We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Neo you dont need to try that hard to make yourswelf look a twat.
One thing about the licences we can agree on is they arent free but I am sure the board are aware of that so would rosgeo who will have obviously done a bit of DD on EUA prior to signing a legally binding contract. Do you not think IF they thought EUA was a 2 bit outfit they would have proceeded with the agreement ??
Rather than send you to read the RNS dated 26th March which you wouldnt we dont really have to worry to much about the cost. Please read
Eurasia has paid an initial consideration of c.US$0.5 million of cash (the "Initial Consideration") for its share in the JV. In addition, incremental consideration would become payable under an earn-out structure (the "Earnout") in the event that Eurasia decides to proceed to develop the Additional Assets. The total of the Initial Consideration and the Earnout (if applicable) is capped at 75% of the value set under the relevant Russian law if the Additional Assets had initially been auctioned by the Russian state instead of being acquired by Rosgeo.
When did the BOD admit anything regarding governance. Palladium may be off the highs but the pound is now a lot weaker against USD.
Need to try harder I am afraid.
GLA Genuine investors
Whenever I see someone aggressively push the word 'facts' it is always followed with a negative conjecture. Always very disappointing.... and dull.
Who do you claim is homophobic b1ll ? do tell. Got the keyboard warrior bravery to say it but not to say who ?? As for stork he only admitted his posiiton after he was caught/ called out etc untiul then blatant falsehoods and pretence so i wouldnt hero worship that particular fantasist if i were you :)
Eua bod have left themselves open to some of this as they have admitted governance hasn't been a strong point. Think they need to get a move on now... palladium is well off the highs we saw...dont want this squandered
Wow really desperate negativity today. Neo and Giant steps seem almost hand in hand in this strategy. Perhaps they are an only twin?
Every single thing you write shows you have no understanding of what is happening. Just here because you sniffed you could get your mood hoover out to disrupt this board.
Pathetic, childish and worse of all - very very dull. If you want to bring your message hear at least try to be a little more interesting.
More facts! Well done.
We're watching it in real time! Could hold 40p a share. Drifted all over the 30s, now it is in the low 20s and likely heading back into the teens judging from past history. Needs to double just to get back to what you could've sold for a year ago
Genius investment strategy that is.
Eua is doing OK here.
TMS is defending his short position and we have low quality rampers in the mix too.
I'm surprised that a certain poster hasn't come out with any homophobic remarks today....he usually does when he's being made to look silly.
We can do this Eua!
Thanks for the facts son, let’s see how it plays out shall we?
lower entry mob layla 1 ! the pond dwellers of the de rampers.....they are the worst because they believe, they are just happy to lie to cause others to lose so they gain a fraction of a point extra. i can honestly say that unless i really dislike an individual for other serious reasons i would not stoop to this ever !! its called a moral compass a few people should search for theirs.
Well let's try some facts - over a year of hush hush big deal happening, everybody wants our assets yet we haven't managed to conclude a deal in over a year! Pd soon to be in massive oversupply on ICE engines are replaced by fully EVs, no numbers yet on what you need to pay for the rosgeo licenses cos they sure ain't free! Loss making annual P&L, missed the biggest opportunity ever to extract PGMs and sell during the ST boom based on ICE emissions needs (still no mine construction begun to extract these millions of ounces). Basically they've mined very little, run at a loss, and have been played by the big boys who just want to keep their Pd supply in the ground for a few extra years so they can get higher prices for the stuff NN, SS and the rest are extracting and selling every day! But OF COURSE such a company is worth tens of billions! So tell me this, if this is a ten to twenty bagger any day now, why haven't the smartest investors in the world been building massive positions? Even Buffet would be glad of a few extra billon for a nailed on ten bagger for a few hundred million! Reality is you've been played like a fiddle, son!
New poster is neo****ox. Only registered nine days ago and incessantly posted negative tripe regarding Eurasia.
Makes you wonder why they invested? Mmm ;-)
Yes Neo, both of those RNS’ are good reference points. It’s a shame that the age of them is an issue for you, I suspect that the board are proceeding in a way to maximise shareholder gain rather than to satisfy your timeframe. When did you last sell a large PGM asset?
Certainly neo difference is i and most " rampers" dont lie, cheat, create false accouts, pretend to be what they are not and most are Subjectively honest about their position ya dingo :) Ie, i am long and i beleive x,y,z ! Honest subjectivity ill accept all day long, dishonest pretense @ objectivity to hide an agenda ??? well that is unconsionable :) Ya see the difference ya pelican :)
Neocantus,
DLA are just the hired legals?, seems to me a funny way to run a business, legals don't come cheap, so why pay DLA on the basis that its all a bubble. I'm pretty sure they would have noticed by now, and said "let's not say anything to this BOD's", just keep taking the money, and see how long we can string it out. Please, at least present a decent argument, not pure fantasy, unless as I and many others suspect, it suits your narrative
Is that the two month old rns saying the jorc would be released shortly? Or the rns saying an unidentified buyer has offered an unidentified amount for an unidentified selection of eurasia's assets? When you actually look at it, the rnses haven't promised much of anything, and yet people on here talk as if they've been handed the stars on a silver platter!
Probably better to trust the RNS’ rather than pumpers, dumpers or randomers on a chat forum Neocantus.
By the same logic, mental, all longs are self-interested rampers whose views are as equally credible as a nine bob note!
See stork i read that ! I took it on board ! I placed it on the scales and on the other side i placed the fact that you are a self confessed shorter and a patently obviously biased poster and the result is ......... irelevant because your view is totally self serving and therefore as much use as a chocolate teapot ! But thanks for sharing all the same lol
I really don't see why any professional services firms would suffer reputational loss. DLA are just the hired legals, citic and ubs are trying to flock the company for the highest price as is their contractual duty (although it seems noone wants to buy) and WA have done their technical assessments as they were contracted to. I suspect if it does transpire to be a big bubble, the people who will really get in trouble will be the auditors, look at what happened to AA with enron, and KPMG after quindell. Interesting times ahead here, that's for sure!