London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
More to come..we are examining specific exploration opportunity in another jurisdiction. Well under value brighter times ahead the world needs renewable metals and battery minerals for a cleaner future DYOR
I think there is more to come .as it says in the RNs we are examining additional opportunities in battery metals more news to come anytime.annual report to be out at soon
DVH can't disagree with any of that. Stonepark is clearly more pertinent at present than any of the Mine River or Inishowen stuff (however interesting - and late! - they may be).
Seeing the repeated Twitter posts (by whom I wonder - not Jim or Johnno surely?) just starts to make me nervous that they want the share price up to raise funds! (though I doubt that's the case unless for something specific eg Zimbabwe).
what is the point of tweeting about what great gold prospects the company has with Mine River & Inishowen (2 tweets in the past few days!) when we are just not making any progress on either? Inishowen was supposed to be commencing its next drilling campaign in the 'spring' and what are the next steps at Mine River? 4 emails sent to the company asking for an update, none answered. Says it all really! Fortunately it is Group 11 overseeing the development of Stonepark....
Mcap £2.5m or so, very little free float as so much stock in 162 Group and ‘friendly LTH’ hands. Under the radar right now.
I am hoping this share will go up faster than Mo can flash fry a buffalo for Homer Simpson in 40 seconds. But I want it now Homer said.
I think there could be more to come in this news could be JV ?an old mine old data John teeling said in the pasted best place find a mine is beside a mine renewables minerals are needed now looking forward to the next news . annual report
Due out anytime
My property is on a acre of land so to multiply that by 403 acres makes it pretty big in my book for a 'toe in the water'!
163 hectares = 1.63 km2 = 403 acres!
If Teeling is about to trouser a large amount for Stonepark it only makes sense to have something to spend it on!
GL.
Interesting to note the comment, 'We continue to examine additional opportunities in battery metals.' particularly in the context of a potential sale of our share of the Stonepark project. According to my calculations our (3) licences cover an area of 403 acres (or 1.6m2) which is a decent amount of land for 'a toe in the water exercise'...
I personally thing you are spot on there. It would be the obvious thing to do given his comments recently on this and the other 162 Group companies that their ambitions are mainly as explorers not developers.
0.7840p to buy and 0.7550p to sell 1.2M pre NT. MMs clearly want our shares...
Telling from Teeling?
Is he planning for life after selling our 23.44% of Zinc at Stonepark?
It fits.
At the moment, it's a no buy. It has to go up 20% before b/e!!!
The very mention of Lithium gets the pulse racing.
Nice and interesting development.
Highlights just how low the mcap is!
GL.
DVH yes, a leftfield surprise! Zimbabwe is one of Teeling's old stomping grounds, he knows the place very well.
This could be very interesting indeed.
Well, that was unexpected (and interesting!)...
Yep, Mr. T made it clear to me in email that ARK are not there to see the Zinc into production. Or the gold for that matter.
As Mr. T put it : We are an exploration company.
Absolutely right Auc, we know we have a high grade zinc/lead resource at Stonepark, the question now is how much more are we likely to find. 10m tonnes and it becomes a worthwhile asset to get into production. Teeling will have sold our (minority) share of the project well before this reaches production! Current mcap £2.6M!
They actually ALREADY have 5.1m mt of high grade shallow depth pay dirt.
G11 say with the potential for another 50 to 100m mt which would eclipse or double Pallas Green at 45m mt
Its been potential multi bagger for a while - but the last RNS told us they actually have something valuable in the ground. And Michael Gentile in the picture - he has a great track record in picking miners....very pleased to buy some more today.
Now sit back and wait.
Downside risk here atm (mcap £2.8M) is minimal imo. Upside, potential multibagger!
It's coming!
GL.