Adrian Hargrave, CEO of SEEEN, explains how the new funds will accelerate customer growth Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Thanks Digitalboy1 for sharing SM's reply, and CitizenTS 08:38 post.
I personally feel FIG are total Pen1sHeads if they prioritise the ludicrous idea that Rock owe FIG £59.6 million from a 'irrecoverable carry of approximately US$ 670 million' that Rock did not receive from Premier.
Financially blackmailing Rock, if that is what they are doing, over Rocks monetising the OM award, instead of helping Rock to create their O&G industry, which Sea Lion alone will benefit them with $6Billion, is moronic at best !!
It's good to know why FIG now have a say in the OM award, however it leaves me with the impression FIG are way out of their depth, petty and incredibly short sighted.
As PaulDrayton says, it’s a clever situation which benefits both RKH and FIG.
This “deemed Capital Gains Tax” from 2012 was valid at the time, but everyone knows that it is no longer payable including FIG. It has been written down to zero in the Company’ s accounts and the auditors approved that. The liability no longer exists under status quo. But there is a useful clause in the tax deed where it becomes immediately payable if the Company were to be taken over. It’s a poison pill to prevent a takeover and anyone in the know, knows it, so it’s useful to keep it.
When Odey tried to grab the cash element of the Premier farmout in 2013, via a court action to convert the share premium to distributable reserves, FIG used the CGT liability to take a security over “all” of the Company’s assets to prevent that happening. Odey was thwarted and left with his tail between his legs. That security is now the apparent clash with the OM award funder, as the potential cash assets increase.
It is a clash that can easily be resolved through a legal agreement for the ranking of securities, viz. who gets what first, if it all goes belly up. Banking consortia do this every day.
Maybe that’s why Sam is going to meet FIG next week?
I think the poison pill will remain even after the clash is resolved.
“London Calling” …..remember The Clash?
I wonder what will happen in the unlikely event that the Annulment procedure reached it's end already next week and RKH is awarded everything. Will that mean that the cash deal will be renegotiated in such a way that RKH gets more out of it?
As I said, FIG will look after FIG and they are unsurprisingly playing hardball with rkh as, for them, its Navitas,not Rkh developing & funding Sea Lion, rkh are pretty much just being carried, So whilst FIG be eagerly licking Nav ass, they certainly ain't gonna do the Rock any favours.
Sam & the team will have to use all the guile,diplomacy & negotiation skills they can to resolve these issues and hopefully get FIG to authorise the OM transaction & agree the tax ammendment.
We don't want another arbitration and I expect they will iron things out between them. Rkhs case on the €674mln carry they never received is stonewall but I suspect FIG may be seeking tax on the $231mln carry that rkh did receive but that's speculation on my part and may or may not be the case.
Navitas may even lean on FIG if they continue being uncooperative & stubborn as they will want things to keep moving and the OM cash will be needed to go towards rkh's share of the funding, so FIG, whilst seemingly holding all power over rkh, do not hold all the cards. Navitas do and Rkh being their partner, Nav will not want to see FIG holding back Rkh and thus, potentially holding back SL development, so thankfully we have a powerful allie in Navitas on the matter !
Hopefully Sam will return from his trip to the FIs with FIGs approval 🤞
JEBR, I do not believe the monetisation award is up for negotiation until after the deadline that FIG have to approve.
If the award is upheld in full, the specialist funder stand to gain $150m or more.
If the appeal is upheld, they stand to lose $45m.
The chances favour the former significantly more than the latter.
Regarding the comment: “ suspect FIG may be seeking tax on the $231mln carry that rkh did receive but that's speculation on my part and may or may not be the case.”
You may be aware, but RKH paid tax on that portion many years ago. I’ve followed this company for years and years, so cannot recall the exact document that info is contained in, but I can assure you that tax has already been fully paid.
That's Great Rpoodle, thanks for posting 👍
Rpoodle, the voice of reason.. Good to have you posting again Sir!
Seven years and counting on May 19th:
https://icsid.worldbank.org/cases/case-database/case-detail?CaseNo=ARB/17/14
And still we sit at:
'April 11, 2024 - April 12, 2024
The ad hoc Committee holds a hearing on annulment in Madrid.'
These guys have Phd level qualifications in delaying tactics.