London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I tried to tease out explanations of his posts last night ...
and i have not dismissed his view .. please show a post that does that ...
you need to Commit your shares to Michael .. how many do you have ??
you can be first on the list
i do not need to do anything. you are not the custodian of this bb.
so you are not supportive of ...
""""The aim of my post was to see to what extent other investors had similar thoughts about issues related to the overall management style in order to bring them up at the AGM in a concerted way. """"
ATB
RR, thank you for that list. To me, a good comms / marketing manager could handle and field items like that.
For me, I'm still trying to figure out how I find out how much has been raised through the emergency appeal... The research programmes seem to go far beyond the creation of a vaccine.
ATB
Ruck,
I think Chester gave you the perfect answer last Friday, turn the record over please.......
Sorry to chirp in on your conversation but I am intrigued by the comment about being 'entitled '.
When we buy shares in Scancell or any company ( other than a placing ) we are buying on the secondary market. Those shares can float through our fingers either making a profit or a loss.
If we hold shares on a particular date when we can vote most of us don't or we just pass to a proxy. Holding shares gives us no special privileges or demands on the company.
We are attached for the ride and that's all.
It's our belief in what the future has in stall that means we either continue to hold / buy more or we sell up.
Chester.
Bunsie,
Trouble is, every time I turn the record over I find you on the B side.
Ruck, more like the "P" side = positive!
ATB
Ruck,
I fancy another "top-up" today so perhaps I should encourage you to carry on, I may even get some at 3p!
ATB
Well it seems like someone has struck a chord with some and hit a nerve with others.
I think an important point has been raised concerning the conflict between academia/science and commerce/finance.
Running a company and making it financially successful requires management, discipline, adherence to regulations and focus.
The environment you need to be a good research scientist is the opposite. You need to be given free reign, think laterally and not be constrained by rules.
This is no ones fault, it is just the way it is. It does need recognising and managing though.
Bunsie,
At 3p I might be tempted myself!
commerce only exists if you have something to bring to the table ...
the drivel that comes out of some posters is astonishing ............
the Regulations that scancell has to adhere to on the academic side dwarf any red tape that the commercial side has to contend with
Inanaco,
I partly understand your irritation. Who are you by the way? As far as I can tell, you spend hours on this bb, almost on a daily basis, to pose as an "expert". Are you that territorial? It's only a bb.
On one hand, it's great that you show such interest in my posts. On the other hand, you tend to spin other people's posts or even tell outright lies, frankly (the false "quote" re professor Durrant for example). That's not on and it says a lot about you. If in (genuine) doubt and you are misunderstanding what one is saying, try to re-read their posts in full context.
As for your claimed scientific knowledge, you remind me of what a teacher used to tell us at school: " in certain matters, half-baked knowledge is worse than no knowledge". Half-baked would be generous in your case as far as I can tell from the answers you gave the other day since you forced the point - unless you are unable to articulate scientific concepts. Also, you don't know my background. If you ever come to the next AGM, you might find out.
Try to calm down. There is a life outside this bb :-)
these are your words not mine
"""""But I stick to the point that management and the Board should also put on a business hat from time to time in addition to acting like academics.""""
"""A few questions:
- what does DC stand for?
- if the approaches are similar, where do SCLP's competitive advantages lie (if any)? As importantly, are such competitive advantages protected by patents?
- got a bit lost with Inanaco's 16:07 post ... broadly speaking, is the idea to get the virus stuck on the surface of a cell and not let it go inside the cell to destroy it?
- oh, and are the HLA phenotypes the places on the cells where the virus binds to something? """"
if you feel you have a better grasp of the science, then maybe folks should divert technical questions to you ...
ATB
of to watch the Cricket ...
PS ... nobody appears to want to lend you shares ...
enjoy the cricket. try not to attempt to take over the batting!
Inanaco,
Blimey, I really hope for you that Scancell will develop a vaccine about attention seeking eventually!
As I said, there's is life outside this bb.
My posts are not about seeking attention ... what they do is thwart attention seekers ... kettle black
you have no evidence in your history that supports any science based discussion in which you lead
not seen any evidence of you understanding Insider trading rules and how it applies at AGM in what Directors can say
i see no evidence of you understanding NDA agreements which are put in place when signing collaboration agreements
I could go on .. as covers are on ... but getting a bit tedious ..
if the cap fits!!!!!
Inan is forthright but posts a lot of useful stuff.
The forecast for the cricket is rain all day so possibly expect to be Inan'd
Some might say it is easy to post 'useful stuff' if you are blessed with the superpower of mind reading.
Inan,
Your 11:11 is a classic example of your “if I can’t understand it, it must be wrong” attitude.
Obviously you have never run an R&D team.
won a smart award £50,000 .. from Gov ...
What was it for Inanaco ?
stabilisation of camera's fitted to a Jet turbine Helicopter with a 30kg lift capacity ... using inertial guidance and GPS the for runner to the drones u see now .
i also designed and manufactured the Heli ...
it started as a twin 2 stroke .. then jet .. then we went electric .. using 2 x 3.5 hp neo motors .. fit in your hand .. 48v lipo via 3 phase inverters