We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Does that mean there is no value in sell the licence to our oil field in a fire sal? Is the block worth feck all like our shares?
Monti
Just thought on 2 words.
In end think it was your goodself that went along lines of SN offering a % of £1 per share & getting Frr back.
Enjoy
Well, you could add another word to your two words list Ars221, which is neutral, meaning it’s progressing ie there is a proposal which is subject to Creditor vote. Alternatively, the report from Deloitte was only completed post the 14th March meeting which is circulated but awaiting a follow up creditor meeting. We can all guess/assume that the Deloitte report will not be pretty reading but the important question is whether there is a deal from SN to try and put FRC back to pre-wind up condition.
Given there is no money or assets in FRC, and noting Deloitte is not a charity, we can expect a quick conclusion one way or another.
****nal221,
100% correct , i am taking your comment as a lucky charm 🍀
the untouchables!
gla real holders
Overall only ether of 2 words need to be used positive or negative.
Enjoy
Out of interest, if it’s game over then why not just disclose this from the report?
FORGOT TO TURN THE CAPS OF SORRY.
Tabs, there's more life in a tramps vest.
THANKS GUYS HAVE JUST EMAILED dELOITTE AND FILLED IN THE FORM SO JUST WAITING ON THEM GETTING BACK TO ME THANKS TOATIE.
Tsbs: We all know the facts: we are shareholders in a Company that is currently being liquidated. As part of that process the Liquidators produced a first statement which included that they had discovered no liquid assets and that there were creditor claims. These are the facts.
As part of that process they've now produced a Liquidators' report. I have been told not to say anything about what's in that report.
ODR from what youve seen has this any more mileage
ODR, firstly nothing to apologise for and many thanks for the out reach to FSHG.
Dare I ask on Jonathansxx post, did it read hopeful to yourself or not? Don’t feel you need to answer them that’s completely fine and thanks again for updating us all.
I am personally of mind Looed’s lack of posts is purely down to nothing to say that Looed hasn’t already covered before.
We sit and await the news we real holders crave.
GLA
Good morning Lifeishard. Apologies I missed Avi8r's post. However, I did reach out to FSHG via a friend on Whatsapp first thing yesterday. I was concerned at the Liquidator cost in having to verify shareholdings before sharing the report, especially as my email was dealt with at Director level(!), which will be expensive. So I suggested that FSHG approach the Liquidator direct and suggest that they could distribute the report to their, already verified, member base, and in so doing save a big chunk of Liquidator costs. I haven't heard anything back from FSHG yet.
Wasn’t he one of Zaza’s enablers? Even after Zaza was found out Mole failed to criticise him.
From this BB moleinahole, whatever happened to him?. Last posted on IOG at the end of August 2023 .
I wonder what he would be thinking. Much like me I suspect, done over and truly stuffed by sheer incompetence.
...........but you never know!
Hi ODR,
As I haven’t seen or read a response to Avi8r’s post or to Jonathansxx ‘s post , can I read into this as the response you received was probably a legal generic mail sent from Deloitte ??
ODR
Appreciate your reply .
Agreed …lets move on
Ziggy: I didn't receive the minutes of the meeting, I received the Liquidators' report which should have been prepared and presented at the meeting, but wasn't finalised until after the meeting.
I accept the sniping point. Being a longstanding stalwart of this Board you will understand that I didn't start that particular round of sniping and was the recipient, but in respect of yours, and I am sure many others, views I will now let that issue lie.
Toatie: apologies I have been out for the day. Thank you for answering the question Bezzy; all the best.
Was SN there? Or did he swerve the meeting?
ODR
Many thanks for informing us you have received minutes of the creditor meeting .
I understand your reluctance to share the minutes with those who don’t have required format of proof of shares or have found it difficult to obtain the required paperwork from their dealing platforms . I would be just as reluctant .
However in the spirit of established cooperation and help that this board is I had hoped to have read further on in your post that you had emailed Deloittes asking if you ( or any other recipient of the minutes) would be able to share on this board a précis of the documents relevant points of interest to shareholders.
Maybe you had that in mind but felt rather than exploring that avenue before posing your message , it would be more satisfying instead to use the opportunity presented by receiving the minutes to snipe at other members , some of whom have provided you with good info over the years .
Toatie:
frcliquidation@deloitte.com
Kind regards,
Bezzy
Hi if you could post the address to contact Deloitte it would be good that way myself and any others who have a shareholding may contact them for a co[py of this report thanks in advance toatie.
ODR, after reading the report, how did you feel, happy, sad, hopeful?🤔
NJames: I have seen nothing that says the Liquidators took issue with the content... or that it caused the Company to lose credibility?! Do please share if you have any evidence of such. I'm sure you wouldn't make such remarks without evidence would you?