Member Info for 805slo

No, I went back and listened to the FOG investor presentation from ten months ago. Approx 1 million (a little more) acres divided into six 200,000 acres/per piece.

Newt-

You mean SS-3H?

Https://ir.tamboran.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/24/tamboran-finalizes-the-checkerboard-of-beetaloo-basin-blocks-and-announces-us15-million-acreage-sale-to-daly-waters-energy-lp

DP it is def larger compared to what we got on March 3rd. Fingers crossed.

How convenient. Just in time to so he does not have to answer many questions by analyst other than say we just started the 30 day. Hopefully we get some savvy analyst who pepper him with questions about the delay, cause, and what is going on with the fix for our other well.

B2B-

Without good numbers from these next two wells how does FOG raise money to stay in the game? The prior plan was based on the hope good numbers would raise the stock price (currently near the all time low), change name, do a reverse split, and get on the US stock market. That has passed….so if there is an issue and TBN again screwed up what do we do to stay in the game?

No flare and no news. Something is wrong. Hope I’m wrong.

TBN reports to market.

5/2/25

https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu/?zoom=17&lat=-16.80571&lng=133.64234&themeId=DEFAULT-THEME&visualizationUrl=U2FsdGVkX1%2FPN2MX8DeGxnbau55dB4%2BEHLUQ1%2FnA3Hc%2F6YK3Qv4WPmWHhBDknSPwGVaC45ppFeOQlh%2F0lYzXMyN19GoVt8sazHmIWKRIqPGVCND5V57NuO8zHxIHUd5D&datasetId=S2_L2A_CDAS&fromTime=2025-05-02T00%3A00%3A00.000Z&toTime=2025-05-02T23%3A59%3A59.999Z&layerId=6-SWIR&demSource3D=%22MAPZEN%22&cloudCoverage=30&dateMode=SINGLE

June announcement? No visible flare.

I realized BS was referring to SS1H’s total depth. Confused me. I thought he was saying we have 2 mile horizontal. Def gas in the ground.

Oleo do you know the well he references? Just trying to understand what his assertion is based on. I don’t recall a two mile lateral that produced so well.

Hard rock, maybe I missed something. BS talks about a two mile lateral that produced similar to Marcelas?? Did I miss that?

April 17, 2025.

https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu/?zoom=17&lat=-16.80542&lng=133.64347&themeId=DEFAULT-THEME&visualizationUrl=U2FsdGVkX1%2BMI8UCgesuPZltFvLYGpJLDr5KSbPHoz%2FIrrtr6MPW%2BK8bRXd%2Bxg4Okcgmv65y3WeRcleaibXQA4sxBLoYpB8OOw45IGP85FcGtiX8mziy309WJvNWhJ0t&datasetId=S2_L2A_CDAS&fromTime=2025-04-17T00%3A00%3A00.000Z&toTime=2025-04-17T23%3A59%3A59.999Z&layerId=6-SWIR&demSource3D=%22MAPZEN%22&cloudCoverage=30&dateMode=SINGLE

Unfortunately, I don’t see a flare. Unlikely to get an update at the quarterly CC.

Frackme, that is corect. I guess my point was Riddle said a short soak (just a few days), get a 30 day, and then shut in for 6 months to see how that improved flow rates. Obviously, that is not what happened. My guess is they decided maybe to address the other well and figured no harm in a longer soaking period based on prior experience. We shall see. Or Wet is correct and its a weather related delay. Either way they should update shareholder.

Wet, I meant six months. Riddle talked about this in his last interview. Short initial soak and then they would shut in both wells for six months (maybe longer) while they get the next wells done. He talked about being able to use the data to possibly have longer soaking periods in the future if the increase was worth it.

I agree. Frustrating they don’t say something. My guess is they cleaned it up and are waiting to address the other well. I am guessing they think a longer soak period is only going to be helpful. Riddle said short soak period on these two and then they would shut in for six months and then see how that improved the flow rate. Guess things have changed….though concerning they just can’t update the market on the change in plans. Looks like Wet might be correct about May. GLTA.

Why does it not show up on SWIR like all our other wells? I get you see a little orange spot. But none of the other filters recognize it as heat. Like I said, it's been the same going back to Feb. But initially we had confirmation via the SWIR filter of a flare (back in Feb). Why would it not show up now on SWIR? I don't think you can confirm that is a flare.

You mean like his one?

https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu/?zoom=17&lat=-16.80424&lng=133.64388&themeId=DEFAULT-THEME&visualizationUrl=U2FsdGVkX19D463mHSaBu2SH5RjDSjgG%2FRPK0LAUN%2BDeHlwohL2dtlp%2FOBBCSaVwXdYVzL%2BFXfO5hyERddypnr9t9Uz80HITEpzeE6ulPAvd19tKyH1Qc5GAhuPV7GHb&datasetId=S2_L2A_CDAS&fromTime=2025-03-13T00%3A00%3A00.000Z&toTime=2025-03-13T23%3A59%3A59.999Z&layerId=1_TRUE_COLOR&demSource3D=%22MAPZEN%22&cloudCoverage=30&dateMode=SINGLE

Not sure I agree. Does not show up on SWIR which has been traditionally the only way to see it. Or, it's the smallest flare we have seen to date.

Here is 2/21/25. Same image.

https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu/?zoom=17&lat=-16.80424&lng=133.64388&themeId=DEFAULT-THEME&visualizationUrl=U2FsdGVkX1%2FeP%2B0vVm9TluuZPQi%2FwJ7dcvlyzNwfvsxxlsaQFpFHMidpxNXgjrIZfehntwlI02Xm2LcgijUdiT1Tl6m8YN55Qyh%2FfebfcL3KDnLNyyPk%2BnPJIkjDULLo&datasetId=S2_L2A_CDAS&fromTime=2025-02-21T00%3A00%3A00.000Z&toTime=2025-02-21T23%3A59%3A59.999Z&layerId=1_TRUE_COLOR&demSource3D=%22MAPZEN%22&cloudCoverage=30&dateMode=SINGLE

Go to March 3, 2025. You’re saying that is a flare too? Keep going back day by day….should have had a 30 day by now. Not sure that is a flare.