Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
There does not appear to be much positive here at all, and by the looks of the responses I wonder if Blue is actually Tony Crawley, he seems to know allot that does not appear on the google machine.
Oh wait, I just found a patent from 2017 that looks pretty much like, or exactly the same as this Haven thing ? Another Tony Crawley and belongs to Firescape Global, nothing in the that says Zenova.
This is like untangling christmas lights from the year before.
I am really confused now who owns what, who is the inventor of what..... does sound like this is gonna be a big IP figh, assuming any of them own anything valuable.
When do the half year results come out?
Wait a second. This is a wind-up, isn't it, original? It must be because otherwise, that would have to be the most clueless self-own in the history of financial chat board responses. Good one!
Blue - my questions are precisely open ended for that reason, allowing the formulation of any answer, rather than a selection from a set of possible answers, as per the definition of opens ended. As for rhetorical, I suppose they could be viewed that way, as they do imply a particular statement from my part, but that doesn’t mean they can’t or shouldn’t be answered. As you seem to have taken a positive view of ZED and mine is no longer so, could you find the time to research the questions I have posed and post your views rather than me posting my findings on these points? As these were my main concerns that persuaded me to sell my holding, it would be a good balance of opinion to read any positive views on those particular points. If you can’t find anything then let me know in here and I’ll perhaps post a link to help steer you in the right direction, but it’ll probably be on Monday as I doubt I’ll check in again until then
OHS
Wait, 'Original'. Are you Q?
Well, let's see, 'Original'......um.....no. No I don't. For the record though, I also don't happen to know what Tony Crawley was doing the day JFK was shot, or why some people think the moon landing was faked, or that Hillary Clinton runs a child trafficking ring out of the basement of a pizza restaurant. Instead of asking me open-ended, rhetorical questions dripping with innuendo - but (shock!) containing precious little real information - allow me to paraphrase a previous comment of mine: Got a point?
Blue - If you read further back you will see that I was quite a supporter of Zenova and the 'potential' that some of the RNSs lead me to believe in. My research, if you have read back, probably far surpasses yours and it is for that reason that I am no longer invested in ZED. I am well aware of The Haven product and that it is/was a powder suppression system - are you aware of who the designer is? Have you researched all the significant share holders listed in the IPO document and found any similarities? Have you researched the current patents pending for the extinguisher and the ceiling suppression system? Have you checked when they were submitted and when they are expected to be released? Have you researched the Australian company and the personnel detailed in the IPO for that aspect? Have you found any details of that contract? Any sales?....... I wonder if you'll find all that on Google?
First off, the last few days have been among the most difficult for UK small cap companies share prices in living memory, so excuse me bd if I didn't respond to your angry gobbledygook right away, but I have a life and don't have unlimited time to explain Zenova's merits to the likes of you. Any delay in responding to your nonsense is just a delay and conveys nothing whatever about the level of credibility of your claims. If anything, its quite the opposite. For now, suffice to say that nothing you wrote is accurate, and most simply doesn't make sense. Zenova have no claims against it having been vetted throroughly in the IPO process, and has had its product claims reinforced by a series of contract, distribution and 'favoured supplier' wins across major institutions and geographies (which YOU conveniently ignore every single time you cough up another fur ball) that have set it up for significant revenues in its maiden year as a public company, as I have written about in detail multiple times now. None of that applies even remotely, to Firescape/Lifesafe. Not only does that 2-headed creature have no such clarity on certification status, but limited product offerings, no prospect for moving beyond retail platforms and are likely to see disputes on its/their iP rather than ever making claims on other companies. As a result, I believe the IPO of either company must necessarily be in doubt, which is precisely why you have suddenly appeared here engaging in some kind of last minute, desperate (paid?) projection. As Alaric wrote, I think we will all stay with the mother ship, thank you very much. And finally, Original - give us all just a tiny bit of a break, would you? The company bd has asked you to mention produces a metal cylinder containing a powder, which is problematic since powder can't be deployed in every market. But overall, what's your point? Has anyone here claimed ZED can't or doesn't have any competitors anywhere? Take bd and head back to the google machine to do more 'research' and spare us any more of this amateur hour at the trolling factory stuff.
Alaric - are you including The Haven as one of these 'small companies' trying to gain exposure?
From what I can see firescape original inventor is part of Zenova and this would have been explored in the flotation DD . I would stick with mother ship and ignore these other small companies trying to gain exposure off the back of zenova
BD - Have a look into a product called The Haven https://havenfiresafety.com/
Yes have done research, hence the questions which some appear to ignore and happy to put their money in with eyes closed, I have also read some of your previous posts, you are right - where are the revenues from these RNS's and great news and big contracts?????
Whilst my questions have not been answered, silence from the rampers is golden and speaks volumes.
Not sure what you mean "interesting connections" regards the products, one of the points I was making is about the products and certs / SDS etc. and there is nothing I can see, can you point me more in the right direction is these connections please as I presume there is more than just Tony Crawley.
BD - have you researched the Zenova CS product? You may find some interesting connections there
I have tried to ask some questions here, but just appears to be ramping - bluerill states "he knew" fire escape, and now on research I believe he means "Firescape Global", a company with the same technology, like the same by the looks of it and looking up the patents and companies house as a reference of the said Firescape the inventor is one "Tony Crawley" like the same CEO of Zenova???
Now Mr Crawley is the CEO of Zenova, surely he knew their secret formula and has brought it here in a bid to make money, hoodwink, deceive or has he got a whole brand new tech?
What is happening here, can someone explain to me please
Thank you