We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I think a grand in here now will make it 10 later on in short term
Just hav to wait and see
I should have written:
"Will be positive simply to have the uncertainty of the GM behind us" ... assuming the votes are there in favour of all the resolutions (the 2 special resolutions require 75%).
NibblePibbley
I wasn't decided last time. What's to say it will be decided this time?
Why else would they do this then - just for the hell of it !!!
Get some reality
Who said it would be decided?
The future of UKOG is about to be decided.
Roll the dice Sanderson
Will be positive simply to have the uncertainty of the GM behind us.
I guess the other one is pboo.
Shows that ocelot's reading list is a who's who of Adrian's accounts, Adrian's 'mates' (except when he disagrees with them) and the pump brigade when they arrive.
Must be so overjoyed to know that the company's prospects are so fantastic vs what has happened. For ocelot it's always day one of UKOG's revival because from today there's the chance that HH, Turkey and Loxley aren't as bad as the wells already drilled have demonstrated.
In proper oil companies the results of previous drilling would be taken as a good indication of what might happen with the next well - as ably demonstrated by all the Basur wells before Basur-3 as demonstrated by HH-2z where presumably UKOG were well aware of the fracturing a d water issue before it was drilled as they had an injector planned, and for the future Loxley-1 with Alfold close by.
But UKOG preferred in Turkey to use the Kurdish fields as an analogy and did 't mention the fracturing in the Portland before HH-2z except once in 2016 - and fracturing a edium to carry water to production wells.
Poor ocelot, soon he will only be able to read his own posts, then he will probably be happy…
Ocelot
You obviously don't like mine then. We all know you read them and all the others you have on "filter".
I am now left with 4 messages I can read amongst 20 on the page, 3 of which are my own.
Makes you wonder why ocelot is not letting everyone know what "£1,476.75, or should Resolution 1, 2 and 4 not pass up to the maximum aggregate nominal value of £1,476,746.31" means.
It just means UKOG can release another 14.6bn or 1.46bn shares to pay off the £0.66m owed to YA before the AGM when they can apply to do it all again.
And still the mugs are pumping this HOS for their own personal gain at the expense of others. No shame whatsoever.
Penguins
He sold those at a loss and bought back in on Friday. Can't remember which name he was using then. He has also deleted the tweets about his last 2 "buys". Take everything he says with a pinch of salt and I don't use salt.
That’s him rightfully gone, he’s banned but can’t accept it
Ibug,
There were 2 buys that totalled 2 trading fees less than £5000 on 21 February, which actually averaged about 0.00745p per share. Whoever bought them, and there were no names beside the buys so no one knows anything apart from the value, now has 66,867,287 shares they might be able to sell today for 0.0061p each or a total of £4078 less trading fees.
So if that was cornishman there's about 1000 reasons to desperately post on here insulting anyone he doesn't agree with.
I like everyone else have assumed the EBT shares will sway the vote in the Bob's favour. What happens if it doesn't - another postponement while UKOG put forward resolutions that help current 'genuine holders' rather than the plunging then spiking regime traders like resulting from massively over promising and then massively underdelivering.
Maybe get a CPR done on HH so those genuine holders can understand the issues and what is really likely !and that would help holders of PPP to understand if the farm in is really worth it) Maybe even get another CPR done on Loxley without interference from UKOG (and correct the glaring errors and look at the Alfold well logs).
Stop spending ever ore difficult cash on the Portland Port project - they're going to have to reduce their equity eventually in UKEn - do it now.
....and stop fantasising about Turkey and pay the penalty we were told was ten of thousands and exit Resan - a licence they shouldn't have claimed was potentially transformational or that fields in Kurdistan were analogous to Basur with the poorly performing E Sadak field, next door in the same reservoir.
But they won't they'll keep promising unicorns and finding donkeys.
I've no idea what the 4 green messages following my own said but, on the assumption they were not entirely complimentary, "thank you" admin.
Please would someone clarify a
"Genuine Holder"
Nearest I can get to is
someone with their head in the clouds
Ocelot
Have you really not worked out what the "£1,476.75, or should Resolution 1, 2 and 4 not pass up to the maximum aggregate nominal value of £1,476,746.31" is worth.
You really are not as bright as you make out. Teachers Pet is losing it.
It doesn't matter how hard you try to polish a tvrd, it will ALWAYS be a tvrd !!
Those who want to sell really should have sold by now.
The results of the GM should be known this afternoon.
Then it's a question of what UKOG does re the approximately £660k remaining due to RiverFort/YA:
"Conversion of these Equity Shares by the Investors now reduces the balance of the GBP2 million gross first cash sum received to approximately GBP0.66 million" (RNS of 23/01).
Strange. There were no large buys at 0.0074 last week. Easy to check.
https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareTrades.html?shareprice=UKOG&share=Uk-Oil--Gas&trade-date=2024-03-01
Adrian
Won't be long before it is worth £4k then will it?
Adrian
Re-rating yes. It is certainly going to go down. Another 50% shares in issue this week and another 50%+ shares on top of that in issue next week should do the trick.
Adrian
This is what Horndean does for UKOG.
"net share of production revenues of £287,000, with net earnings after operating costs of £136,000."
Hardly worth mentioning is it.
Adrian
All the figures get reported every month. It is not my fault you are unable to read or comprehend them.
Ibug
Posted in: UKOG
Posts: 9,453
Price: 0.0075
No Opinion
RE: HH December 231 Mar 2024 07:39
Reporting Period Month Name December 45 bopd
Oil Production Mass (tonnes) 188.658
m3 233
Associated gas production mass (tonnes) 6.755
Associated Gas Production Volume (ksm3) 7.59
Gas Flared - Volume (Ksm3) 7.59
Gas Flared - Non Hydrocarbon (%) 4.5
Water production volume (ksm3) 168
Reporting Period Month Name November 44 bopd
Oil Production Mass (tonnes) 176.814
m3 209
Associated gas production mass (tonnes) 6.124
Associated Gas Production Volume (ksm3) 6.881
Gas Flared - Volume (Ksm3) 6.881
Gas Flared - Non Hydrocarbon (%) 4.5
Water production volume (ksm3) 185
Reporting Period Month Name October 45 bopd
Oil Production Mass (tonnes) 187.812
m3 222
Associated gas production mass (tonnes) 7.309
Associated Gas Production Volume (ksm3) 8.212
Gas Flared - Volume (Ksm3) 8.212
Gas Flared - Non Hydrocarbon (%) 4.5
Water production volume (ksm3) 202
Reporting Period Month Name September 48 bopd
Oil Production Mass (tonnes) 195.426
m3 231
Associated gas production mass (tonnes) 6.93
Associated Gas Production Volume (ksm3) 7.787
Gas Flared - Volume (Ksm3) 7.787
Gas Flared - Non Hydrocarbon (%) 4.5
Water production volume (ksm3) 186