Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Your views are not balanced and mine is not rose tinted. In the filter bin with you ciao ciao
@Sprat1982 - more than £200M has been raised but I think you know this already. The discussion groups are here to give all a balanced view. Not just rose tinted.
In my opinion more funding will be requested and that will mean further dilution and that means a lower share price than now. Watch this space.
..and you continue to return to this chat to see responses to your posts through out the day…that is just weird for some one not invested..and even weirder for some one trying to save the people from themselves..perhaps you should spend the time with your loved ones.
ah! ofcourse you spend your day posting views on share bb’s that youre not invested in. i guess it’s not just cirata but others too..oh hold on the only bb you have posted on in the last 30 days have been on cirata only…lol…so you either have multiple accounts for different shares where you post to save investors from themselves or just the one for cirata and post only here . oh man now i’ve heard it all and you e made yourself look like a total ****. well done clown.
Because it's a discussion board and I see some shameless puff which I want to offer an alternative opinion on. If these boards become only a place for positive opinion, where's the value. If someone is considering Cirata as an investment, at least there are alternative perspectives to consider? On of the challenges of regulation changes in recent years has been the lack of access to commercial research for retail investors. Take a look at Ian Spence at Megabuyte as one of excellent commentators on this issue.
So why do you post your opinions here? I mean other than to warn investors
I'm not and never will be. I have strong opinions which I have shared in previous posts so I'll spare you the very long version.
In my view, this is the sort of car wreck that gives the AIM market a bad name. Over blown promises - terrible corporate goverance, ego inflating expenses by execs inflicted on shareholders, alongside the personal gains extracted. Even today in the new world, the senior management have been given a no lose bet in the free matching shares plus entry options without performance conditions. Do any comparatives of growth rates, ebitda, cash burn, 12 year track record of failure... there are so many UK success stories and we need a healthy investable public market - and this company is part of the reason why confidence is so low / net outflow. .. In my humble opinion!!
Well ofcourse I meant since Kelly took over.
And I guess an obvious questions is what keeps you invested Raven?,
About £230M's worth ... with remarably little to show for it!!
or to quote Stephen Kelly.."The reality is that, since its IPO in 2012, the Company has raised $270m but without delivering consistent sales momentum." April 2024 final results RNS
Meister, how many times have investors had to stump up money so far?
@Sinitta - good point raised but I doubt very much that the directors will be putting any of their monies in. They are expecting the shares to go lower since they will need fund raising. I am not sure how many times investors will be asked to keep stumping up more money.
Well said. If there is no recovery next week after this rocky period in general and everyone gets over their jitters then certainly yes this would be viewed as a positive move!
Surely the directors need to put their hands in their pockets and support this company with share purchases. No longer in a closed period so should support the company with their on cash as shareholders are doing.