We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Riley, first lesson of trading don't look a the SP to see how a stock is doing or going to do unless your day trading then the signals are very important. The company SP is controlled by them short term when they have an interest in it. They supply the market liquidity not the company and they get to control what price they set regardless of how many trades are made in any direction. They will keep it down and slowly mop everything up to fill orders for big return clients, brokers and funds, or keep it down to see if the coming news is favourable and if their clients then want in etc. They'll keep it down with fear, late sale/sells postings so crossing trades look like either other and deal shares between companies without them going through the stock system and keeping the spread wide to halt movement and tighten it to let it go. Its their money they can basically do what they want. But when you see an absolute cert being held down like this its nearly always a good sign that their is lots of interest and some big investors want in, or is it????????? Their is lots on the internet on what MMs can do and what manipulation games they play. Its not all scientific and totally legal but they bring the cash to the table and the FCA obviously don't look to hard if at all........
I'm not sure that this explains yesterday. £180k of buys, £14k of sells.....
The MM's are completely controlling this.
What is difficult to understand is that surely MM's want price movement. Price movement causes activity be it up or down. Activity is where the MM's get paid.
Therefore limiting the movement is surely self defeating for the MM's.... Unless, there is a reason.
As for shares sold or buy , MMs control the price within a certain parameter but if the shares go south or north beyond there control then markets control the outcome i.e more then 10%.
Also MMs can reset the price in the morning up or down , was bemused that a share held went up daily not by shares sold but MMs upping each day and mainly in tight held shares.
Be very surprised if Microsoft buys out Loopup , why and that's simple competition rules and would be seen to be taking out Loopup as no1 provider of secure mobile/telephone to cloud based conference calls.
Mind you thinking about this , there is no conflict except Loopup own platform.
There are a number of Institutional Investors who paid 400p per ahare and know the true potential value of Loopup, so wiil be reluctant to support a takeover for less than 400p.
All a game. Virtually no sells today but volume down a bit.
Be nice if there was a takeover, not sure why Microsoft dont just take them out and add they cloud tech directly rather than indirectly to their customers.
It does beg the question though why are they holding this back....
It's actually been this way for a few weeks now, pretty consistently buys outnumbering sells yet it ends up in the red.
I really can't see why this won't increase rapidly at results but everyone already knows what they are going to be so why they haven't increased yet is a mystery.....
Somebody mentioned a takeover a few weeks ago and i think the idea was scoffed at but this is a company that in a year has no debt, has made a profit and has had the share price halved. The updates have not been very forthcoming and/or informative and 2 of the biggest shareholders are the owners... Maybe they are looking to get out?
In my experience, companies that drive down their debt and have low market caps are ripe for takeovers.....
and on top of that 3 big buys 30k 46k 25k and still bid 79 MMS do not want this up yet , but when its time it will be a big bang
I was thinking the same thing. How is that even possible........
If anyone can enlighten, I'm all ears.
£15k sold/£180k bought - price in the red, riddle me that.