Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
That sounds a lot better, LOL it’s a start, LOL
anything can happen in the share buying world, up and to Fum being valued at many hundreds of millions of pounds. Our med gel is very valuable, but nobody knows how valuable?
GLA
Ahhh you got me ...Guess ill have to settle for 29p buy in then ...Ah well...
BUY BUY BUY BUY..........
zwartkopts Talk about.... calling the kettle black.
here's just a small sample of 5 of your own post below. taken from your own history.
zwartkops = 50p Will be way back in the horizon come the 14th......We will be back to to at least the 96p we had back in Sept 2016
Zwartkopts = This is one of the safest shares on the market with probably the biggest potential to be a global player with high revenue and low outlay.
Zwartkops = What's more the SP has the capacity to produce multibagging spikes along its journey.....
This coming 2 weeks will prove just that
Zwartkopts = im anticipating 50p before cob this Friday.
Too risky to try and get in after Friday then who knows? SP has hit 90p plus on good news before.
Should a TO happen we must be looking at £2.50 upwards
Zwartkopts = My bugs....This will scream up to 60 70p in a couple of hours anytime before the 14th....
Off course Zwartkopts you weren't trying to persuade anyone to buy any shares in fum...LOL LOL
enjoy zwartkopts, just a we sample you posted, there's plenty more were they came from, and all in your own writing, Hypocrite or what LOL. I'V a very busy day today, So put this in your pipe and smoke it, LOL
KIND Regards Tommy LOL LOL
What do you say to those guys who you helped to persuade to buy in at plus 40p Tommy Boy?
Spouting your unfounded drivel about high expectations..It's wrong .....
See you at sub 20....not long now
Apparently a couple of the Lombard research analysts were on the trial, and the gel didn’t work for them! Everyone one else was having a great time standing to attention, but sadly for these dudes they were left lame and are keen to bail out, DYOR as they say. I’ve got my buy order at 30.1 and will hopefully ride this bad boy home! GLA
The time to worry is when you hear the name Darwin Strategic and convertible loan notes in the same sentence as FUM. Those boys will take a company down like a crocodile takes down a wilder beast crossing a river - they'll roll it over and over taking big bites out of it as they slowly kill it. Those boys shorted and took down BHR in 2015 and cost me and many others dearly. Let's all pray Lombard are in this for the long term or at least until we get bought out.
I'be come across these aggressive sort of outfits before. Hope we do not get shafted
Bandet1 I appreciate your kind words and endorsement , I also appreciate yours very much,
It’s great to get a insight into other investors minds, good and bad, though not to bad. LOL,
Everyone’s loyal, but only up to a point, and that normal equates to the amount of profit or losses anyone makes, even our BOD would leave with the right offer.LOL,
As long as you expect anything to happen here, then you own the right share.
What I don’t want to happen to Fum , is to part with our med gel to cheaply, as it’s potentially a blockbuster of a product . But more especially it’s essentially needed by urologist to prescribe to ED patients . Never mind the OTC market, which could be truly massive.
If we do well in the prescription market, then our share price should in advance price in the OTC market. And by several years.
GLA
BruceJamieson There’s nothing illegal About anything Lombards done, it’s just a underhanded way of increasing your shareholding for less money, and taking advantage of a company needing urgent funding, their shape-shooting investment advisors have told them to do it, and it’s perfectly legal, just not very commendable. That’s life for you,
James Barder stated way before csd, that our med Gel was the most valuable product we had, but the cost to bring it to market was prohibitive, and that was around the time of the great financial-meltdown, and recession , few people could raise any funds for anything, including the banks, speak to Noel Edmonds about that one, or google it .
We are probably curtailed at the moment from the history of futura medical, but this med gel looks completely different from anything before it, there’s several silly concoctions out there selling loads at the moment, and our med gel can easily take there market share away from them very easily, we beat them in every area of testing, application, usability, likability, to be genuinely honest, these other products are horrendous, and they are selling, because there is a need for them out there, and that’s we’re we come in , with all guns blazing,
I think I’m getting carried away here,LoL, but you get the picture . We can take this market easily, the urologist will give our med gel the big thumbs up, they’ve effectively already done that from our 2trials results. And our 3rd trial results should increase the amount of urologist thumbs going up.
If a big multinational pharmaceutical company takes a bet on us , taking us out at a few hundred million, they could very well clean up here after a few years, and especially hitting the OTC market with our med gel, the little handy med gel for all occasions, who wouldn’t want there loved one to put it on them. And that translates into some serious money. But who has the foresight to get in early? Pfizer, ? Any of the big condom makers ? Or the opportunistic Chinese , and hopefully backed by there unscrupulous very rich government ,
right now nobody knows how big this could be, nobody, and that’s what makes this a unbelievably speculative investment proposition. at worst it’s going to do really well , and at best it could make today’s share holders seriously rich. That’s how good a proposition we have sitting in front of us all today.
Good Luck All .
Thomasbrowne - you are clearly a loyal shareholder here who contributes regularly, which has to be applauded, in supporting your investment decision. I am also a shareholder but don’t post very often as there is little to say at the moment apart from speculating about the results of P3 trials and a potential commercial license deal which will be announced in the fullness of time. For all invested we hope they are very positive and enable the BOD to secure a deal without the need for much more dilution. I feel that our BOD are inexperienced commercially, have made some schoolboy errors along the way including reference to dilutive fund raising more recently ( unnecessary IMO) in the RNS then to omit to mention potential dilution in post-RNS presentations presumably on the advice of some adviser , is a little amateur in my book, but we all make mistakes. When you are running a listed company these mistakes have consequences however and this has contributed to the recent sharp drop IMO as that is how AIM works. Re LO, I have said before and I will say again that people should do some research on funds such as Lombard. They are past masters at taking a punt when companies are in need of cash and screw an attractive deal out of the BOD and who can blame them as there is no guarantee of eventual success. I have invested in numerous companies where LO or Capital or some other aggressive fund participate at a low price, the consequences being that they will sell down over time, usually into a rise to minimize the drag and often with the aim of ultimately having a free carry. Do this week in, week out across sectors and it is a good business model. It is a little rich IMO for shareholders to complain that it moderates any increase and increases volatility as LO stepped up and took a risk some time ago and are being rewarded handsomely for that. I say suck it up as a part of the competitive market dynamics but as long as you are aware of their motives you can build that into your own investment decisions. Good luck all.
Why would they not so it by using financial instruments. By being a large holder a very risky business to try to get the price down and then buy back. They might not go up again. I still think the situation is bonkers if true which I doubt. It would need the cooperation of mm who would have to create a false market which is illegal and strictly enforced.
BruceJamieson read warrennibbles post again, further down ,
If we sell loads of shares they go down, if Lombard sell loads of shares they go down, and spooking small investors into selling some or all their holding, throw in urgent funding needs, and its a recipe for a very low SP, and Lombard picking up shares on the cheap. No one can legally accuse them of it, And do anything about it, as it’s somehow a acceptable funding practice in this day and age. And We’re also helpless. Fum don’t really care how they get the money, as long as they get it and pay there own wages and trial cost , that’s the bottom line on it. No money, no company,.
It’s deplorable, but what can you do, virtually nothing, ,LOL /not .
GLA
Nothing
and precisely how would Lombard Odi e r manipulate the share price downwards and why as a major holder would they want to. Makes no sense at all.
The last fund raising, ! We didn't know exactly what Lombard were up too, but isn't hindsight a wonderful thing,
To put it into perspective, if it happened again , private investors would remortgage their homes and buy fum shares at below 6p. And sell at anything up to 49p.
If Lombard decided to do the same again , there's very little we could do. Though I doubt they would attempt that exact same stunt again/ price wise.
If fum could even hint at the size of the companies in licencing negotiations with us , then it might give us a clue to the potential size and type of money and potential we are talking about. Lombard shouldn't be allowed to drive our SP downwards because they want the biggest amount of shares for there money and backing. They've already done that to us.
Our BOD need to give more presentations to potential investors, I know this is difficult before our 3rd trials results , but they should at least counteract lombards deplorable tactics.
On the release of our 3rd trial results in December, we should get substantial main media writups, and I'm confident all very positive . And I would expect the world's media will also carry our results all around the world, I'm hoping some Chinese ED company will snap us up, in licencing or straight buyout, and backed by the Chinese government in whatever form they want,
there money is as good as anyone's, it's only a ED GEL we are talking about , not a nuclear power station,LOL
GOOD LUCK ALL.
Bruce- If you held 10 items which formed a significant holding of a rare commodity and could sell 8 items forcing the price to fall all the way down to 80% below its market value, safe in the knowledge that you had the right to buy 20 items at this low price knowing they were undervalued, would you try and manipulate the price in order to get that item at a 'knock off' price? What would you do if there was no comeback on you ?
By would a large holder attempt to manipulate the price down. That really is a very strange idea
Exactly one year ago today I believe the deal was struck for Lombard to support Futura in the dilution , cumulating Lombard with around 26% of our Futura. Although this purchase has become so controlling for Lombard it was as I said previously the only way in which Futura could survive and keep all us share holders in business. It was also in my opinion the saving grace for JB not having his Gerald Ratner moment and killing the company off completely with his Punchy Numbers.
Lombard on this day a year ago , I believe started selling their shares around 19p crushing the share price down down down until the dilution was announced by Futura.
As much as Lombard are controlling the share price we all need to remember Futura would be history now if they hadn’t have stepped in with their support. They will do whatever they feel fit with their shares manipulating the price with their sells.
So here we are three months to go to results and exciting times, I would never go as far as Thomas and suggest that I am 100% certain of good results but all evidence up until now supports a great outcome. All fingers crossed, we are very much at the races still approaching the final furlong for results.