Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Parm u shouldn't be investing if u thought I made 209%...bought in at 0.16 and the sp went to 0.80 plus.... I didn't top slice at the top but maths not your strong point.
Still waiting what facts or material news you have read on the last 2 weeks rns? Or are you a blind ramper hoping for the best.
Kn0bhead
Duffer.. LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL I think one of you lot referred to AZ as a snake oil salesman. Try this phrase... POT KETTLE ;)
I am not selling up because I want to see where this goes. It could be big as the model is scalable but over the last 2 weeks I am starting to lose faith, as so many rns have been released without any real substance or facts.
If you have read proper facts or seen anything signed with names please let me know
Dufry, you say your invested.
According to you, you have made a 200% gain, so why not just sell up?
Why would you slate a company that has just made you money? Take your gains and invest (LOL) somewhere else?
Would save you loads of stress and time ..bashing a share you have no stake in...err I mean no belief in ;)
Knowles man, he's no intention of investing.
He doesn't know his arse from his elbow and gets paid chip money to deramp this share. That's all. That's it. Please don't believe these trolls when they say they are invested. They are not, and will not.
Bobak I agree with you. Bought in at 0.16 and am on a free. Have written this off now and don't care. From day dot I said this was a punt. But now over the last 2 weeks I don't trust this chap AZ.
Yes the business model sounds great and it's not a scam. But he is selling this as a ferrari when so far reality looks like its a fiat.
The twitter response below says it all.
Feel free to filter me, don't give a flying f.... But something not right here.
Still don't understand your point Badok, why such negativity with SYME if you still intend to invest, do you think your pointless comments will influence the share price so you can get a cheaper entry point, I'm sure you view point will change instantly the moment you reinvest so why bother, sit on the sidelines, wait for your entry point then jump in and join the enjoy ride.
Extrader i would never have touched Russian bonds. Russia as you know is very corrupt. Yet you are here not invested but questioning everything. We will have the bank name shortly once the buy has been approved by the regulators and storm harbour. We will also have updates on the pilots. Im sure this will add to your tease. I suggest you put money where your mouth is and invest. Its less risky than those dodgy bonds you were in.
Dont know why you bothered i filtered him ages ago
Bobak, its clear to me and anybody looking at your post history that you invested your stake at the peak of the initial rise and sold at a loss, I hate to break this to you but that is share dealing for you, 99 time out of 100 you will find you yourself at a loss at the start of your investment as it is almost impossible to catch the bottom of any share. The key to investing is research and patience. One of mt oldest investment is now 15 years old and its been largely unaffected by COVID and still paying a dividend, so the key to investing is patience and regular research, if you can do neither then I suggest that investing is not for you.
Time will tell whether or not they want to give support .
Hi extrader,
I wonder if he would have answered that he is in the process of banking it as we all sit around debating whether his company is legit or not, and that he'll be long gone when Brexit kicks in putting it into his fellow grand deceiver's real estate companies!
That's one of my nightmare's anyway.
I recall reading in the RNS that they only help companies with good credit records and don't take on stock that can't sell.
But they want to help a company selling airline engines, whose credit rating was reduced to Junk by Moody's..
Doesn't this break all their underwriting promises?
Hi justthefactsmam,
I think it was cattle, hence AZ's wordplay about 'stock control'.
This would have backfired badly had anyone thought to ask him : 'Where's the beef ?'
;->
ATB
That AZ Tweet regarding Carrefour seems a very plausible scenario to me
'Dear Tim, these kind of players could support their suppliers using the inventory monetisation service across the end to end supply chain'
I don't really think it makes a lot of difference if the client isn't Carrefour. Whether it be Carrefour or not, the payment is the same & guaranteed for three years & it is on stock that is being sold.
AZ Tweeted this earlier 'Dear Tim, these kind of players could support their suppliers using the inventory monetisation service across the end to end supply chain'
Hi extrader. I agree. Without evidence, I actually have been considering this was a trial test company that may have just allowed its inventory to be test run in pilot software. If it was a success, would this company be a continuing client. Its different when you get something for free and then when you have to start paying for it. How do we know one of the italians isnt friendly with the company, for example, and they just allowed SYME to test its platform with a simulation.
I hope when he tested the platform with sheep i seem to recall, it wasnt some kind of inside joke, with us being the sheep!
Perhaps to demonstrate that those utilising SYME have huge clients so there is a lower risk of the stock not being sold. Just a thought.
Spaghetti - just need to look at the number of "followers" he has and the number of likes/retweets he gets, usually no more than 1 or 2. All the replies are just abuse which should give you what the general consensus of this individual opinions are.
I think a wholehearted yes seadoc. I also imagine it would include the pest control company who fumigates twice a year in one Milan branch of Carreour (if there is one). I cant imagine why they would use such wording in the RNS when everyone important in the company of importance and their lawyers will have been pondering every word. It doesnt help anyone and makes me think its a big con again. Why else would they do it? I just cant comprehend why they would use the names of companies they are not trading with, when many of us, myself included, read it as trading with those companies. Its shocking and AZ will i am sure have to get another RNS out explaining himself...and i would urge the twitterarty to ask him directly what he is playing out. This needs clarification or the share price is going to tank!
Hi seadoc,
(1) Anecdotal university Finals, Philosophy question : 'Is this a fair question ?'
Student hesitates for a moment, scribbles a few words, then gets up and walks out.
His answer : " I suppose so, if this is a fair answer". He - again anecdotally - went on to a First.
(2) To address, not necessarily answer your Q, if you accept the concept of '6 degrees of separation', then surely this is OK ?
;->
ATB
Whoops a hound not a bound .... there cannot be a no reason for this ..... to be allowed without SOME merit surely
TW Not holy happy yet again.... has this legs or is it only him ... I really don't know why a bound chases bone so hard
Hi justthefactsmam,
The 'sleight of hand' - if that is what it is - is all the more surprising when SYME appears to have done a financing for these people
https://www.tascadalmerita.it/en/,
who seem pretty 'high end'.
I can't find a link to the SYME-specific article, which was on a wine-club website, but did find this more generic reference :
https://www.finextra.com/blogposting/15016/blockchain-in-the-supply-chain-use-cases-inventory-finance
Camerinelli is a SYME NED.
ATB
This looks to be a pretty high end operation
Very interesting and well observed extrader. Especially point 3, which caught my eye.
You are clearly correct that they have named companies that they are not trading with, which is at best deceitful considering it is the names of the actual companies we want, and at worst, well, event the most ardent supporter cant argue with this: "This portfolio comprises corporates of various sizes which form part of supply chains led by the following companies..."
I had been feeling rather relaxed about this whole thing today, and I am sure your other points are equally as astute to someone who understands such technical aspects. But naming rather large companies and not actually naming 'THE' companies should be an insult to everyone here, regardless of what investment we are protecting.
I dont know what to make of it actually but the reality is the reality, and AZ has just again pulled a slight over most of our eyes. I wonder how Carrefour and the other companies feel about being named in this RNS when they are not directly dealing with them. One can only continue to ask who the companies are SYME is dealing with and why SYME are continuing to hide behind some rather excellently written legaleze that suggests one thing but says absolutely nothing. And not for the first time either.
And if there is this much deceit behind naming names, what do you think it says about the projections and numbers. And one further reach, what do you think it says about AZ? I feel rather shafted and deflated once again!