Member Info for 13thmonkey

DW total own a lot of forecourts, so do I have it the wrong way or not, be consistent in your opinion. That image from total is exactly what I was describing, but no doubt now that you have found it it's a wonderful idea.

Chippy, unless they own H2 production and conversion to e.

DW you really are a rude FC, the problem with car manufacturers creating networks is the poor level of standardisation. It's amps and volts, that's all. There are providers who will be feeling the constraint of the grid well before them.

So in the interview AFC were 'approached by' but by whom? Car manufacturers are not in that game, they'll comply to a standard range of charging ports. Garage forecourts and service stations on the other hand could be interested. Imagine the cost (if it's even possible) of getting a couple of MW into a service area on the M5, they may be currently maxed out, but need more, one thing that they do know how to do however is transport and store flammable liquids, they do that day-in day-out, so going to a fuel cell supplier seems reasonable.

They also have land that oftentimes no-one cares much about from a planning point of view, pop a few turbines on and they could partially refuel themselves.

It's also a step towards supplying h2 at the forecourt.

Some interesting phrases in the video, and confirmation that Southern is not dead, merely resting.

Is moving h2 around the country (like petrol) easier than getting MW connections into service stations half way down a motorway in the middle of nowhere (I think yes it is) . The electric use would be mostly at a time of peak demand in general, decoupling the demand from the production would be beneficial from a grid balancing standpoint.

Wish it were pushed out rather than just placed where people have to find it, ah well it'll show in the results.

I assume this is recent? Although it shows in neither reg news or other general news?

Not trying to stop you posting, just pointing out that what you are posting is one sided, and takes the tinyiest hint of weakness and deramps accordingly. You have freedom to say what you want, and we have the freedom to think you are a bit of a knob because of it. One day you'll be right. As I said, if you believe what you are saying put some money behind it, else you are just an angry little man.

As a whole your posts, especially the bump 4p post, were all suggesting it was going to drop, you might be right, fire enough off of those and you will be. I can only assume from your actions that you have a grudge, it's an inference based on your behaviours, the same as your inferences based on the stock behaviours.

I guess you got burnt early doors, sorry to understand that, but at this price it is far more realistic, sorry if you can't accept that, don't know when it will improve but my thoughts are that it has a good chance of doing so, some do, some don't.

I didn't realise that you were talking about me making stuff about you, and not the company, as the company is the point of the discussion. So lets start with what you've said, I'll work backwards:
Tue 13:15
"Bump. Just gone sub 4p again . "
After a rise and then a bit of a dip, you know the way that shares do after a rise, no real need to comment about it, but comment you did.
Tue 13:14
"You can;t ignore what has gone on before though. Placing after placing, diluting down holders. A friendly tipster giving this an occasional filip but even his predictions of 6 and 8p have proved erroneous. Their laughable outlook statements. They claim to be in a sweet spot but report lower revenue than expected. Their on-boarding of new snouts in the trough which increase costs of course. The SP shows occasional signs of life but I will point out yet again that talks of 6p and 8p have in the past proved fanciful. I don't have a problem with positive opinions here though I get all sorts of abuse for being a contrarian here. But I will remain here to defend my position as I believe this is going nowhere."
All very negative based on no actual information apart from years old information
Tue 12:02
"Maybe this will pay off but this company is a meal ticket for the BOD for sure but whether there are any crumbs to be ahd for investors is another matter."
All very negative based on no information
Tue 11:38
"13Th I would short this to high heaven if I could, on the back of this rise certainly. Speculative. Without substance and too far too soon."
Negative, suggesting that the rise is too soon, again based on no information
Tue 11:33
"Only one trade at 4.25p so far today with most of the trades around 4p in the last half hour. Unless there is renewed buying this is going back sub 4p. No real substance to this rise but rather speculative positioning on the back of the placing. It might be wise for those who do not know the history of FLX to note every single placing here has lost money"
Negative, suggesting the rise is too soon, based on no information on the company as it currently stands.
Mon 15:59
"Well it has just got 8.45% cheaper today and the ones who were asking where I was on the rise have disappeared. The placing excitement has rapidly gone it seems at least for now."
Shares fluctuate, a day later it rose, almost like you are trying to sell the story that it will fail based on no information (it might fail, I'll grant you that, but lets base that on evidence)
Mon 08:33
"What proper business needs placing after placing? So companies float publicly to do placings? iIs that really what you are saying?
Dilutative placings always in the case of FLX. The SP has gone from 54p to under 3.5p today in my time here. If you think this is a proper business Mr D I suggest you think again."
Again challenging a fairly std practise to raise funds, at this point in time they have a purpose, II's with more information than you brought in, where's your point.

Fk1 I'll give you a chance edit your posts before I start quoting when I'm on a desktop and not a phone, it's going to take a while to quote them all.

Can you quote what I have made up please? I've offered opinions and justifications for my opinions, I've stated nothing that is 'made up'.

I'm expecting more posts from fk1 soon as there have been £10k of sales over 4 deals. Which is nothing. Now, it may turn into something, it may not, but if someone claims the sky is falling in every single time someone sells, eventually they might be right. There is no news today, this is neither a good or bad thing, it's just that they're is no news today. Likewise suggesting there may be more posts may or may not stop more posts.

Omg, they've dropped a little! Things must have been cancelled, the world has changed! That was sarcasm by the way. Someone has taken a little profit probably.

Sorry cap not call, obviously.

At 54p the market call was immense based on not a lot, the current market call of 7M is, in my opinion, quite reasonable for the current age potential level of sales, had the dilution pushed the cap up to 20 plus million I'd be concerned, but right now it's OK. Once potential sales become reality then that kind of mcap can be reached.

I did notice the scale, and kind of shrugged and thought there was nothing to be done about it now.

These are all soft phevs so they only get 30 miles on electric if you are lucky, so you get home, you've got fuel in the tank, which someone else pays for, do you get out and plug in, or get in the house? If you've not got an external socket handy the choice is obvious, if you have an external socket with that range the choice is obvious.