Member Info for 15LIVES

It's okay Loads

I sold my PHE when I was 400% up.

Hi Slappy

It was reported last year that Buffet sold half of his holding in Apple (his largest investment), taking a loss of $5.7bn after the stock fell 7%.

Warren Buffet also says to sell a stock when it falls 7% to 8% below what you paid for it.

Why do investors always cherry pick quotes and advice from the great man?

He is referred to on many bulletin boards, yet the bottom line is he would never invest in hardly any (if not all) of the companies whose bulletin boards he is mentioned.

Hi Red

It was an unknown trade that went through of 4.5m.

The assumption is that it was a sell based on the price of 0.88p I think it was.

It was a delayed publication trade, so wasn't necessarily executed yesterday. Hence, your confusion as to 3.3m shares traded.

Delayed publication can be undertaken for various reasons, one of which is to help avoid volatile share movements caused by large shareholders buying or selling.

Castle

Even below 5%, he still has to report when he sells a further 3% of his shares.

Under AIM rules of reporting changes in holdings of voting rights stock, shareholders are required to fill out a TR1 form if their personal share holding changes by 3% between notifiable percentages. This includes below the 5% threshold.

Therefore, a holder of stock below 5% still has to report when they have disposed of 3% of their shares.

Hi Divvyup

Interesting article, but the premise of it (set out in the first paragraph) is that building a carbon capture infrastructure allows the burning of fossil fuels to be carbon neutral. This goes against various organisations' statements that carbon capture is not carbon neutral:

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)

Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA).

This getting to carbon neutral and all the varying technologies and viewpoints can be a minefield.

Dusty

I wasn't having a go.

I saw it as typo.

We've all done it.

By Huayin. Not buy Huayin.

Unless of course you want to.

Filterland

Approximately 3% to 5% end of use tyres are treated globally via pyrolysis.

The steel wire makes up 15% of end product and is reused in other applications.

Fuel oil makes up 45%

Carbon black makes up 30%

Syngas makes up 10%

Above percentages are provided buy Huayin International who have been treating end of use tyres via pyrolysis for thirty years.

Hope this helps.

As an aside, a ten pound Powerhouse share price equates to 40Bn Mcap, not 400Bn.

I don't know about me and Red sharing a tent, more likely Castle sharing a room with his brother.

Castle

You haven't caught me out at all.

It's called referring to yourself in the third person to make a point.

A style of writing I should have known your ignorance in all things grammatical would fail to grasp.

It's called sarcasm, Castle.

Talking of multiple accounts, haven't heard from paule79 or paule64 for a while.

I didn't slip up at all, Castle.

I purposely posted it like that.

Castle

I do have good words to say about Powerhouse and where Emmitt has got them to now. However, unlike you, I keep it real and haven't sold myself a fantasy which you clearly have. You've sold yourself a dream in which you firmly believe there isn't even the potential for delays, setbacks or even failure. You've invested that much money, time and emotion here that if there was an RNS released stating there had been a catastrophic failure of the kiln during hot testing you would see it as another opportunity to average down.

ITM went as high as they did a few years ago and fell back because of the very hydrogen bubble I was telling you about.

That's why back in 2020 I was laughed off the ITM bulletin board when I predicted they would drop back below 50p when they were several pounds.

They are now in a much better place.

I'm here because of the reason I've stated a million times when rampers like you constantly ask the question to posters like me who refuse to agree with your blind, unwavering belief that things can only go right: Powerhouse have potential and are worth keeping an eye on with the view to investing should things go well with testing and other things fall into place.

Jeez!

How many times do I have to say that before it sinks into your thick skull?

Powerhouse have nothing at the moment. It's all in the testing stage.

Instead of giving wild, stupid, baseless predictions and comparisons with companies like NCYT you instead back up your share price forecasts with extrapolated earnings and units needed to be sold to get to your lofty, fantasy driven predictions?

Castle

You must be joking thinking PHE are in a better situation than ITM.

ITM have products in production and being sold.

They have a purpose built 1GW factory.

They have contracts with Shell and a partnership with Linde.

More FID expected soon from Shell for 500MW of sales.

ITM have over two hundred million pounds in the bank.

Powerhouse don't even have a product to sell yet, no orders and are quickly running out of money.

Powerhouse are now where ITM were twenty years ago.

No disrespect, Loadsadough, but I don't need to look at the PHE charts from five, three, one or however many years ago.

And I'm certainly not interested in your stages.

I didn't ask why Castle kept promoting Powerhouse technology per se. I asked why he kept promoting the self sufficient part of the technology - as if it's a USP, when in fact it's industry standard.

I have to disagree with you there, Castle.

My memory is one of Howard White first saying fill your boots after the share price had fallen a long way from 12p.

You may be able to give a better timeline of when he first stated to buy, and what the share price was when he did, but my memory of events doesn't aline with yours.

I'm open to persuasion on when he said his now duplicitous quote.

Regardless, you can't ignore there was a hydrogen bubble at the time. It's well documented.

I'm still at a loss as to why you keep promoting Powerhouse technology as being self sufficient. Yes it is, but so are other manufacturers systems. Powerhouse patent is nothing to do with being self sufficient.

Patxaran

When this went up to 10p a few years ago it was on the back of a general hydrogen bubble. Any stock related to hydrogen at the time was pulled up regardless of fundamentals.

Basing where this share price can rise to should now be based on those fundamentals, for the bubble burst a long time ago.

The high Powerhouse share price at the time, based on nothing but crazy speculation in the hydrogen sector generally, is still seen by some as a yardstick as to where this share price can and should be now.

Whatever the price it now goes to, the bursting of the hydrogen bubble shall make sure only fundamentals now dictates its rise or fall.

Hi Red

I did suggest months back that it may be worth approaching Greenpeace, or mentioning to Powerhouse for them to do so.

I can't see them changing their stance on Pyrolysis being just another form of incineration and " mutton dressed as lamb", but it's at least worth a go and trying to start a conversation with them.

Unfortunately, this is the harsh reality of what this technology is up against, whether Powerhouse's or other manufacturers.

If someone was to ask the environment minister whether the government's new incineration policy differentiated between incineration and pyrolysis my guess is it would be met with a look of confusion and ignorance as to what pyrolysis even was.

From the environmentalists point of view it's binary: does the process, whatever it is and regardless of the amount, produce CO2?

And that's what they make their decision and stance upon.

This is a challenge, yet a great opportunity for Powerhouse. But it's no good them waiting for the technology to speak for itself - if indeed they are.