Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Ps …I mixed you up with dick olderwiser
OaW….you are indeed correct so accept my apology as I fall on my sword.
Hi OaW.
My calculation of the 1tcf potential was not based on continuity of the deeper reservoir between prospects, but based on the same prospect area as the shallow low risk reservoirs, but at a reservoir thickness of 150 meters, being 50% of what was found previously in lnb1.
Good question about the challenges of drilling the deeper lnb 1 reservoir, chariot have a very experienced drilling team and I am sure they will be planning to deal with those issues encountered by predator at mou 2 and by SDX on deep lnb1.
Jimmy
Thanks for that, Jimmy.
To get towards your 1Tcf target, does gas need to be confirmed at both well locations, indicating continuity between the two prospects?
And is there any potential problem about well formation damage such as Prd encountered at MOU-2?
Good evening OaW.
There are two targets in the forthcoming loukos wells.
Both reservoir targets were previously intersected by SDX in previous wells .
The shallower target intersected a gas water contact and was relatively thin reservoirs, the deeper prospect interesected a gross reservoir of 300 meters with strong gas shows , but could not be wire line logged due to reservoir conditions.
Because these reservoirs are the same age as the offshore anchois b sands , chariot were able to reprocess he 3D seismic and identify the 100 bcf prospects up dip from the lnb 1 well drilled by SDX.
SDX, had not reprocessed the seismic and hence missed the opportunity for follow up drilling.
The 1tcf prospect opportunity for the area only applies if the deeper reservoir found in lnb 1 is gas bearing up dip, and this deeper reservoir has been identified in the new seismic up dip and will be drilled by each of the forthcoming 2wells
Because chariot have such a great database for these reservoirs from offshore it allows them to identify such opportunities.
I feel very confident gas will be found , and there is a reasonable chance for gas in the deeper reservoir.
Jimmy
Dbh, you're the ****, I'm afraid. Please check the handles again. I've never been anywhere near matd. Ever .
The trades have definitely changed from consistent sells Jan - March to now lots of buys and sells, the buys seem to be outweighing sells. Wild theory- the seller is out and someone else is accumulating while trying to keep the price down.
You wouldn't think it from the price action! Very strange right now.
Last SDX drill was 24 days but that was 2000m. This one is under 1500 meters so say 16-19 days? Spud was 3rd so we could have a rig heading our way by the weekend.
Ow….well let’s hope you have changed from being the compulsive dick on Matd and treat others with respect
Aha. Well observed!
I am a shareholder here as of this week, again. I think the timing is just about right, but I never get the lowest prices.
OW, are you still just in PRD or have you moved some monies here?
Good afternoon Jimmy.
I've just listened to the March Loukos Pre-Drill webcast. Very succinctly delivered by Duncan Wallace.
Regarding the Loukos acreage, some troublemaker over on the other bb has suggested that this is a "SDX cast-off", rather disparagingly. I am assuming that SDX did let this go, but can you confirm that, and why didn't SDX make a success of it, if indeed this is a low-risk play, as Duncan (and you) suggest?
As well, I know you have made mention of a possible 1Tcf resource potential at Loukos, with drilling success at the deeper sands. But CHAR make mention in the webcast of just 100Bcf+ (page 8), and this being a longer term opportunity. So I'm thinking this will not get drilled in the 2-well drilling program this Summer. Am I right in assuming that? And why the 100Bcf-1Tcf difference?
ATB.