Firering Strategic Minerals: From explorer to producer. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Lord knows what goes on in the Baker household in the wee small hours.
Minature horses, toads, confusing codes.
Still at it at 5 this morning.
Those were the days !
Wish I could remember them !
Billy, lmfao
Good luck with that request!
Do you want to explain what you are talking about? in plain, easy to understand english ! Then i can correct you on whatever misconception you are under ! would that be ok with you ? . .
For the market to value Bushranger at 0p..
not very harsh …. extremely harsh ..
Imho & dyor
>> what are you on about ?
Another way of letting you know that Ma has been sitting on her Ass all afternoon!
Lmao, what are you on about ?
I hate to say it but I think we've had the sweetener today....................
i think, in bird speak, it means:
'feck, i've dug myself a huge hole bs'ing the market with my tier-1 world class asset ****e' - 'i need some time to figure out how the feck i'm gong to get out of this.....'
BS baffles brain.
Soz almost forgot the question………A raffle.
Good one gord, I was going to put the updated conceptual feasibility study but my failed state education won’t stretch to being able to accurately decipher this paragraph from the RNS.
>>The continuing economic study by independent consultants Optimal Mining will model the impact of TOMRA pre-concentration on the overall economics of the Project, while we also consider other pre-concentration routes for Bushranger ore and we look forward to releasing an updated economic model for the Bushranger Project."
Upon reading it half a dozen times! I’ve decided it comes into the wishy washy category of decisiveness in the typical vein of xtract reporting that leaves you scratching your head wondering wtf it actually means. But in the back of your head, you have a feeling it means they will wait until further potential pre concentration routes have been explored and then tested, so those results too can be incorporated into the ‘continuing economic study’ along with further test work results on more high grade samples ‘before’, releasing the updated model and study to the market.
What say someone with letters and 5hit after their name? 😉😆
Just for fun , anybody with any thoughts with regards to a pre agm rns sweetener ? I'm going with first income from kukuyu :)
They could stockpile the spoil until the mine is exhausted, hopefully by then the price of copper will have risen sufficiently to make it economical to run the tailings.
Not XTR of course.
Lmao, very good mr jezzo !. I've had a quick scan through the TOMRA australia website and it does mention re-running rejected ore for scavenging and finer sorting , every little counts !
It's the ore CB rejects that make's XTR the best.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=it%27s+the+fish+that+john+west+rejects#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:28bbc7e5,vid:AZ_RoeZxhrU
It crossed my mind that there is a possibility the rejected ore from sorting could lend itself to bioleaching , thoughts ?
I would take 5p now tbh
Ooooooo 10p defo
I'd be happy with half that Jezz
You are correct Howezap, if it's smaller but economical it has a value and once the AA hurdle is crossed it could be a nice little bolt on for a larger operator nearby with an infrastructure already in place.
Just get it sold CB.
10p please
What needs to be remembered is that all xtract need to do is show there there is a reasonable business case that an aquirer can be confident the project can be progressed further. If it comes from a far smaller operation that doesn’t exploit all of the Cu inventory but is shown to have a better economic outcome as pre -concentration will ultimately offset a degree of those recovery losses with reduced Capital outlay and Operational costs which will have a positive counter effect on NPV.
What was it that you used to preach Steve4077? It’s not about the grades, but what can be economically recovered. It’s basically the same ball park.
How xtract achieve that in the ‘most’ attractive production scenario to show the project is desirable is what is important.