Listen to our latest Investing Matters Podcast episode 'Uncovering opportunities with investment trusts' with The AIC's Richard Stone here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Pretty stunning results from Blanca-Nieves.
But unfortunately irrelevant, we all know what is in the ground, what we do about it is the issue.
Killjoy, it adds to the overall picture and I'd rather have this than nothing.
What we could with is an announcement similar to that of this morning's from Condor.
Killjoy by name and killjoy by nature...
Filtered
Is this all part of the lowball defence we have discussed at length over the years? Solgold 'recently' drilled these holes. When?
And once again we hear from our NED Nick Mather. Where is Caldwell? I find this baffling and highly unusual.
Anyway exciting results. Let's see what the market makes of them.
SM, I think it's more likely to be aimed at bolstering Caldwell's position in advance of the AGM.
I take it as an honour to be filtered by Redknight
Nice to see some actual news!
But why now? Butter up shareholders?
How much of this work really is recent?
About ten years ago Solgold did this before an agm. Amazing exploration RNSs every day for 8 or 9 days . Did anything happen, no not even moving the share price up.
So why now and what’s their plan.
It feels like we are showing a bit of leg again.
Are we put out on show all our projects to show what we would still hold if part of the portfolio was sold?
Sorry for all the questions, but after all these years we are all still guessing.
Hope it’s different this time.
Looks like they are aiming for a bootstrapping deal…much like a number of years back!
Add if that was the intention you'd think he'd put his name to the RNS. Mather as NED lending his voice to this news is bizarre and makes me think that this work happened a while ago but only tested in labs recently (latter half of 2023, according to the RNS). You can see the high mineralisation with your eyes.
This might be a final roll of the dice for Nick to get the payout he and DGR have wanted for so long. It's either desperate stuff or part of a playback that's finally come off the shelf. We shall see.
Playbook*
"SM, I think it's more likely to be aimed at bolstering Caldwell's position in advance of the AGM."
Addicknt, uoi couldn't be more wrong. Look who's name is all over it. Rememeber it is Scott who mothballed the exploration. It's Scott who has prevented this news from hitting the wires. Just imagine where we could be now had we explored it over the last year!!
This spanks of 'life' after Scott. Thank goodness, SOLG are seeing the light and realising that the market needs to see SOLG exploring again.
Vote for Mather, vote Scott down and we'll be back on track again after this woeful 12 months under the inept CGP boys.
SM, yes, it is unusual, but there may be a perfectly innocent explanation. Who knows?
Caldwell has known for some time that he's facing opposition, so isn't it more likely that this has been planned? Whatever the answer I just hope he isn't on his way out. Fort &Co seem determined to destroy our chances of getting a decent exit.
Fort that is utter dross and shame on the 3 people who upvoted it too. Mather is supportive of Caldwell. You continue to ignore this fact.
SharketMare,
Mather is an exploration man through and through. It's what he believes in most. So I'm afraid... while he has to say he is supportive of Scott (if he didn't then it wouldn't send good message to market would it) he most certainly is not supportive of someone that stops shareholders seeing the exploration fruits born out of the extensive folio.
Scott is the reason why you have been starved of anything remotely exciting in terms of news. Wake up!
Fort, how do you know that? Has he told you?
@addicknt you spend your life on this bb (12k comments on Solg) and ask this kind of questions? seriously?
Not many comments about the AMAZING!!!! gold and silver results? anyone like to put a valuation on those?
Magoo, what's the answer then? Someone who makes a claim suggesting he knows what a director is thinking deserves to be challenged. Or are you naive enough simply to accept it as gospel?
I personally think that's a good call Aquinaga...
We are an exploration company. So were Cornerstone.
Sell Cascabel/Tandayama for a song...special dividend to shareholders...invest in exploring the other 90plus projects...rinse and repeat
Fort, Scott is CEO of the company and his name is on the RNS. It wouldn't be published without his say so and certainly not with his name on it. You are talking b*llocks yet again.
To repeat what DBW said...even if Scott gets voted off the Board he could still stay as CEO...wasted votes...
SM, indeed. It actually states that the announcement has been approved by Caldwell.
Isn't it the case that NM is the director responsible for exploration? Therefore it makes perfect sense for him to add his comments.
Of course he can't stay as a CEO. What an absurd idea. So shareholders vote him down as a director and the company then think it's a good idea to keep him as CEO?? I think some of you need to remember who owns the company? It's not the CGP boys, it's ALL shareholders. And if or when Scott loses the director vote, that's a unaminous vote on his inability as CEO.
Some of you on here are living in another world.
No CEO continues in his or her post after being booted from the board. End of!
Now, lets get Mather back in and get back to exploring again as those rock chips are very exciting. We've barely scratched the surface. Don't listen to Scott and co... ... we are not doing any exploration... who does he think he is!!?? We are an exploration company... so move along Scott and let us shareholders get on with proving up our amazing folio while your mate Bob tries to muster the power to rediscover his swing timing on ENSA
How many more RNS , before the AGM, they seem to be plucking them out of thin air at the moment?
Added a few more , on the back of the amazing gold results