We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Hi rxdav... I bought 30,000 BT many years ago at 81p sold at £4.85 Thought it time to buy back a few nothing to lose, so did
7,000 at £2.02 Sold 2,000 at £1.92. so slight loss. really bought for long term, I mean until I die. LOL for the Divi, while it lasts. Was only pulling your leg that I sold because you bought.
Morning BUTD - you've been very quiet over the weekend - any reason !?!?
IMO
rxdav is hardly the worst on here. actually liked his banter until he sold. doesn't deserve a ban if he had one.
Morning scally - if you were holding BT at low 190's then clearly you bought them higher - was that smart (won't be discussing other shares on here again though - but they are a long term hold - unlike many here)?
IMO
rxdav. When you bought your BT.A I knew then to sell some.
In for a load @ limit 1.40p......gl
Seems a far more restrained 'pump' this morning than has been seen of late - is the steam running out of the pump and dump crews (because that's all that has been supporting the SP these past couple of weeks)? Is Lucan going to buy as some have suggested (would be pretty much a last gasp attempt at BoD support (certainly with no serious news due for the foreseeable future)) - or is he saving his funds for the forthcoming litigation?
IMO
Well the ones they tell us they have.lol
I don’t think it will make much difference with the few drums of oil that they have.
Agreed.
One thing I assume we can both agree on is this:
"Reputations are hard won - but easily lost!"
To each his/her own interpretation, YL.
Some of the posters on this board always seem to choose the negative interpretation, others seem to choose the positive one.
That's what makes a market, I guess!
Ocelot: "you suggested the investigation was ongoing and PI's had not had an update, I pointed you in the direction of the 06/03 RNS in which the BoD concluded its investigation."
Sadly, just because our Bod don't see fit to fully disclose JTP's dodgy dealings.... IF, as they claim: "the investigation has confirmed that the Company's share dealing code was not complied with", then IMHO it is NOT CASE CLOSED.... more likely: case swept under the carpet for convenience!
The problem is:
this kind of sloppy leadership really does not wash with "serious" investors in 2019.
If ANGS want to genuinely engage with the market, they need to wash the nasty stink from their old clothes... because if they don't... it will just follow them around to their detriment (like JTP) for as long as they last!
Real Analyst, you say the company has £5m, more if Brockham sold. For simplicity’s sake let’s say that is valued at £3m. Market cap currently £8m share price @1.6p. So £8m split over the existing shares is 1.6p per share. Doesn’t help anyone who bought at 6/8/10 or 15p.
RA - What sort of time frame are we talking about here.
2 years or 3 years, what ever monies £2.5m or £5m will be long time spent and gone.
What happens if Balcombe delivers and Saltfleetby delivers, and perhaps add in some Brockham and Lidsey production?
Remember even in your own words its 2020, the Court Case could be 2021 or 2022 or longer!
Share price could easily be 20p+ by then, are you still going to proceed with the CC then?
And what if you lose the case and ANGUS want compensation???
All I see is a very bitter ex shareholder, nothing more. You need to move on. Or buy some at this low price and make your money back.
RealAnalyst,
I was asking for the evidence, not for an assertion by yourself.
Is there any evidence, please?
Captain Stanley
Very funny I'm sure.My view that the company was undervalued before were based on the statements which I believed to be true that the oil levels at Brockham were richer and the oil equally as mature as at HH.This was repeatedly stated.So if you want to criticise anyone''s analysis, criticise the BOD''s analysis!
Say what you want about me because I couldn't give a rats arsee, but if you think I am going to accept this then YOU are delusional.I will accept this over my dead body.
There have been successful AIM claims before such as Quindell,and this WILL be another one I can assure you.We wouldn't have top counsel willing to work on it if it was a no-hoper.
Investors deserve and WILL get recompense for the losses caused to them by the negligence,false and misleading statements, and downright lies told to them.
Ffs man....he did it last summer....what more evidence do you need?-and we certainly infer from the data that was insider trading.
Charlie London
I think- from the advice given by both a specialist financial cOundle and partner in a firm of city solicitors-it will be easier this time.
For a start,certain personage's with an infamous family history won't want everything dredging through an open court and therefore splashed over the front pages of the tabloids-and likely some of the broadsheets too.The sheer volume of evidence we have,which will be augmented at the Derby AIM oil investor conference of August 4th,means it's virtually inevitable they will seek an out of court settlement.
The third party funding covers costs,whether victorious or not.
Others may be prepares to sit by indifferently as their money is stolen through what is basically a confidence trick,bit we aren't!
Don't listen to the naysayers-they haven't lost anything and just want to trade to make a quick buck.
If you've lost £20 or 30 or 50,000 or even £100,000-or any amount-please join us.
Ignore the trolls on here.They don't know better than an experienced barrister who is an expert on the financial services industry.
Get in touch and I will put you in touch with him.
keither197@gmail.com
PS: for the moment, nobody's suggested any evidence to support the allegation of shorting by JTP.
YL,
I didn't quote it because it wasn't relevant to the point I was making:
you suggested the investigation was ongoing and PIs had not had an update, I pointed you in the direction of the 06/03 RNS in which the BoD concluded its investigation.
Ocelot....
I'm sure you didn't miss the last paragraph out intentionally?
(as I said... no line drawn underneath this... just a wrap on the knuckles)
last paragraph from the BOD Included here for sake of transparency:
"...Whilst the Board expresses sympathy for Mr. Tidswell-Pretorius' legal position, the investigation has confirmed that the Company's share dealing code was not complied with and accordingly for clarification Mr. Tidswell-Pretorius will not be reinstated to the Board but remains the Group's non-board director of operations."
(In other words: Tut tut tut JTP... but what the Hell, let's move you sideways and in a few months time all those LTH's with short term memory loss will have forgotten and our new investors won't have a clue!?!)
AS IF!
and - as I recall - "that investigation" is still on-going?!?! Only - as usual - PI's haven't had an update, so no line to draw under this as yet!
-----------------------------------------------------
Refer you to the RNS of 06/03, YL:
The Company has concluded its investigation into the dealings in 39,000,000 shares belonging to its former Executive Chairman, Mr. Jonathan Tidswell-Pretorius ("JT"). These dealings arose as a consequence of a Loan Agreement with a third-party equity linked lender (the "Lender") and the resulting transfers of shares to its stockbroker (the "Lender's Broker") as announced in multiple RNS releases last year. For completeness sake we set out in Appendix One below the timeline of all of the material transactions and steps involved. It should be noted at the outset that no funds were ever advanced under the Loan Agreement...
YL,
Nothing to do with "fake surprise".
I am aware of shenanigans last year, but did not follow it closely at the time, having no stake in Angs until more recently (recently enough to get caught out by Brockham, mind you!).
But the shenanigans, as far as I am aware, involved the sale of stock, not its shorting.
So what evidence is there to support the allegation of shorting?