Fulcrum Metals boost Saskatchewan uranium exploration assets by 221% to 59,000 acres. Watch the full video here.
B1ll, Your beginning to sound desperate, all the genuine holders here can see you for what you are, non factual, non invested, weird and attention seeking troll. You keep going mate, reaffirming everything I post about you, well sussed.
B1ll, your last post sums you up clearly, I’ve been here since 2016, remain invested, unlike you, not invested and camped out on this Board, every day.
You’re the type of guy, who pulls the pin out of a grenade, then passes it to some else to throw, whilst declaring it was nothing to do with you.
More lies from the non invested crew, its all they have when asked for facts. I'm fortunate not to be underwater, as many are, and the only reason I post this, is to make those who are invested see what lies these people will state, to suit their narrative.
In any company, you will find directors appointed for what that business believes will enhance their value, attain certain goals, and advance their objectives. The time scale to achieve such goals is determined by many factors, and we are not privy to those factors. Your view seems to be " what are we paying these people for", because you cannot see instant results. You and others insinuate that the Board are somewhat just living a champagne lifestyle, and paying each other salaries, as some sort of mad scam. Not sure if Directors, of Artems standing want their legacy to be " I was part of this scam", I can only trust our Board are doing their very best in difficult circumstances to get the best result possible for invested shareholders. If as you appear to believe its a shambles, then you have stated your case and no longer need to state the same line again and again.
BP, You are right when posters post about 4p today and 10p by week end, but it's how you react to such quotes. It can be misconstrued as Ramping or enthusiasm, best to ignore both concepts, and not involve yourself in trading insults.
Sometimes realism in your view, is valid even though portrayed as being negative, for negative sake, and invokes a reaction from positive posters, who see it as a means to talk down a share they are invested in. Its emotional and ends up with the board being cluttered with opinions and non factual info. Best stick to facts we know and remain hopeful of facts to come.