Member Info for 962962

Tav,C'mon mate,your memory must be goin.i'm sure it was you who I sent this to on Sunday:

" Extract from my broker reply (not HL) received FridayFor info also had to follow up after initial fob off.

"In your first email you asked if we were notified on your behalf of the proposals to move from a premium to standard listing. I can confirm that we were not advised of this proposal. I have looked back at what information we received into the Corporate Actions department from the London Stock Exchange and can see that all we received was the date of the meeting that was held on 14 December 2018 but the proposals were not detailed. As a result, we were therefore not provided with any details to suggest that your shareholding would be affected. If we had been, we would have written to inform you accordingly. "

Broker Share.com by the way.

exetr.Sorry, just noticed he's in the heading.
Also.just for confirmation.I do agree with your thoughts about him.

exetr.On a light note,this must the first post when you are slateing people that Brady has not been mentioned.Has this guy hurt you in the past.

windingdown/inuendo.Are we talking about the "1p offer vote".If we are for clarity I received the nice 76 page Recomended proposals for acquisition paperwork yesteday DIRECT AND BY POST.I assume this is because I and all shareholders are on the reister of holders held by London Stock Exchange.As I do not hold the share certificate,presumably this is held by the broker,again I would assume it is they who will advise by regarding your voting preference by some means.As I only received this yesterday,it may well be brokers are still waiting this,or working it through their system,so I am giving them a few working days to sort out,and if nothing received will be on the phone to give "em a right bollockin".I want this vote as a matter of principle.

Having said that,my broker clearly advised that re the divestment vote,they didn't advise me,because they were not advised.In my thoughts the reason it sailed through easily.

Keep tour eyes on this guys,we've been duped once,lets make sure it doesn't happen again.

All IMO of course,but would welcome comments from other posters.

Second,third and fourth rounds on me

Bruce.Good choice.My broker is Share Centre.

Tav.Just a further point,your comment re HL and nothing received.Are you refering to the divestment voth or the vote in March.I got the March proposals DIRECT yesterday by post,but no pink or blue voting slip as mentioned.Checked broker site and nothing showing in voting rights/upcoming meetings.May be a bit early,so will monitor next week.

Tav.Thanks for your views,constuctive as usual.My decision is made.I'm in and I'm voting,I've lost money,so be it,no way will I grovel for a pittance,but I strongly agree that things may develop.

I still hold shares in the company,I know there are posters on this board who do not,but they also contribute advice that I find usefull.Being a holder I am now in a quandry.
1.I Can/Could sell my holding at approx double the offer price,(assuming there is no great fall Monday am),at doble the offer price.Financially possibly the best option.
2 I can hold out and vote.

Now the quandry.

If I take option 2 and vote,without any question my vote will be No,ie I will be voting for 0P and administration/Liquidation.Tough on some people,but I will have voted ethically on my part.
But the vote may be carried,the majority may not agree with my principles (as they are fully entitled to do ),so as I see/read it I will still get the 1p.Am I right or wrong.

Now we come to the nitty/gritty.It has been posted on this board that the offer price would EQUATE to 1p per share,but as share holders are always last in line,it may well be legal/advisor fees,could take a a large proportion if not the full ammount,therefore a vote for 1p,could ultimately be a vote for 0P.

View people.

alwayswinning.I for one feel you are bang on with your asumption.

Tav.Re Keith Everitt.You sure your wording correct.
My interpretation of the Rns is the sale of tranche of his shares.Capitulate/Bail seems over excessive.

Well people,I don't know about you,26% down,buys just a tad above sells,a lot better than i thought it would be at 0759 this morning.

No I most certainly do not.

Quote your post 1626."The company with such turnover should be sold for this money ."

Blackrock.Just for clarity did you miss " not " from your last post.?

Ironic.What redundancy's.People on here are saying vote yes,keep everybody in a job,Take the moralistic view when you vote.They also believe in santa claus and the tooth fairy.

Guys.Received received the war and peace prospetus this morning.Holders with a nervous disposition take care.I drops with a right thud.
It mentions pink and blue voting papers enclosed.NOTHING.
Checed online With broker for voting/Notification of meeting.NOTHING.

Maybe early,and will recheck early next week for info,but keep your eyes peeled guys/dolls.We all know what happened with the last RIGGED vote.

EBloch.First time today,we totally agree.

Ebloch.you're coming round.Your reply to strance is about 95% correct.Investors do fund the company pay roll,staff and BOD.We vote that the directors renumeration is increased because they do a good job (joke),they in turn give staff a pay rise.If the BOD pay rise was rejected,do you think the staff would have any chance of getting one.
We all invest in companies to make money,ie profit.Make a profit share price goes up,Luvly Jubly,ie fund the payroll,let em work there nadgers off and we are all happy.Make a loss,share price drops,bring in cost saving methods,ie get rid of people from payroll.

Ebloch.The figs quoted by exeterchf refer to Exeter base/HQ,as he clearly stated.
NobodyRe read his post.Virtually everybody on this board know Flybe staff total is,as you say approx 2200,split possibly 50/50.half at exeter,half around the regions.MAN/BHX have large numbers I know.
The figs are not confirmed/stated by flybe/consortium,nobody would be daft enough to do that prior to the event,but IT WILL happen for sure.

EBloch.Once again I will ask are you an employee.
" Even if 50% do loose their jobs. 50% will still have a job. " The 50% staying,will they give a toss about the 50% going,or will it be " I'm alright Jack,stuff you ?
" Why did you invest in them in the first place if you knew Flybe." because if we hadn't there would be no liquidity to pay the wages etc.

If the above ratio is correct,it may look bad that 50% are going.It's to 50% staying who will have the problem,because the is NO WAY,they will be staying on same terms/contract as they are on now.