bottom_feeder6 Jun 2019 10:14
bottom_feeder. Seeing as I am on a train with time to kill, I shall engage. Please refer to my previous thread entitled "Children".
At that time, it was ScoutS who took issue with almost everybody else on this board. His proclamations sounded a lot like yours, including allegations of someone/people running multiple lse accounts. In the spirit of my thread title (Children), maybe the old adage "He who smelt it, dealt it", might be appropriate?
Seeing as you, also, accuse me of being many people, here are some earlier comments of mine which the odd not very worldly observer might find comforting (thread title "Children"):
1.
"Ridiculous at the moment, this board.
I sold out at 80% loss to take a chance. Am trying to build it back up again elsewhere with some success and hope I can time a buy back in at sub 1p. We shall see. Worth a crack.
I don't know why any holder would post such childish and bitter drivel about and around their stock, no matter how bad the ride has been. Why not at least sell half and see if you can build it up again somewhere else, if you are so convinced you are being stuffed on this one."
(Incidentally this is exactly what I did. I am back in now with my modest original holding, having lived a happy life invested elsewhere instead if trolling a bulletin board like a miserable little person.)
Then;
"I should add: I'm not just aiming at those ultra negative holders. "Children" applies to everyone who is regularly posting here currently. You all need to sort yourselves out. "
Then;
"SCoutS;
Why so sensitive? My posts were aimed equally at Nagy. I made that very clear: " "Children" applies to everyone who is regularly posting here currently." "
bottom_feeder, you seem to think that the majority of people are naive and easily led. I'm not sure what your life experience is, but I can tell you this is not the case. Almost anyone seeking to learn something from reading a board like this, before getting into a stock, will read back some distance. Almost anyone will be able to clearly read through your seemingly delusional (or downright nasty) stories. I don't know why you bother, so persistent. You accuse others of being paid. ...."Stooges". One only has to take a view of who is most opinionated, most prolific and most abusive, to decide who is most likely not a true player.
Don't steal my tagline. I say "have a nice day" because I believe in positive energy, being good to people. You say it to be sarcastic. Which I might add, is the lowest form of wit. Have a sarcastic :-) from me.