Stephan Bernstein, CEO of GreenRoc, details the PFS results for the new graphite processing plant. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Nicely at this level good to see still holding these for a very good reason i believe in doc and the bod .taking shares instead of the money shows there not like other bod on aim ..bodes well with me
Nice 1 Tamer …..keep Them Coming …..
…… https://x.com/dds_docholiday/status/1730488920574480599?s=46
….. https://x.com/dds_docholiday/status/1730522777352822904?s=46
Grezzz: Incidentally, I do totally agree with your generic comment about the often appalling standard of written English on these BBs. 'Some might even say it's an indication of the writer's intellect...' - One might very well think that; I couldn't possibly comment (a Francis Urquhart quote I believe?)!
Grezzz: My assertion is that either 'of' or 'on' would be acceptable ('on' being the more traditional) - but not 'in' (in that context).
TalkingSense(?) "Notrex/Grezz.......News flash ......No-one else give a toss about the grammar".
The evidence would suggest that at least two of us do.
Furthermore, for any serious investors wishing to peruse these boards to glean some insight into the subject company, having to decipher mangled and sometimes incomprehensible English wastes both time and patience. Some might even say it's an indication of the writer's intellect...
I didn't have the salary sacrifice RNS on the list.....Still plenty more to come over the next couple of months:
News flow due:
Lolworth latest gold sampling results
Lolworth REE sampling (I seem to recall this being referenced in a recent interview)
Drilling Contractor and Drill start date confirmation
Drilling Started confirmation (before Xmas)
Then Drilling completion and results (likely January)
Others that may appear at some point:
Disposal of Assets (rigs/ licenses/machinery/property)
JV (just for you TI)
Further drilling campaigns
Notrex/Grezz.......News flash ......No-one else give a toss about the grammar.
Notrex, Why don't you actually post something about ECR , rather than just lambasting other posters....90% of your posts in the last 24 hours are poster and not ECR related
With regards to the 'sticky hands' selling , Doc said in a recent interview that they review the share register weekly and the investors still had their holding. It is actually a trader who has a large holding and is trading between 0.2 and 0.25 regularly.
Obviously I will take their word for this unless you have any actual evidence that the 'sticky hands' investors have sold.
Notrex "Grezzz: 'With regard to 'thesis', the word generally relates to a written article rather than thoughts or theories held in one's head. Accordingly, conventionally, it would be a thesis 'on' a given subject.' I'm glad you concur with me that it should indeed have been 'on', not 'in'".
You suggested it should have been 'thesis of'.
Grezzz: 'With regard to 'thesis', the word generally relates to a written article rather than thoughts or theories held in one's head. Accordingly, conventionally, it would be a thesis 'on' a given subject.' I'm glad you concur with me that it should indeed have been 'on', not 'in'.
Notrex "Hello Blackhopper - so you're another one who's command of the English language is tenuous I see. Those scabby Comprehensive schools you semi-literate clowns attended have a lot to answer for eh?"
The possessive form of 'who' is 'whose'. 'Who's' is a contraction of 'who is'. This is elementary grammar.
With regard to 'thesis', the word generally relates to a written article rather than thoughts or theories held in one's head. Accordingly, conventionally, it would be a thesis 'on' a given subject. Additionally, 'comprehensive' in the context of your sentence should not be capitalised. You should have also included a comma after the word tenuous and after 'for' in your last sentence.
If you did indeed attend a selective school, you either didn't pay attention, or you were one of those who fluked the entrance exam. It happens...
Oliver: We were told the mates-rates 0.175p issue holders would have 'sticky-hands' too - that hasn't gone too well has it eh!?
…….. https://x.com/dds_docholiday/status/1730503007773528352?s=46
Notrex, no, not at this stage they wont. Ultimately yes, as would most, I am not naive, I know people and credibility in this case will come first.
Capitals-boy - That's the fourth time you've posted that (and it was mindless ramping trash first time) - is your memory really that bad!?
Oliver: They will do whatever is best for them - as is the norm. To think otherwise is naïve - you need to get real.
They wont sell until the SP has at least doubled, even if they do then. Even then, imo, it would be in dribs and drabs if they actually needed the cash.
Seems a good deal for them as that comes to over £40,000 if they sold them immediately, unless my maths is wrong?
Price: 0.21
No Opinion
RE: CHURN23 Nov 2023 19:24
940 Million Ish Shares Traded ….Since The 10th Of October….
I’m Going For …1 Billion Shares Traded …Before The Placing Shares …Have Washed Through …Probably Around The End Of Next Week …..Teeing Us Up For A Nice …Santa Rally …
Will We Get A 60 Million Volume Day …..
Number 4 - thanks Kevin, I can get to bed now with some serious sleep inducing material from you!! LoL
Jusqu'a demain.
…..and what do approaches lead to ……..? 😉
Looking forward to seeing what comes out of drilling. Big risk as always exploration is. If the gold was sticking out of the ground, the old timers would have got it all already (perhaps Notrex doesn't understand this). All ECR can do is reduce the risks and increase probabilities of success, this is done by rock chips and soil sampling. We know ECR has already identified some of these bull's-eyes in the Creswick area, they just need to drill test and hope there is some chance of commercial success.
Victoria is narrow small veins but the commercial success is in the grades and finding the grade continuity to depth.
It is always good to have an approach of interest from a bigger Company. YES it is only an approach. However, if Victoria exploration does come out of the current lull, Hopefully ECR will gain some traction on the SP. Having ground even near successful ground (Fosterville/Southern Cross) boosts the SP temporarily. ECR needs to battle through this period, hopefully some drill hits might turn peoples ears.
'you all been keyboard warriors with nosex'
It's quite evident what he does and does not get, bitter and twisted little boy in his bed sit with rising damp.
Nice but dim Tim, thats his name.