Adam Davidson, CEO of Trident Royalties, discusses offtake milestones and catalysts to boost FY24. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Yep sorry missed one days purchase in share tally not in cash. The cost will be higher than your figure once stamp and commission added so i think £1.297m is minimum spent so far . ..which equates to 20.66p per share.
Still might prove to have been rather generous when the company was paying over 23p in the market..around the time sales to cover director taxes were made.
Date Shares Ave Price Spent
11/04/2024 270,000 0.21200 £57,240.00
12/04/2024 70,000 0.21770 £15,239.00
15/04/2024 60,000 0.22800 £13,680.00
16/04/2024 426,439 0.23322 £99,454.10
17/04/2024 760,868 0.22757 £173,150.73
18/04/2024 468,639 0.21125 £98,999.99
19/04/2024 497,162 0.19913 £98,999.87
22/04/2024 490,137 0.20198 £98,999.83
23/04/2024 492,214 0.20113 £98,999.99
24/04/2024 496,427 0.19943 £98,999.95
25/04/2024 497,737 0.19890 £98,999.89
29/04/2024 253,783 0.19308 £48,999.91
30/04/2024 261,213 0.18950 £49,499.86
01/05/2024 257,812 0.19200 £49,499.90
02/05/2024 192,441 0.18930 £36,429.47
03/05/2024 258,447 0.19153 £49,499.84
07/05/2024 262,599 0.18850 £49,499.91
08/05/2024 262,510 0.18856 £49,499.94
Hi Kooba, I've been tracking this and as of yesterday I have:
£1,285,692,19 spent
6,278,428 shares acquired
£.20478 average price
So not as generous (which is good) and the average price is reducing as the price drifts down.
For anyone interested i think before today they have bought just over 6m share back for just under £1.3m for an average 21.23p…
They have reduced their purchase amount but still account for most of the buying on any given day..close to 50% ..but they seem to be drifting even with that support. It makes sense the company buys back as low as possible and not give an exit higher than necessary to those who want out. With an average 21.23p they already look to have been rather generous.
Nanonano you are posting on a thread called buy back print asking whether commenting on the share buyback prints is relevant.
In the absence of anything else not trolled over endlessly its about all there is to discuss…the fact we have no knowledge of what product its in or what end user /market there may be has been somewhat covered already.
If anyone has anything that throws any light on the detail of the promised commercial build up then please post.
@bachatanut. agree - endless possibilities for fpv drones and missiles with potential to instal relatively cheap sensors with performance close to that of indium gallium ****nide. i would like to know if nano is exploring those markets but if they are, would they let us know?
My understanding is that the product referred to by Nanoco is the chip now being marketed by STmicro. Producers of products for consumers now have to decide whether to use those chips. That is bound to take a little time and typically would first be used in high end, low volume products before reaching the mass market. Nigel Picketts, after years of not selling, took the recent opportunity to sell at 24p so I am not expecting any exciting announcements in the short term. Once the £3m share buyback programme is finished buyers may be in short supply. And there will always be holders who need, or decide, to sell.
Maybe LordWM knows something - bet he's adding more chunks ATM !
Does it matter?
Surely what's more important is the size of the market the company is operating in and where the tech is being used. Currently, we don't know either.
Well looks like the broker messed up the buy back print put it in at the wrong price then reversed it which has boosted the volume…should have just cancelled the trade and printed again…now it looks like painting the tape to make it look like there was more volume!
First paragraph should have said-
Until Nanoco can offer more information on the products its materials are being used in, or secure orders that can bring the company to a point of break-even (at minimum), I don't see this share breaking out beyond its present position.
Until Nanoco can offer more information on the products its materials are being used in, or secure orders that can bring the company to a point of break-even (at minimum).
They've been in a similar position ten years ago, with plenty of cash and lucrative contracts just on the horizon. The difference is that now they're pitching for the sensor market and they have sold some materials, but not a great amount. The company is smaller, along with its costs but the contracts it's pitching for are also smaller- remember back then they were talking volumes in the hundreds of millions of pounds.
The five year development cycle strikes me as arbitrary, dreamt up to manage expectations. The original Apple contract went through its development cycle in under two years, so if it's now extended it's probably a consequence of either greater challenges with Gen 2 materials or simply the companies involved aren't too pressed to throw more money at it.
I've been adding just now in a few chunks.
So 262599 @ 18.85p (£49500) done but seems to be a bit of selling after that print. Still a few sellers about it seems but no real pressure.
With regional wars now a reality and in some peoples', including my own, opinion global war now looming large over the horizon I would have thought all this SWIR/NIR infrared technology has the potential for huge military/weapons capability enhancement???
I'm not sure whether that's the case with the new fab.
Makes you wonder.
The thing is we have worked on the materials for 2 years plus earlier work ? and i would imagine that what the company produce is not immediately replicable and that they have sought to protect their methods and processes along the way so one would hope they are ahead of competitors in how they go about things after that time and are capable of producing consistent commercial volumes..as they have told us they have the capacity to do. Also as far as i am aware Nanoco do not have an exclusive agreement with STM so publicising their materials are being used by someone like STM would be an enormous plus in seeking other markets i would have thought.
Maybe the secrecy at Nanoco's request until they are able to step up to much larger scale production of consistent quality. i.e. 2 year optimisation period with STM and want to get well ahead re: competitors.
Of course, there's nothing stranger than fiction and the truth can be stranger than that !
What’s odd is that with STM there has been no secret in how they are getting improved performance from short and near wave infrared sensors ..they very publicly have demonstrated at trade fairs as easily found and have even released a scientific paper on the subject ..all over the past several years ahead of apparently launching a commercial product incorporating the benefits of QDs in SWIR …yet they never mention the product or where they get the super dupa dots in their film from as far as i can tell. The commercial sensitivity in them producing such a product is not at all secret and the fact they have had a development agreement with Nanoco that has been extended is far from secret.It becomes increasing difficult to see what commercial Sensitivity is involved and why! You would have thought like Samsung the benefits of using new QD technology in what is presumably an industry leading new product might have been up front and centre in any marketing and product spec…yet nothing and never any recognition of Nanoco “a world leader” in QD developments involvement.
It’s very strange that they’re now talking a lot about quantum film swir sensors and are demo’ing them, but don’t seem to name the actual products. I just used Bing Copilot to identify the product code, but no joy.
I may just call the ST Micro product support line tomorrow and ask which of their SWIR sensors contain a quantum film, see if they’ll tell me.
Here’s where the talk about QD’s with the links to the videos already posted (I’m sure this has been shared before by others).
https://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/campaigns/sensors-converge-2023-demos.html
Cheers Xen0n, if you haven’t seen this one below, is the actual demo (the person you see on the stand in the video you posted). This one has been posted a few times on here.
http://st-videos.s3.amazonaws.com/SWIR-sensor-based-on-quantum-film.mp4
Not sure if this video has been posted already. Go 5:25 into the video - no new info as such, but describes the ST SWIR sensor with a layer of our quantum dots as "Super cool"!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otVZI5oOz78
Some cheerful info regards Lead and Cadmium and their global impact through e-waste :
https://nswai.org/docs/Lead%20and%20Cadmium%20Global%20Impacts%20Through%20E-Waste.pdf
IMO, it's an absolute disgrace regards the slow progress towards the complete banning of the use of cadmium.
The fact that companies are able to advertise their products i.e. screens as 'cadmium-free' just because they contain less than 100ppm eg. 99ppm is a joke. It diminishes and almost negates the years of hard work by Nanoco in achieving their unique ability to produce their truly cadmium free dots on a commercial scale.
I was of course referring to mass production of CFQD’s that was the subject … we have not commercially supplied CFQD’s to anyone ever as far as i am aware. Unless you think we have.