We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Here's a translation Part 1:
Inviting Avishai Ovadia for a discussion with Gideon. Tadmor, the founder and head of Jets Tadmor, who was in management under the management of Delek Group during the discovery of gas at Tamar. He established Nevita which purchased drilling rights worldwide and enhanced them, this is reflected in significant value creation. The stock has risen by 2.5 times year-over-year to a value of 4 billion shekels. Where do we go from here? Hello, how are you? Thanks for coming, I'm glad you’re all settling into the chairs here, it seems to me, Tzachi, that’s you, Gideon. I want to start with a question to the audience. A theoretical question: You invested in a stock that rose by 150%—do you think the chance of staying with it is high or low, and in your opinion, high? Good, you know what I’m aiming for but the natural choice, let’s call it that, of investors after a stock rises 150% to 200% is to cash out, and rightly so it usually means there are usually drops after rises, right? If the value has already increased then why keep holding? There are other things I'm saying this without necessarily giving advice or stating anything, but I’m saying it in continuation to the fact that last night I read the reports of Nevitas. Ah, and about a year or a year and a half ago we followed them and saw very significant potential especially in one of the largest drilling projects we of course, we write what we believe in, it has risen since and I told myself last night for sure it’s nearing its peak but I keep reading, and not just reading, there are very significant tables that speak of very significant saturations. Okay, I will do it very roughly take the expected profit if and when the partnership reaches the end of the drilling in what’s called Shennanduah. Shennanduah, I keep getting it a little wrong I'm dyslexic, I understand you’re promoting now you’re encouraging, ah so it’s not a drilling it’s a project and it needs explaining because it’s very important it’s part of our strategy we’re not looking for oil we develop and produce and therefore it’s not theoretical the challenge is to develop which is the non-binary challenge it’s about finding but the challenge to develop is much less challenging in that sense if you take financing for it maybe one of the arbitrage situations known to them the ability actually to go to the Israeli capital market and bring from it both equity and especially debt for the development of projects that have already been discovered that’s what we know how to do by the way it’s a strategy I think is unique in the world in this upstream sector so these numbers actually represent the NPV.
Citizen,
Turn the subtitles on by pressing the CC button. Then press the "cog " ( settings) button and you should have an option to click subtitles and then auto translate. Click the desired language and the subtitles will appear. Its a bit flakey for me so I had to continue to refresh the translation by refreshing the CC button.
Hope that helps
Mogger
'Hullbist
Posted in: RKH
Posts: 75
Price: 15.76
No Opinion
getting out whilst i still got enough for decent holiday bye25 Nov 2019 21:01
well done you have all finally broke me new to this really but i cant take any more 27k down the drain over approx 6 years cant wait no longer
good luck anyone who stays in'
How do you get the subtitles to be in English?
MD, It's reassuring to know your privy to Navitas's finance package for SL 👍
Mogger, Finance isn't an issue....Regards
All,
Unless you want to practice your Hebrew, I suggest turning on the subtitles. Not much information about Sea Lion but at the end you will hear how confident he is regarding the financing of future projects.
Mogger
https://youtu.be/7iiFlzqWoxQ?si=OSUo5nzgq5TsT9Qs
**I have been here over 10 years, today i finally sold my 15773 shares at a loss of £3K**
Unbelievable!!
The strangest of timing to sell after 10 years of holding I have to say. We are closer now to the prize than we ever were, another year and we could all be millionaires Rodney.
GLA
Well that knocks Equinox off the list of farm-in partners and probably Valaris off the list also! Plus the basin they are drilling is approx 800km to 1000km to the north of Sea Lion, it's unlikely they are in communication!!!!
;-)
But then we wouldn't need a drillship anyway, it would be overkill for the pretty simple development drilling we need, 35days to 45days per well.
Saying that, I am sure I read/heard somewhere what a drillship, although expensive on the day rate, did have some cost savings over a semisubmersible. Basically because it can move around under it's own steam, thus not needing the support vessels a semisubmersible would.
It would also be advantageous if Navitas wanted to take a share in Darwin and wanted to nip down there and do a couple of appraisals during down time! It might also suit having a higher spec'd rig to drill Isobel as from memory it was higher pressure.
I suppose it depends on how the numbers stack up, a drill ship tootling across for South Africa rather than a semi being brought from further away, with tugs, moving at a much slower pace; a drillship being able to manoeuvre itself and drill faster and then head off after 11 wells, (or 14 if you could one on Isoble and a couple on Darwin).
Probably just me daydreaming again, but stranger things have happened at sea!
LTT
I have been here over 10 years, today i finally sold my 15773 shares at a loss of £3K its been interesting reading over the years and name changes etc have humoured me
i wish you all the best of luck but im finally bored
good luck all
Valaris D17 Drillship is moving down towards Falklands offshore Argentina arriving tomorrow to start drilling. Targeting 1 billion barrels.
Equinor in April will begin drilling the Argerich-1 exploration well in the CAN 100 block in the North Argentinian basin, offshore Argentina.
The well will be drilled 315 km from the port of Mar del Plata by the Valaris DS-17 drillship in 1,527 m water depth. It will be the first to be drilled in the country in ultra-deep waters. The well is expected to reach about 2,500 m in depth and 106 cm in diameter at the sediment surface. Drilling work is estimated to take 55-65 days.
If the presence of oil is confirmed, Equinor and partners are expected to carry out an appraisal campaign in 2025 to gather technical data including field size and potential productivity.
The Argerich project is operated by Equinor with 35% interest. Partners are YPF (35%) and Shell plc (30%).
The article refers to an agreement from 2016, which was then " torn-up " by the Argies in 2023 - no new news.
R1234,
It doesn’t say much of anything except that he has been rehired to head up a different organisation based in Geneva, Switzerland.
Nothing about relaxing Argentina’s stance on the Falklands I’m afraid.
LTT
Does this mean that those assisting in FI hydrocarbons will no longer face sanctions? I suspect the threat of sanctions was what made Harbour Energy pull out.
It’s a good sign, but a little misleading as the ambassador has been brought on to do a new roll, nothing to do with the Falklands. They are just rehashing the controversy surrounding the previous deal that was torn up.
LTT
Very good news!
“In a positive spirit, both sides agreed to set up a dialogue to improve cooperation on South Atlantic issues of mutual interest. Both governments agreed that the formula on sovereignty in paragraph 2 of the Joint Statement of 19 October 1989 applies to this Joint Communique and to its consequences. In this context it was agreed to take the appropriate measures to remove all obstacles limiting the economic growth and sustainable development of the Falkland Islands, including in trade, fishing, shipping and hydrocarbons. Both parties emphasised the benefits of cooperation and positive engagement for all concerned.
"Macri administration wanted improved political, trade, culture relations with UK and Point 10 referred to the South Atlantic and the Falkland Islands, which made the Kirchnerites furious and were prepared to ignore it, particularly mentions of helping promote and develop the Islands economy."
https://en.mercopress.com/2024/04/22/milei-reinstates-ambassador-foradori-who-signed-the-falklands-2016-joint-communique
Surely the agreement to settle any tax due later (IF of course there is any) included Rkh trading normally in the meantime and was all TO ENABLE Sea Lion to happen. FIG need to keep to that agreement, not renege on Rkh trading normally in the meantime, and accept clarification of the wording to reflect the "meeting of minds" at the time of the agreement. That meeting of minds IS the contract that's actually in place. It presumably could be one interpretation of the existing wording. Simply needs clarification. All, as before, to enable SL including Rkh funding its equity share.
That's my tuppence worth for now!
After the farm out to Premier, there were a few wells drilled. Did RKH use some of the carry or did they pay their share completely themselves ?
Rkh no longer owe FIG any tax as the tax was owed on the free carry that they never received.
So it's zero tax owed on a free carry of zero !
The free carry went in 2021 when the new deal was struck with Navitas but FIG have not yet accepted the ammendment.
Its difficult to understand why FIG still haven't accepted this seemingly simple amnendment after 3 years as it seems relatively clear cut,being,No Free Carry = No Free Carry Tax.Simples !
RKH can't afford to pay FIG anything until Sealion is in production regardless of the OM payment. You can't have a situation where we pay a tax we don't even owe only to find Sealion doesn't get approval and RKH go bust due to lack if cash.
BlooBird, both equally good. It's as good an explanation as we can get get to from the information we have. Just need FIG to stop hindering their own O & G industry !
SpaceHoppa
It looks like we were both typing at the same time ... but you explained it slightly better than I did.
I'm probably wrong but this is how I see the situation.
I seem to remember that, after Premier walked away, the £64 million CGT was negotiated down to about £32 million ... to be paid after first oil.
RKH are negotiating with a 3rd party who want to purchase the OM claim but the 3rd party are worried that if/when ROI pay the money over to RKH then FIG will try and grab a prior claim to some of the money.
Buzz, this is how I understand it.
Rock has agreed with funder that funder has the right to pursue ROI for award amount and that Rock will transfer to funder the agreed % that they recover from ROI.
FIG though have a claim to Rock assets, so if ROI pay up the award money to Rock, FIG in theory then have a claim on that money and in theory could stop Rock paying funder their %.
FIG I think, just need to agree not to do that.