Scancell founder says the company is ready to commercialise novel medicines to counteract cancer. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
BTC back on its way up now....
That’s all well and good Suthy.. but without a positive update from the professor.. we’re not going anywhere I’m afraid.. This is dragging on now. I mean how long does it take to test?
Come on FG ffs what’s happening chap..
'I mean how long does it take to test'
They contacted the CGMiner dev a couple of weeks after they said they were live testing using Method B as an extension of CGMiner. Presumably they hit issues and needed the help of a core dev.
BrewLaLa, reported for spreading malicious misinformation, owns no shares here but set up an ID to continually troll with.
Report this persistent troll to admin!
Just saw bitcoin hit nearly $70k? Now would be a great time for some Bitcoin news. Do you reckon an update is due on this like usual?
'BrewLaLa, reported for spreading malicious misinformation'
All factual Jambone. You can't handle facts.
The reality is no commercial product has yet to be available. The court settlement with strings will prolong testing window but we still need a product. No one denies if method B works we are all quids in, but without even a shred of tangible proof this is revenue generating many of us remain skeptical. Why can’t people accept our apathy on news outside of proof of concept??? Many quotes of Fg said this Fg said that but he isn’t the messiah and more like a politician so what’s there to believe. Think what shareholder value has he actually delivered post halving and several years down with many rns stating they can produce this and that and the next rns is £££££ ??? Cynical of London but happy to be proved wrong with facts not words…l
Rubbish, facts my a rse, just imagine if someone posted QBT had cleared a load of BTC solo mining, you would be jumping up and down saying it was made up, yet a trolling agenda with zero proof is fact 🤡
How many share ms do you own here again brew, zero
, zilch, none……says it all.
Why do you choose to infest this board with negativity when you sold out?
What’s with the many of us remain skeptical Clerk?
Who is the many?
QBT has shown solid movement forwards, not at the speed we would all like as wanted to be a millionaire last year and not this.
Been live testing for a while now to prove up method B as we all want, tick tick.
Jam one, judging by the 7 or so tick ups my post received that means some fellow board readers are also suffering apathy but can’t be bothered to post. The reality is there are probably 5/6 key positive posters and 5/6 key negative posters with the majority of us sitting on the fence with fingers crossed but also aware there hasn’t really been anything positive. I admire your positivity but if you look at this exercise from a purely commercial perspective of implementing new software that will bring efficiencies, the amount of hurdles, about turns new ways to install etc most other companies in question would have given up. It just seems that every update is not the promised revenue stream we keep getting told about and so there is only so long we can believe in the product as there isn’t proof of concept available. Of course the miners will show interest as it isn’t costing them anything similarly if I claimed I could turn lead into gold in principle people would be interested initially in case it was true but demand evidence ultimately. Keep up the positivity but we also need a dose of reality here based on the last 2 years substantial updates which haven’t delivered a revenue generating product which is ultimately what they need to do.
Clerc, pmsl, you do realise we have a troll bot here ticking up any negative posts with gusto, so I wouldn’t go on any of those tick ups meaning anything.
Clerk, next news is method B works, that’s what FG said at the end of the last media update.
Of corse there have been hurdles along the way or it would have been done already, that’s the beauty, nobody else is doing this.
Next News method B works which FG said when it was relayed to us they are testing on 2 large mining pools intensively 24/7, FG knows way more than we do so….
Careful Clerc, you used the phrase 'lead into gold' as I did so we'll probably be accused of being the same poster.
Otherwise a measured post that I agree with though you put it more mildly than I do - but no doubt you'll still be labelled a troll if you haven't been already (all I can see is seven green boxes so far this morning apart from your post).
As you say it all comes down to delivering a revenue producing product. They may well be getting closer to this every day as some insist. Either that or it will never come at all.
In the meantime everybody's patience has a limit and some are already well past theirs whilst clearly others still have plenty in the tank. Time will tell whether patience has been a virtue in this case but meanwhile the sp will continue to stagnate without hard news of definite progress towards that revenue goal.
'nobody else is doing this'
Braiins do it. Luxor do it. All rig manufacturers have optimisations built into their rigs. Only difference being they have working products while QBT are still stuck in the development phase. No point in promising 2.6x speed increases if you cannot get a working product to market.
No they don’t do what QBT are doing BrewLaLa, why do you need to mislead again?
Well over a thousand trolling post on QBT which was the reason you set this account up.
The magical tick your own posts up within seconds, how does that work Brew? Are there magically a lot of negative posters ready to tick yours and any other negative posts up?
Why have the troll accounts gone into overdrive since the 4x500k sells yesterday, coincidental or you need to get your trade to stick?
As for working product to market, do you not read all the RNS and thats exactly where all QBT efforts are now!
Obviously doesn’t suit your non invested agenda, maybe start posting on your actual investment GST, because with all the ramping going on there it just will not move.
'No they don’t do what QBT are doing BrewLaLa'
Yes they do. They provide optimised Bitcoin mining software/hardware. Exactly the same as QBT would do if they ever manage to get a working product.
'As for working product to market, do you not read all the RNS and thats exactly where all QBT efforts are now'
As I said, the firms I mentioned have working products, QBT do not and cannot put a time frame on when they will have one (as mentioned in the PRN).
I mean if your naming companies that are already doing what qbt want to do, why do you think qbt can't achive it and also do it better ?
That's a good question. QBT claim their approach is different in that they are attempting to exploit a supposed flaw in the way sha-256 works. FG claims nobody else has tried this, although he is wrong as it's what ASICBoost achieved and we saw how the Bitcoin community moved to counter the advantage by changing the BTC transaction format (search for SegWit if you're interested).
No reason to believe if, and it's a big if, they get this working it's advantage will be negated by another change in the way BTC is mining in order to protect Bitcoin decentralisation.
In the meantime we are expected to believe that companies that live and breath optimisation and BTC, with massive budgets, have not tried to do what QBT are doing. With the added benefit in that these firms could keep their optimisation inhouse and so negate the need for a SaaS.
Brewhaha
Occam's razor is a principle of theory construction or evaluation according to which, other things equal, explanations that posit fewer entities, or fewer kinds of entities, are to be preferred to explanations that posit more.
Some of these guys really do need a shave!
I've seen this scenario before, they will keep believing and the Suthy's of this world will keep on spinning the fairytale.
So there we go BrewLaLa, you do know QBT’s approach is different yet you try to say others are doing the same, the only likeness is they want to improve efficiency, QBT are the only ones with their approach so stop trying to mislead AGAIN!
That’s a fair point Drutor. I agree in general with Brew that others are doing (and succeeding in doing) what QBT are trying to do but also with you that this means that QBT should be capable of achieving the same. This to me though only applies to method A where others are already delivering the same kind of benefits that QBT are promising. Even if QBT do succeed here though I can’t see companies rushing to do deals for the sort of modest gains already being achieved by companies with their own solutions or available from others.
Method B is different as nobody is achieving anything like the huge benefits that QBT are claiming so in that sense nobody is doing this. It’s the sheer mind-blowing nature of these claims though that make many sceptical that they can deliver - along with the lack of any evidence of success so far and that nobody else seems to be aiming nearly so high (as far as we know).
As for the vague and mysterious method C who knows? I’m not sure even QBT are clear in what they are trying to achieve.
If that’s your thoughts Hexam, why are you here? Same as the other trolls, find a different investment, thousands out there, all about keeping the SP down for news day isn’t it boys, will make sure everyone knows about QBT on the it works RNs to make it as difficult as possible for you to buy, it will be just deserts!
" If that’s your thoughts Hexam, why are you here?"
Good luck with that. They never answer that question :)