough to know the facts." Yes vote gives 1p a share",only if the vote is carried,for clarity in your drunken state,Vote yes and the majority vote yes its 1P,Vote yes and the majority vote no and it's 0p.Vote no and the majority is yes you still get 1p,no and the majority is no 0P.I've voted no already,loosing 1P will at least let me sleep at night.

Tav Dont also forget there are innocent people here who may not draw a pension for many years.There pension contributions are being invested by the pension providers who have also taken a "hit".

With Mesa Air now involved,will this bring attention from the US financial authorities.
Don't forget Mesa Air is also known as American Eagle,a big internal feeder service for American Airlines.

Freedom!.Perhaps it's to replace the ones that have/or are running to the hills.Without any doubt there are plenty jumping before they are pushed.

Tav.Who is responsible for advising the brokers regarding votes etc.Is it the company(FLYBE) or the london stock exchange.Whoever it is, I would assume it's a general "Round Robin" same wording etc,to everyone.If thats the case are we reliant on some jobsworth at each individal broker to make their own interpretation of whats in front of them.

inuendo.You did specify to Halifax that your query was for the upcoming vote,and not the past divestment vote.

All on here should be made to read toastal's post.Having worked in the aviation/airline industry myself for 44 years,he is bang on from my experience.

compass "if the large holders "IIs" vote yes then what????.Are they all going to vote yes?Are all PI's going to vote no?
Mr Tinkler holds what,12%.would you class him as an II or a PI,which way will he vote.The 64000 dollar question me thinks.

Moniman.There is a lot of rhetoric on this board about how people intend to vote.Am I the only one who has done the deed.What you say and what you do are totally differant.

EBloch.I agree with moniman,the only difference being I have already voted NO.If there had been a guarantee that no jobs would be lost,I may well have reconsidered,but that is not the case.
As far as I know,not 1 staff member has posted on this board.If htey had they may be able to advise us of any internal mail or postings regarding their situation.As yet nothing/nobody.
What i do know,and nothing can be taken as fact from this BOD,is that the acquisition document cleatly states that there is duplication/jobs/relocation will be needed.To me that means job cuts in possible large numbers.That is in black and white.For anybody lucky enough to remain,it we be renegotiated contracts at lower pay.I've seen all this before,it's the norm.

Jerezpete.Qwety is a SCAM.He just Wants email address's,that anybody daft enough to respond,is freely giving him.
God only knows how much junk/spam mail is going to appear in their inbox shortly,but as said,they are freely giving their address out.

My vested interest is I am a holder.I've lost a good deal,but would I vote yes for a piitance,no way.

Sounds good to me.1p or ziltch,no difference.

Albundy27.Welcome to you also.I for one have been asking for weeks to get some staff input on this board.What are your views of the situation.I know that we (the shrehoders) are being made out as the villians of the piece,but deep down we are normal/considerate people,or at least I think I am.

JscottD.Welcome to this board.Regarding your wife's vote,only she/both of you can make the decision.She like us all here will have seen her share value drop,from circa 16p to 2p overnight,and without selling on the open market will see it drop to 1p or less dependant on the vote.The shares are NOT tranfering to Connect Airways.

Regarding the job security,I would check the "The Recommended proposals for the acquisition of Flybe Group plc by Connect Airways Limited" a nice 79 page document that may be available in her rest/crew room, or I think it may be available on the flybe investors site, or somewhere else on the web.The relevant point that contradicts her letter,is clearly stated on page 19,the last paragraph before point 8.It needs to be read,and circulated to staff so that they can see that the signatory of the letter,is not singing from the same hymn sheet.

Taverham.General question for you.You have stated on this board that you hold FLYBE shares with more than 1 broker.Will you have to vote with each broker for your holdings to be accepted,Also for the posters with such as the Halifax,who are voting by post,if they bought the shares at different times,and the requirement is the IVC number,that I gatther is the share certifate/purchase number,would they have to vote by tranche,or assume the broker would lump each tranche together for 1 Total.Just curious,I like to learn.