Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Put the holding shares up for sale to the highest Bidder, imo
That will get the ball rolling again,
Roxi …. Yep we are clearly for sale but there is a massive disconnect between our current share price and what kind of offer would fly ….. like 1984 my money is on the Chinese so is Willem’s, Warren’s & plenty of others ….. roll on 2024
Sounds like Newcrest may be open to offers of a sale of their interests, don't think they would accept anything less than what they paid for them though.
we could be in the January Sales window??? bargain of the century
So based on the below info, Newmont should be sitting on fence or abstaining as they won't have formed a judgement just yet so voting against would be odd. On that basis Scott and co are safe as houses.
From the article....
Newmont CEO Tom Palmer said he had not yet decided whether his company would retain the 10.31 per cent stake in SolGold inherited through Newcrest, nor how Newmont would cast its votes.
“In terms of the listed Newcrest things on the plate, SolGold is down, down the list quite a bit in terms of where we are focusing our energy,” he said. “It is too early for us to be forming a judgment just yet.”
Should be a short court case! How’s he going to prove that he’s not a f——— moron given his performance at the helm and what he did?
Https://www.afr.com/companies/mining/sacked-ceo-sues-solgold-for-breach-of-contract-20231212-p5equr
No worries, nal. You make a fool of yourself every time you post, so one more is neither here nor there.
8
For me
Fort, is a colonel in the BHP army…….
Fort ….. I agree they need to deliver and I believe they will.
Both the share price and the news flow should be much more positive come the start of 2024.
“I expect the share price to be back into the teens in January is the recent suppression is down to tax selling and sellers dry up”
Also agree with that ….. 🤔
Fort, I pretty much agree with all of your 8:20 post, although I'm not sure the Special will pass - it all depends on what Newmont do. And I too hope they've got the message about needing to deliver shareholder value asap. If they don't, they won't have jobs this time next year.
Eloro. Thanks for concern. That's queensland. Mate. About a 6 hour flight away.
Of course your right adikt, my apologies. Senior moment.
But you've once again proved my point. Nobody filters anybody.
Stop making a fool of yourself, like I just did
Might be.
I’m not convinced that anything said on these boards has ever influenced a share price. Suppose it could just add to the dialogue in main stream press and does no harm for the likes of BHP who want us for the lowest price possible. Big money brings dirty tricks.
Not fussed if we pizz of BHP it’s only the colour of their money I’m interested in.
I might be wrong, but my spidy sense is telling that my Buddy NAL is a Chinese poster:)
NAL, I am seeing on the news here in the UK that you guys are having flooding and that there are Crocs in the flood water on the streets!! Scary. I hope that children will be kept safe in that environment.
Hi, Thank you for all your posts. At least you discuss Solgold and we can agree and disagree along the the way.
This NAL I thought at the beginning way unwell and felt sorry for them but as time has gone on they are either paid (unlikely) or just like making trouble. He is the only one currently on filter so now just poke it with a stick for a bit of fun. It passes the time until action here.
I’ll have to get a tee shirt printed with a galah on it when this company finally gets sold.
Have a great Christmas
My Xmas break starts tomorrow. Hence, I am looking forward to the outcome of the agm with eager anticipation:)
I do hope that NM survives come what may.
Aquinaga, I think I had a screen of about 7 greenlines on the trot yesterday so looks like they have been reduced to talking with their own multi aliases... poor old LSE... their advertising rev muct be dropping these days.
Nal, I couldn't resist unfiltering you for this one.
You appear to believe you're invested in an Australian company. Sorry to disappoint, but the directors are employed by a UK registered plc and are subject to the UK Companies Act. It may also help if you read our Articles, which are also governed by UK law. Section 19 will tell you what you need to know.
Hope this helps.
Oh god two more green box galahs just popped up. There’s a whole flock of them!!
Over here we have green ring necked parakeet. They are an invasive species and classed as vermin. Not dissimilar to the great green box galah here.
The parakeets are pretty but my goodness they make racket!!! Oh the similarities!!
Furthermore COWN. Read the second line.
"Name and type of company
Decision-making and board member selection structure
Nature and extent of liabilities of company members
Details of company shareholders
Business objectives and activities of the company
Rules and regulations pertaining to share issuance, board resolutions and director duties"
DECISION MAKING AND BOARD MEMBER SELECTION STRUCTURE.
If newmont do abstain, then Scott should fly through as CGP and Mather et al have plenty of votes to see him clear against BHP and a few others.
I'd like to know if the 5%+ SOLG/CGP shares carry votes and if they do who's responsible for casting those and on who's authority??
I would expect most resolutions to make it through as well ... but remuneration might be a close one.
The CGP boys simply have too much ownership overall now compared to last year. Which probably explains why the arrogantly strolled into this AGM delivering zero and expecting to breeze through.
I expect the share price to be back into the teens in January is the recent suppression is down to tax selling and sellers dry up.
But I think the last few months has been a wake up call for Scott and Bob. I think they've heard the voice of shareholders now and know that a loss of confidence vote can be raised on them at anytime shareholders choose via special meeting. So they need to deliver and deliver fast as thus far it's been woeful and they know it.
Aquinaga. Still reading my posts. Have you no pride.
No inaccuracies in my post. Read it clown.
The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) requires that each company must choose to use their own Constitution or adopt replaceable rules from the Corporations Act 2001(Cth) or use a combination of both. Therefore, before you register your company, you must either draft a Constitution or seek to adopt the replaceable rules.
Addicknt,
I think the default for players like Newcrest/Newmont is to vote against the minnows. We know that's BHP's stance. Some big ego's in the aussie and canadian mining patch so bit of that involved too.
Newmont have said that SOLG are way down their list of priorities which in mining language could mean we are the most important thing to them right now lol! So for them to vote against SOLG would imho show their hand a bit. It would suggest that they are in the game and running and send a signal to BHP. So you'd hope they play it cool and do the honourable thing and just abstain.
I presume more inaccurate 💩 from the galah this morning. Green boxes everywhere!
Must be worried Christmas is coming and he’s been a very naughty boy!
Great green box galah, tastes like chicken just a whole lot more bitter and twisted, Merry Christmas one and all!
Addikt so authorative, so sure everything you post is fact.
Regarding the appointment of a new board.
I wonder if you could cut and paste for us all to see.
"The company constitution rules."
Companies in Australia mostly have these for just such an occasion.