London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
STP, stop watching James O'brien on LBC. You've caught the mor0n virus. We have established you do not understand economics, now we know you do not understand politics either. What else are you going to expose to us. Maybe give me a prediction on the Royal Rumble conundrum I am having and all will be forgotten
If anyone understood politics they would already know that it is pointless voting. The age old saying p1551ng in the same pot has never rung so true. We all know that the varied colourful options that allow us the pretence of representation are exactly just that. To think the people deserve more/if any power than those that allow them to work in these big businesses is absolutely absurd. If we were truly represented would we have the ridiculously high taxes we have with ridiculously low services in return?
Labour will be no different what so ever to the Conservatives. Neither will the safety net of the Reform Party. I say safety net because when people lose all faith it's a good policy to have an alternative faith in it's place just rising through the ranks...
Reform will get my vote, even if it's because of the fact the other 2 are USELESS!!!!
Tories are crooks lining their own pockets.
Labour will have an Amnesty to the Boat people, which will create an open Border freely issuing Passports.. OH, and they have no clue how to spend the Public purse
None of them deserve my vote. I think we are in for the lowest turnout ever in any election around the globe. No turnout figures were publicised in MSM on the local elections and I'm guessing if you want the numbers on the next general one, you will have to search long and hard after va very long wait to find out the true picture. Which is what I believe to be, that the feeling of democracy doesn't work, when it's so not represented. I thought all those billionaires were building nuclear bunkers because of Putin. I'm thinking more that it's because a huge swathe of an up rising is well over due for the west. We are now witnessing the latter stages of how those many civilisations before us ended.
Here's a question to ponder. Why has none of our MSM been calling for peace talks against another nuclear state, yet they are with people who fight with sticks and stones? Are they more afraid of those who have nothing? The writings on the wall, but the blind leading the blind never write it in brail unfortunately.
On an optimistic note enjoy your weekend people as if it were your last.
The BBC did report turnout with little writing in the bottom left hand side of there slides. 30 to 40% turnout and not one reporter even mentioned it?
A bit of a shame the chap who started the tread is already filtered.
STP......"A bit of a shame the chap who started the tread is already filtered."
How do you know who the chap who started the thread was if you already had him filtered? š
O dear hardup, you're not the sharpest pencil in the cup!
First post doesn't have 'RE:', understand now?
Also, all I saw was someone was filtered, but I never said I knew who they were, only that they were filtered.
Please hardup, do try to keep up!
ATB
STP......If you have someone filtered all you see is a green box, nothing else, no thread title and no ID. And none of the others who replied mentioned that persons ID.
O dear hardup, I'll try again, I never mentioned their ID.
I just saw that they were filtered.
Obviously someone I had taken umbrage to previously.
Capiche?
STP......how did you know what thread that filtered message was on?
OMG hardup, test the patience of a saint!
The absence of the start of the thread with a 'RE:' at the beginning.
So no post with 'STP AKA James O'Brien in disguise'. alone.
Not sure if you are on a wind up or you have a slate missing.
You're coming across as the lights are on, but there is nobody at home, so I hope you are on a wind up, for your sake...
LTI,
If a tread starts without the RE: Does that indicate it is the origin of that thread ?
If that is true then the thread started 10th May 14.12 by VirSteele.
I admit to not being the sharpest pencil ,but it is confusing that some people need to use various names to contribute to this forum ,and it is my opinion they serve no useful purpose and should be restricted to using only ONE name.
Apologies it should have been directed to stp NOT lti