London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Ste is upset because a small amount of volume has gone through and it's homing in on yesterday's closing price.
It might take a while for him to cool off before he/she/it responds.
Come on @Ste2k/GTC/APH, whilst it’s quiet this morning, you were very quick to comment on no volume this morning. What about the rule changes, index buying? What’s that going to do to volume in a couple of months time? What do you think? Who’s going to sell their shares, not the 65%, so what’s going to happens IYO? Can’t wait to hear
You’re wasting your time mate. He’s a weirdo that blurts out nonsense and goes back into hiding. Probably disgruntled because he’s traded it poorly.
Probably right @citypie. I am interested in the counter argument though, as on the face of it looks very positive for buy volumes in THG and other standard listed shares with a market cap that gets them into an index. Does anyone have access to an electronic version of all standard listed shares & their market caps? Looking on the LSE website but can't seem to find it.
He’s not trading it @citypie he’s a well known Paid deramper for the Short & distort gang.. Word on the street he works for Marshall Wace or another big firm to spread FAKE news about companies particularly THG… GLA LTH
LOL....you are joking right?
Last post from Dr Lao suggesting Ste2k might possibly be paid by Marshall Wace got quickly deleted. See how long these stay up 😂
If that is the case Anacott then what a sad existence. Imagine that being your job! What a twat
It's complete BS. He will be laughing into his spread bet seeing that people has turned him into a hedge fund boogie man.
Really is Twilight Zone stuff
70p a bridge too far
Once 70p is broken we can go on a run. You ready to cover Ste?
"Once 70p is broken we can go on a run. You ready to cover Ste?"
Talking to yourself again "steveinHell", I do like it when you get your different accounts to talk to each other
On a side note I saw that you had about 10 posts yesterday saying you were the victim of cyber bulling, go to admit made me laugh and gave me a chuckle most of the day....but and there is always a but...
even though your a shorter .......when the share price goes up this is not cyber bullying...lol
@Lordeh don’t think steveinhull is a shorter, just a frustrated shareholder. It’s only Ste2k/APH/GTC/polishcap that are the same person I think
Ah my stalker is back again.
Noted @ Ste2k that you’ve not offered a view on what LSE rule changes mean for THG buying volumes in H2 due to index trackers. We’re all keen to hear?
@yesimaneliver
Yeah he is , he goes through these "trying to rehabilitate himself" phases but he has been around a long time and if you check back he doesnt own any shares and has said so lots of times. Once he even said he was showing all the negatives to Protect people from buying them
He is just an obsessive that has convinced himself I am connected with STE2000 so creates multiple accounts to try to convince others of it. It started years ago with a dimwit called SP28 who used to create entire threads in an effort to get us connected.
Doesn't seem to be able to work out that if I had any interest at all in creating another nickname I wouldn't actually make it similar to another one would I.
Solid rejection of 70....AGAIN
I have only one account, unlike you how many you got now?
Unfortunately for you trying to call out others for what you do won`t work, you have absolutely no credibility
Then stop being obsessed. Just move on. It isn't healthy for you to have a fixation on people like that. One read of your posting history tells all.
Also reveals who was behind that "Steveisdull" nick name a few days ago
Maybe take a break for a while.
You could fill a venue with all the user names he has created over the years.
Anyone with half a brain only needs to read the posting history to suss him out. Always the same spellings and uses of capitals on his pet terms. He isn't very bright.
Feel free to list them, it will help others green boxing.
@crafyinvestor
you’re completely missing the point. it’s nothing to do with my valuation i’m not bidding for thg. it’s how any potential bidder will value thg and it isn’t using revenue or ebitda multiples.
any large investor looking to bid for thg will build out cashflow projections over time to determine how much free cash will be generated. this will ultimately determine what anyone is prepared to pay because the free cashflow effectively relates to what they can expect as roi.
they will get an m&a team at an investment bank to do this on their behalf and provide price guidance based on this.
other factors will apply to determining the final price but this will depend on the individual bidders including things like funding costs etc.
i’ve said this before - stop misrepresenting things i say and stop try to confuse the issue with waffle. i quite like reading some of your posts but in this instance you are repeatedly talking **** and you must know you are.
Also CraftyInvestor - why do you keep on deliberately misspelling usernames for anyone that doesn’t agree with your view of the world. How old are you 12?
Speciman, you have digs at me and others, it was your Iceland lunatic asylum post that made me bite. In life, if you dish it out you have to learn to take it and no I am not 12 :)
In the past, I have sold one of my businesses, I have completed the complicated Information Memorandum, and I know how it works.
In January you said:
-----
Revenue multiplier isn’t a realistic way of valuing a company irrespective of what Kelso say.
I suspect they know this, but they are fishing around for support so valuing Nutrition at £3bn+ fits right in with their narrative even if it is disingenuous and nowhere near reality.
You also said:
Just my opinion but I would have to agree with GoCPI on this, EBITDA multiple valuations are a more standard way of valuing a company than Revenue multiples.
-----
This is your opinion and IMHO it devalues your investment, I am of the opinion that a Revenue Multiplier is the correct way to value THG Nutrition and that it is worth £3 billion or x5. I have posted many examples of other comps in the Nutrition and Beauty sectors with bottom-line multiple revenue valuations, so I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this one.
Thankfully when MM talks about valuations he talks about multiples of revenue and not multiples of EBITDA, so I am happy about that.