focusIR May 2024 Investor Webinar: Blue Whale, Kavango, Taseko Mines & CQS Natural Resources. Catch up with the webinar here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Bfd
Good job the trolls here arnt anygood
Sp would be in a right mess
So glad the manipulators have disappeared too, dont have to listen to those vastly underwater bleating on about them
On wards and upwards, SP absolutely flying
If you want to see the business holistically daytrade why do you continually refer to one deal from several years ago when a number of brands have been purchased subsequently, most notably Debenhams? Why then try to portray that deal as a failure when the sp reacted positively at the time?
Have you look at the February RNS to look at the share holdings of all the non execs? And let's not forget that the first execs own more than 20% of the business with their families
Once again, wouldn't fit with your agenda to show the whole picture would it daytrade?
I'm really not sure why you bother, you and the boys aren't particularly good at this trolling game, maybe go and have a look at something like the EUA board where the trolls could teach you a thing or two. Atleast they have the honesty to admit they have no investment
Failed teacher just woke up
Why thank you Sam
Blimey those goal posts are in the stands now, they get moved so often they should be on wheels. Deflectometer now on overload, nonsensometer switched on.
Glad to see you state that (quote)" plt are maybe worthless now".
id not have suggested that myself, but BOO undoutably paid over the odds given its current value, as i have said. If you think they are "worthless" then fair play to you, im happy to hear anothers opinion, even when i disagree.
Asos, i dont hold them so i dont really care about them, but its an accepted view, held by most sensible investors that director buys show confidence in their companies, lack of them the opposite.. Several others on here mention it too. Upto you if you think the contrary is correct, personally i dont rate your views and rants much at all as generally they have been shown to be way off the mark, but i do consider you are entitled to them.
Not sure why you keep mention8ng debenhams in isolation, id prefer to see the whole picture of the businesses, 13 brands now is it?, but happy for you to remain under the illusion that just debenhams seems to be performing, one of the component parts only. Although the BOO share price itself also seems to be unimpressed by that same argument, clinging well onto the low 30's still.
Welcome to your ownmopinion reardon, as indeed are all the posters you mention.
If you dont want to read a specific persons alternative view then the answer is in your own hands. filter them, saves you having to then. easy.
Spot on again
And the sp backs up everything you say
daytrade it's comical how you keep referring to me as some fantasy figure from your foetid imagination. why do it?
it's not me saying boo will return to profitability before 2026, its the analyst community. rather than posting long winded make believe on here why not actually do some real research. the rcf as it stands is the best part of £300m, no reduction takes place until mid 2025 as i understand it, so why lie about this? and why even post that a unit in leicester worth at best £2m is being sold because the funds are needed desperately. its complete rubbish isn't it?
as for director purchases, what impact have they had on the asos sp. its a pointless deflection, other than to show once again your complete lack of understanding of your supposed investment. simply go and look at the february rns and you will see all the non exec directors have a growing shareholding in the business. but that wouldn't fit with your agenda would it?
plt may be worthless now than boo paid for it, but thats what happens in markets. we can only look at deals in the context that they are done and i see you avoid admitting that the plt one was received favourably at the time. its hilarious that you completely ignore the debenhams deal. £55m for one of the best ever known brands in the uk and now apparently trading profitably.
still you keep ****ging off your own supposed investment, you obviously have nothing better to do with your life
Daytrade, spidey, Sam and Bon Scott you bring absolutely nothing to this board. Please leave (quietly)
Good post Bon,
fancy even him trying to make out it was a single one off trade, full of something
Oh tradey you do talk some carp, but a complete diehard does dig in in ggeneral when challenged so hardly surprising given your position here.
Rcf £300m is it? you topped it up or something?
last i read it was originally £325m, then a lender of £75m pulled out extending it because of their risk analysis. do try harder with the math.
as for "scheduled to return to profitability", supposedly, according to you "before mid 2026"
that is some pathetic baseless claim we've become used to seeing from you.
Neither I, the BOD, and especially not you have any concrete factual evidence of this at all - it is simply a guess and totally unproven, as well you and the rest of us know.
yes it waffles on about that in the company rns's but they are not a given are they - they are in essence a complete GUESS or PROJECTION or whatever else you and the BOD dress them up as.
Id suggest you view such guesses more cynically given the silent BOD's lack of interest and ability here. I mean, how many "growth" plans have they announced now, 2-4? ive lost count. Same as the continually reducing option prices.
How many shares has the BOD bought in at such rock bottom prices? thats right. None.
Thats a display of confidence for you, eh!
How much is that stake in Plt worth now? far far less than daddy paid his son et al for it (with shareholders monies). Bargain of the centuary for sure lol..
How is daddy spending his day? The answer is posting the odd photo on his yacht and an inspirational quote here and there. "everyday is a work day" he states.
Well maybe he should do what he says and do something to arrest the runaway decline thats been evident for several years now - with ZERO sign of any tangible recovery at all.
How low would this be if Big Mike didnt buy his 20%?.
Nobody else is buying this basket case, are they, and even big mike seems to have stopped now and not want anymore.
Look at the sp man.
The last few years here have been and continue to be a complete DISASTER, anybody with any sense can see it, alas you continue to do what a salesman does best, spin spin spin and attack anybody sensible enough to open their eyes and look objectively.
All done out of personal obsession and desparation having had money tied up in here and declining in value for yonks now.
Its great to see such a ramper on his own spike on here, too many get away with intentionaly misleading others.
You love this company so much, you are blinkered 101% towards it - your choice of course, but wont disclose your average, nor any buys, but its clear to everybody that your in deep, too deep and more and more desparate to close down the real story here.
I would feel sorry for you. . . .. . . but the way you behave prevents too many tears falling.
So, Coasty, you weren't pumping Superdry, you say? Merely a humble in-and-out share trade?
Seperate posts:
"Off to celebrate the meteoric superdry rise now😎"
"The rally over at superdry is exactly what will happen here at some point....."
"Feb 2nd: Superdry only had a 1. 5 percent short aswell.... Look at that rally...."
I sincerely hope that your heralded Superdry rally does NOT replicate itself at Boohoo. Conman.
No numbers since 3rd October 2023….Not one update all month.
This is very poor, no wonder the share price is going nowhere and near record lows.
Wake up BOO BOD!
Spot on tradey
You can understand why the directors are falling over themselves to buy shares in here recently.
Surely they are singing from the same hymn sheet as Stuart Little??
..... And not buying
only, as we have already established, southcoast said nothing of the sort did he daytrade. he merely did a short term trade.
so why continue with the continual lies.
so boo positive operational cash flows now, has an rcf approaching £300m that goes through to mid 2026, is scheduled to return to profitability before then so is absolutely nothing like superdry is it daytrade?
the servicing costs for the debt are about £11m per year per the accounts, so rather than being kind you are being excessively stupid stating that they are a risk based on turnover in excess of £1.5bn.
lets compare the influencers using the boo brand compared to superdry should we daytrade? does that suggest a tarnished brand to you in consumers eyes. or lets compare boo website visits to asos. boo up 11% last month, compared to asos flat. i hope you have figured out what similarweb actually does now, although it was hilarious seeing you show your stupidity yesterday.
or maybe let's look at the profitable debenhams brand which is now apparently profitable, do you think that is tarnished daytrade, does superdry have an equivalent?
why do you continually refer back to plt with your libellous comments. didnt the boo sp rise after the purchase of plt, which would indicate the market at the time thought it was a good deal?
come on daytrade, with the amount of time you spend ****ging off your supposed investment here, you should be able to do far better.
Oooo i see those goalposts have been moved to the centre circle and the deflectometer is on maximum warp drive again, always the same with old tradey/new bfd, deflecting away from the answer already provided, as below.
"Because Coasty hailed it as a stellar recovery play, that's why. Take it up with him."
Anyways, we all know The BOO brand is tarnished - had nothing but a serious drubbing for the last few years, and i dont recall anybody investigating Sdry for any shortcomings? In fact id maybe go so far as to say, with its drubbing and absolutley p1s5 poor PR efforts the BOO brand is now an actual liability! Sure as eggs are eggs nobody is buying the company story anymore, are they?
Debts, well, they are running on credit it would appear at the moment, happily munching through others money using the now reduced RCF. Perhaps they have planted a magic money tree to replenish that at some point?, one previous lender refusing to extend a good portion of it, as clearly with the forecast declines in revenue those servicing costs are under pressure (im being kind there).
As for high street stores - well an online seller wouldnt have any of those would they! They have however tried a pop up shop (was that waste of time repeated aagain - nope) and they have, through further scandals being exposed (labeling) been forced to close their 'centre of excellence (cough) in very short order, possibly to pop some coppers back in the till.
So, why given all the scandals, poor PR, and desparate position the company is in, in a growing market as well, wouldnt the still totally silent BOD fancy taking this back into private ownership?
It would make sense, they have rinsed the shareholders once (more if considering the PLT overpay) and enriched themselves with multi coloured lambos etc etc, all paid for at the shareholder expense, why indeed not try it again?
I mean that bargain basement share price - all the way down from 432 to 34p - some 90% decline, has shown a stellar performance from the "growth" companies board. Most firms would have booted them out for being slack a long time ago.
But dont worry, its all great in the BOO world because some faceless mug on a website said so, lol lol, and has been doing so all the way down.
Boohoo brand is not tarnished
Post of the day that will be
southcoast, so once again the pointless trolls are just goading and lying because they have nothing better to do with their lives.
same **** different day
Same question to you daytrade. Superdry has massive debt, huge bricks and mortar costs and a liquidity crisis. Not to mention a tarnished brand
Boo has none of those things.
It also has enough Ii investment to stop anything untoward happening.
So how could the same thing happen here, pls do enlighten us all.
Sorry daytrade I won't make the same mistake again...
"Bf - I think they're referring to the trade I did on superdry..... Got in at about 16p and out at 52.5."
My compliments. You avoided the accidental slip-up of referring to him as Tradey. Must keep up appearances!"
"Bf - I think they're referring to the trade I did on superdry..... Got in at about 16p and out at 52.5."
My compliments. You avoided the accidental slip-up of referring to him as Tradey. Must keep up appearances!
When parents start shopping at the same store as their kids it's a slippery slope
Want happen with boohoo.
Who in their right mind out of their teens would buy these high quality ethically sourced garments
Bf - I think they're referring to the trade I did on superdry..... Got in at about 16p and out at 52.5.
Thats a big shame voltaire, we have one of their stores in my town. its never jammed full but never empty either to be fair, but that is one fall from grace when looking at the shareholder value.
Right to be concerned that the same could happen here, is certainly possible the founding fathers may fancy taking this back off market for a song, avoid public further scrutiny while they try to 'grow' it up again then resell, rinse repeat. Im sure big mike would do a deal to facilitate if he came out ahead monetarily.
The whole Sdry thing is a good lesson in that fickle fashion arrives fast, then disappears just as fast again, only fast fashion is even faster.
You are the one making stupid claims on here Bon Scott.
As per usual no back up to the fud rubbish